2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Supporting Shared Decision-making About Surveillance After Breast Cancer With Personalized Recurrence Risk Calculations: Development of a Patient Decision Aid Using the International Patient Decision AIDS Standards Development Process in Combination With a Mixed Methods Design

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although the treatment for breast cancer is highly personalized, posttreatment surveillance remains one-size-fits-all: annual imaging and physical examination for at least five years after treatment. The INFLUENCE nomogram is a prognostic model for estimating the 5-year risk for locoregional recurrences and second primary tumors after breast cancer. The use of personalized outcome data (such as risks for recurrences) can enrich the process of shared decision-making (SDM) for personalized surveillance after breast cancer.

          Objective

          This study aimed to develop a patient decision aid (PtDA), integrating personalized risk calculations on risks for recurrences, to support SDM for personalized surveillance after curative treatment for invasive breast cancer.

          Methods

          For the development of the PtDA, the International Patient Decision Aids Standards development process was combined with a mixed methods design inspired by the development process of previously developed PtDAs. In the development, 8 steps were distinguished: establishing a multidisciplinary steering group; definition of the end users, scope, and purpose of the PtDA; assessment of the decisional needs of end users; defining requirements for the PtDA; determining the format and implementation strategy for the PtDA; prototyping; alpha testing; and beta testing. The composed steering group convened during regular working-group sessions throughout the development process.

          Results

          The “Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid” consists of 3 components that support the SDM process: a handout sheet on which personalized risks for recurrences, calculated using the INFLUENCE-nomogram, can be visualized and which contains an explanation about the decision for surveillance and a login code for a web-based deliberation tool; a web-based deliberation tool, including a patient-reported outcome measure on fear of cancer recurrence; and a summary sheet summarizing patient preferences and considerations. The PtDA was assessed as usable and acceptable during alpha testing. Beta testing is currently ongoing.

          Conclusions

          We developed an acceptable and usable PtDA that integrates personalized risk calculations for the risk for recurrences to support SDM for surveillance after breast cancer. The implementation and effects of the use of the “Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid” are being investigated in a clinical trial.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

          Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

            Decision aids are interventions that support patients by making their decisions explicit, providing information about options and associated benefits/harms, and helping clarify congruence between decisions and personal values.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice

              The principles of shared decision making are well documented but there is a lack of guidance about how to accomplish the approach in routine clinical practice. Our aim here is to translate existing conceptual descriptions into a three-step model that is practical, easy to remember, and can act as a guide to skill development. Achieving shared decision making depends on building a good relationship in the clinical encounter so that information is shared and patients are supported to deliberate and express their preferences and views during the decision making process. To accomplish these tasks, we propose a model of how to do shared decision making that is based on choice, option and decision talk. The model has three steps: a) introducing choice, b) describing options, often by integrating the use of patient decision support, and c) helping patients explore preferences and make decisions. This model rests on supporting a process of deliberation, and on understanding that decisions should be influenced by exploring and respecting “what matters most” to patients as individuals, and that this exploration in turn depends on them developing informed preferences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Cancer
                JMIR Cancer
                JC
                JMIR Cancer
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2369-1999
                Oct-Dec 2022
                14 November 2022
                : 8
                : 4
                : e38088
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Technology and Services Research University of Twente Enschede Netherlands
                [2 ] Santeon Utrecht Netherlands
                [3 ] Department of Research and Development Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation Utrecht Netherlands
                [4 ] Department of Surgery Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen Netherlands
                [5 ] Department of Quality and Safety Catharina Hospital Eindhoven Netherlands
                [6 ] Department of Surgery Catharina Hospital Eindhoven Netherlands
                [7 ] Department of Internal Medicine Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam Netherlands
                [8 ] Department of Internal Medicine Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden Netherlands
                [9 ] Department of Neurology OLVG Amsterdam Netherlands
                [10 ] ZorgKeuzeLab Delft Netherlands
                [11 ] Dutch Breast Cancer Society Utrecht Netherlands
                [12 ] Department of Psychology, Health & Technology University of Twente Enschede Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Jet Wies Ankersmid j.w.ankersmid@ 123456utwente.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-8147
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-824X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-3003
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2165-6039
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4465-5768
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-554X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-4793
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4258-3983
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1655-6850
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9134-7004
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-416X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7083-3169
                Article
                v8i4e38088
                10.2196/38088
                9706380
                36374536
                e6b2650b-a4a7-4036-ab99-32afcfc33510
                ©Jet Wies Ankersmid, Sabine Siesling, Luc J A Strobbe, Johanna M Meulepas, Yvonne E A van Riet, Noel Engels, Janine C M Prick, Regina The, Asako Takahashi, Mirjam Velting, Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan, Constance H C Drossaert. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 14.11.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cancer, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://cancer.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 27 March 2022
                : 29 May 2022
                : 14 September 2022
                : 16 September 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                patient decision aid,ptda,breast cancer,surveillance,risk information,shared decision-making,sdm

                Comments

                Comment on this article