7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bullous Pemphigoid Associated With COVID-19 Vaccines: An Italian Multicentre Study

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune bullous disease caused by circulating autoantibodies toward the hemidesmosomal antigens BP180 and BP230. Cases of BP have been described following vaccinations against tetanus, poliomyelitis, diphtheria, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, hepatitis B and rabies. The putative mechanism by which COVID-19-vaccines may induce BP has not been clarified. An Italian multicentre study was conducted to collect clinical, histopathological and immunopathological data of patients with BP associated with COVID-19-vaccines. Twenty-one cases were collected, including 9 females and 12 males (M/F = 1.3) with a median age at diagnosis of 82 years. Seventeen patients received the COMIRNATY Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, two the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, one the ChAdOx1/nCoV-19-AstraZeneca/ Vaxzevria vaccine and one received the first dose with the ChAdOx1/nCoV-19-AstraZeneca/Vaxzevria vaccine and the second dose with the COMIRNATY Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Median latency time between the first dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and the onset of cutaneous manifestations was 27 days. Median BPDAI at onset was 42. Eleven out of seventeen patients (65%) had positive titres for anti-BP180 antibodies with a median value of 106.3 U/mL on ELISA; in contrast, only five out of seventeen (29%) were positive for anti-BP230 antibodies, with a median of 35.3 U/mL. In conclusion, in terms of mean age, disease severity at diagnosis and clinical phenotype vaccine-associated BP patients seem to be similar to idiopathic BP with an overall benign course with appropriate treatment. On the other hand, the slight male predominance and the reduced humoral response to BP230 represent peculiar features of this subset of patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cutaneous Reactions Reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccination: A Registry-Based Study of 414 Cases

          Background Cutaneous reactions after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines have been reported but are not well characterized. Objective To evaluate morphology and timing of cutaneous reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Methods A provider-facing registry-based study collected cases of cutaneous manifestations after COVID-19 vaccination. Results From December 2020-February 2021, we recorded 414 cutaneous reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna (83%) and Pfizer (17%). Delayed large local reactions were most common, followed by local injection site reactions, urticarial eruptions, and morbilliform eruptions. Forty-three percent of patients with first dose reactions experienced second dose recurrence. Limitations Registry analysis does not measure incidence. Morphologic misclassification is possible. Conclusion We report a spectrum of cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Most patients with first dose reactions did not develop a second dose reaction, and no patients in the registry developed serious adverse events after the first or second dose. These data provide reassurance to patients and providers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Reaction of Human Monoclonal Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Proteins With Tissue Antigens: Implications for Autoimmune Diseases

            We sought to determine whether immune reactivity occurs between anti-SARS-CoV-2 protein antibodies and human tissue antigens, and whether molecular mimicry between COVID-19 viral proteins and human tissues could be the cause. We applied both human monoclonal anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies (spike protein, nucleoprotein) and rabbit polyclonal anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies (envelope protein, membrane protein) to 55 different tissue antigens. We found that SARS-CoV-2 antibodies had reactions with 28 out of 55 tissue antigens, representing a diversity of tissue groups that included barrier proteins, gastrointestinal, thyroid and neural tissues, and more. We also did selective epitope mapping using BLAST and showed similarities and homology between spike, nucleoprotein, and many other SARS-CoV-2 proteins with the human tissue antigens mitochondria M2, F-actin and TPO. This extensive immune cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and different antigen groups may play a role in the multi-system disease process of COVID-19, influence the severity of the disease, precipitate the onset of autoimmunity in susceptible subgroups, and potentially exacerbate autoimmunity in subjects that have pre-existing autoimmune diseases. Very recently, human monoclonal antibodies were approved for use on patients with COVID-19. The human monoclonal antibodies used in this study are almost identical with these approved antibodies. Thus, our results can establish the potential risk for autoimmunity and multi-system disorders with COVID-19 that may come from cross-reactivity between our own human tissues and this dreaded virus, and thus ensure that the badly-needed vaccines and treatments being developed for it are truly safe to use against this disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Methotrexate hampers immunogenicity to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in immune-mediated inflammatory disease

              Objective To investigate the humoral and cellular immune response to messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on immunomodulatory treatment. Methods Established patients at New York University Langone Health with IMID (n=51) receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination were assessed at baseline and after second immunisation. Healthy subjects served as controls (n=26). IgG antibody responses to the spike protein were analysed for humoral response. Cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 was further analysed using high-parameter spectral flow cytometry. A second independent, validation cohort of controls (n=182) and patients with IMID (n=31) from Erlangen, Germany, were also analysed for humoral immune response. Results Although healthy subjects (n=208) and patients with IMID on biologic treatments (mostly on tumour necrosis factor blockers, n=37) demonstrate robust antibody responses (over 90%), those patients with IMID on background methotrexate (n=45) achieve an adequate response in only 62.2% of cases. Similarly, patients with IMID on methotrexate do not demonstrate an increase in CD8+ T-cell activation after vaccination. Conclusions In two independent cohorts of patients with IMID, methotrexate, a widely used immunomodulator for the treatment of several IMIDs, adversely affected humoral and cellular immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Although precise cut-offs for immunogenicity that correlate with vaccine efficacy are yet to be established, our findings suggest that different strategies may need to be explored in patients with IMID taking methotrexate to increase the chances of immunisation efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 as has been demonstrated for augmenting immunogenicity to other viral vaccines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front. Med.
                Frontiers in Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-858X
                28 February 2022
                2022
                28 February 2022
                : 9
                : 841506
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [3] 3Rare Diseases Unit, Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, Unità Sanitaria Locale Toscana Centro, European Reference Network-Skin Member, University of Florence , Florence, Italy
                [4] 4Department of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste , Trieste, Italy
                [5] 5Dermatology Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital , Bergamo, Italy
                [6] 6Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital , Bergamo, Italy
                [7] 7DiSSal, Dermatology Clinic, University of Genoa, San Martino Policlinic Hospital- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico , Genoa, Italy
                [8] 8Dermatology Clinic, Department Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari , Cagliari, Italy
                [9] 9Department of Health Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Florence , Florence, Italy
                [10] 10Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico , Rome, Italy
                [11] 11Dermatology Clinic, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico , Rome, Italy
                [12] 12Rare Disease Unit, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico , Rome, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Aikaterini Patsatsi, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

                Reviewed by: Ömer Kutlu, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Turkey; Manuel Valdebran Canales, Medical University of South Carolina, United States

                *Correspondence: Giovanni Di Zenzo g.dizenzo@ 123456idi.it

                This article was submitted to Dermatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine

                †These authors share first authorship

                ‡These authors share last authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fmed.2022.841506
                8918943
                35295599
                e7fd195e-796b-4f43-bb6c-8a1c5189facd
                Copyright © 2022 Maronese, Caproni, Moltrasio, Genovese, Vezzoli, Sena, Previtali, Cozzani, Gasparini, Parodi, Atzori, Antiga, Maglie, Moro, Mariotti, Corrà, Pallotta, Didona, Marzano and Di Zenzo.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 December 2021
                : 03 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 8, Words: 5555
                Categories
                Medicine
                Brief Research Report

                bullous pemphigoid,vaccine,covid-19,autoantibodies,sars-cov-2,triggering factors,bp180,bp230

                Comments

                Comment on this article