Reply to the Editor:
Dr Kaneko reported consultant/speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott
Structural Heart, Baylis Medical, and 4C Medical. Dr Moon reported consultant/advisor
board for Medtronic. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest.
The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest
and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict
of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
We thank the authors for their interest in our article, which highlights the contemporary
challenges and opportunities for mentorship in the context of the coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for thoracic surgery (TS) trainees.
1
Do-Nguyen and colleagues
2
further add to this discussion and raise important concerns regarding the importance
of mentorship and sponsorship for prospective TS residency applicants in the current
application cycle. The diminished opportunities for mentorship and external rotations
have substantially limited applicant exposure to programs and have also hindered a
holistic assessment of potential applicants in terms of skill sets, decision-making,
emotional intelligence, and work ethics. Thus, we agree with the authors' sentiments
that in these challenging times, we must develop creative ways to support the upcoming
applicants.
Undoubtedly, the very essential tenets of our cardiothoracic field—patient care, scholarship,
and mentorship—have been upended, thus forcing us on an individual and organizational
level to find innovative ways to achieve these goals. Thus, while we agree that it
is paramount that both TS faculty and trainees should individually actively seek to
develop creative ways to engage medical students, we feel that this will be best accomplished
at the “Cardiothoracic Surgical (CTS) Community” level that impacts all applicants
in this cycle (Figure 1
).
Figure 1
Conceptual framework for “Cardiothoracic Surgical Community” engagement in the COVID-19
era. COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019; AATS, American Association for Thoracic Surgery;
STS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons; TSDA, Thoracic Surgery Directors Association; CT,
cardiothoracic.
The “CTS Community” approach is critical for 2 reasons: first, to level the playing
field in the context of the existing differential ongoing/downstream COVID-19 impact
on individual hospitals (eg, lower caseloads, limited resources, funding cuts, etc).
For instance, some hard-hit hospitals may ban medical students from the rotation,
whereas other hospitals may continue to have rotations, due to a lower COVID-19 incidence
in their area. The inequality of clinical opportunity will substantially impact applicant
assessment, and the infrastructure to level the grounds for the differences can only
be achieved through widespread “CTS Community” efforts. Second, the approach is critical
to provide all applicants with equitable opportunity to interact with prospective
programs through activities such as virtual “Meet and Greet” and campus tours (either
live or taped), journal-club style debates, and virtual sub-internships.
Currently, there are several ongoing efforts at the organization level that are noteworthy—the
American Association for Thoracic Surgery “Member for a Day” program, the Society
of Thoracic Surgeons “Looking to the Future” program, and the American College of
Surgeons/Society of Thoracic Surgeons “Cardiothoracic Surgery in Your Future.” The
Thoracic Surgery Directors Association has also remained instrumental in these efforts,
and recently set forth recommendations for programs to perform only virtual interviews
and cancel elective, away rotations, based on best practices set forth by organizations
in other surgical specialties.
3
,
4
We applaud all these existing efforts and hope that the entire cardiothoracic surgical
community (including all faculty and trainees) will continue to embrace the changing
culture of the upcoming application cycle and take a keen interest in mentorship the
next generation of TS trainees.