29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Challenges in Internet Addiction Disorder: Is a Diagnosis Feasible or Not?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An important international discussion began because of some pioneer studies carried out by Young (a) on the internet addiction disorder (IAD). In the fifth and most recent version of the Diagnostic, and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) there is no mention of this disorder and among researchers there are basically two opposite positions. Those who are in favor of a specific diagnosis and those who are claiming the importance of specific criteria characterizing this behavior and the precise role it has in the patient’s life. The aim of the present paper is to answer the question whether it is possible or not to formulate diagnoses of internet-related disorders. We revised literature on the history of diagnostic criteria, on neurocognitive evidence, on the topic debate and on IAD instrumental measures. We found that the disorder was not univocally defined and that the construct was somehow too broad and generic to be explicative for a diagnosis. Indeed, the models are borrowed from other addiction pathologies and they are often formulated before the development of internet as intended in current society. In conclusion, we think we need a more innovative, integrated and comprehensive model for an IAD diagnosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use

          R.A. Davis (2001)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach.

            For the first time, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-5) introduces non-substance addictions as psychiatric diagnoses. The aims of this paper are to (i) present the main controversies surrounding the decision to include internet gaming disorder, but not internet addiction more globally, as a non-substance addiction in the research appendix of the DSM-5, and (ii) discuss the meaning behind the DSM-5 criteria for internet gaming disorder. The paper also proposes a common method for assessing internet gaming disorder. Although the need for common diagnostic criteria is not debated, the existence of multiple instruments reflect the divergence of opinions in the field regarding how best to diagnose this condition. We convened international experts from European, North and South American, Asian and Australasian countries to discuss and achieve consensus about assessing internet gaming disorder as defined within DSM-5. We describe the intended meaning behind each of the nine DSM-5 criteria for internet gaming disorder and present a single item that best reflects each criterion, translated into the 10 main languages of countries in which research on this condition has been conducted. Using results from this cross-cultural collaboration, we outline important research directions for understanding and assessing internet gaming disorder. As this field moves forward, it is critical that researchers and clinicians around the world begin to apply a common methodology; this report is the first to achieve an international consensus related to the assessment of internet gaming disorder. © 2014 Society for the Study of Addiction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                06 June 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 842
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Literature, Arts, History and Society, University of Parma Parma, Italy
                [2] 2Psychology Research Laboratory, Ospedale San Giuseppe, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Verbania, Italy
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan Milan, Italy
                [4] 4Private Practice Cremona, Italy
                [5] 5Argo Clinical Center Milan, Italy
                [6] 6Department of Psychology, University of Bergamo Bergamo, Italy
                [7] 7Private Practice Parma, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Edward Callus, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy

                Reviewed by: Stefano Manzo, Anima Research Institute, Italy; David F. Carreno, University of Almeria, Spain

                *Correspondence: Alessandro Musetti, alessandro.musetti@ 123456unipr.it

                This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00842
                4894006
                27375523
                e7ebc658-618b-401a-9d62-ecd4dfc95b6d
                Copyright © 2016 Musetti, Cattivelli, Giacobbi, Zuglian, Ceccarini, Capelli, Pietrabissa and Castelnuovo.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 November 2015
                : 20 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 108, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                internet addiction disorder,addiction,internet-related psychopathology,diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article