6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Magnitude of Satisfaction and Associated Factors Among Household Heads Who Visited Health Facilities with Community-Based Health Insurance Scheme in Anilemo District, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Community-based health insurance (CBHI) schemes are an emerging strategy for providing financial protection against healthcare-related poverty. In Ethiopia, CBHI is being piloted in 13 districts, but community experience and satisfaction with the scheme have yet to be studied.

          Objective

          To assess the magnitude of satisfaction and associated factors among household heads who visited health facilities with community-based health insurance schemes in the Anilemo district Hadiya Zone Southern Ethiopia.

          Methods

          A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted for 627 household heads in the Anilemo district, from March 1–30, 2020. Study participants were selected using stratified random sampling for kebeles and systematic sampling for study households. Data were collected by trained data collectors using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. P values less than 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals were used to determine associations between independent and dependent variables.

          Results

          The magnitude of household heads’ satisfaction was 54.1%. Household heads age [AOR=1.70;95% CI 1.09–2.67], households income [AOR=0.19; 95% CI 0.11–0.35], knowledge of CBHI benefit packages [AOR=3.15; 95% CI 1.97–5.03], agreement with laboratory services [AOR=2.25; 95% CI 1.40–3.62], and got and agreed with prescribed drugs [AOR=2.69; 95% CI 1.66–4.37] were significantly associated with the magnitude of household heads satisfaction with community-based health insurance.

          Conclusion

          About half of the household heads who visited health facilities with CBHIS were satisfied. Age, household’s income, knowledge of CBHI benefit packages, agreement with laboratory service provision, availability and agreement with prescribed drugs were significant predictors of satisfaction with CBHI. Therefore, much effort could be required to increase the magnitude of the household head’s satisfaction with the scheme.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Health financing for universal coverage and health system performance: concepts and implications for policy.

          Unless the concept is clearly understood, "universal coverage" (or universal health coverage, UHC) can be used to justify practically any health financing reform or scheme. This paper unpacks the definition of health financing for universal coverage as used in the World Health Organization's World health report 2010 to show how UHC embodies specific health system goals and intermediate objectives and, broadly, how health financing reforms can influence these. All countries seek to improve equity in the use of health services, service quality and financial protection for their populations. Hence, the pursuit of UHC is relevant to every country. Health financing policy is an integral part of efforts to move towards UHC, but for health financing policy to be aligned with the pursuit of UHC, health system reforms need to be aimed explicitly at improving coverage and the intermediate objectives linked to it, namely, efficiency, equity in health resource distribution and transparency and accountability. The unit of analysis for goals and objectives must be the population and health system as a whole. What matters is not how a particular financing scheme affects its individual members, but rather, how it influences progress towards UHC at the population level. Concern only with specific schemes is incompatible with a universal coverage approach and may even undermine UHC, particularly in terms of equity. Conversely, if a scheme is fully oriented towards system-level goals and objectives, it can further progress towards UHC. Policy and policy analysis need to shift from the scheme to the system level.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Equity in Health Care Financing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Studies Using Benefit and Financing Incidence Analyses

            Introduction Health financing reforms in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) over the past decades have focused on achieving equity in financing of health care delivery through universal health coverage. Benefit and financing incidence analyses are two analytical methods for comprehensively evaluating how well health systems perform on these objectives. This systematic review assesses progress towards equity in health care financing in LMICs through the use of BIA and FIA. Methods and Findings Key electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Scopus, Global Health, CinAHL, EconLit and Business Source Premier were searched. We also searched the grey literature, specifically websites of leading organizations supporting health care in LMICs. Only studies using benefit incidence analysis (BIA) and/or financing incidence analysis (FIA) as explicit methodology were included. A total of 512 records were obtained from the various sources. The full texts of 87 references were assessed against the selection criteria and 24 were judged appropriate for inclusion. Twelve of the 24 studies originated from sub-Saharan Africa, nine from the Asia-Pacific region, two from Latin America and one from the Middle East. The evidence points to a pro-rich distribution of total health care benefits and progressive financing in both sub-Saharan Africa and Asia-Pacific. In the majority of cases, the distribution of benefits at the primary health care level favoured the poor while hospital level services benefit the better-off. A few Asian countries, namely Thailand, Malaysia and Sri Lanka, maintained a pro-poor distribution of health care benefits and progressive financing. Conclusion Studies evaluated in this systematic review indicate that health care financing in LMICs benefits the rich more than the poor but the burden of financing also falls more on the rich. There is some evidence that primary health care is pro-poor suggesting a greater investment in such services and removal of barriers to care can enhance equity. The results overall suggest that there are impediments to making health care more accessible to the poor and this must be addressed if universal health coverage is to be a reality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Trends in future health financing and coverage: future health spending and universal health coverage in 188 countries, 2016–40

              Summary Background Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) requires health financing systems that provide prepaid pooled resources for key health services without placing undue financial stress on households. Understanding current and future trajectories of health financing is vital for progress towards UHC. We used historical health financing data for 188 countries from 1995 to 2015 to estimate future scenarios of health spending and pooled health spending through to 2040. Methods We extracted historical data on gross domestic product (GDP) and health spending for 188 countries from 1995 to 2015, and projected annual GDP, development assistance for health, and government, out-of-pocket, and prepaid private health spending from 2015 through to 2040 as a reference scenario. These estimates were generated using an ensemble of models that varied key demographic and socioeconomic determinants. We generated better and worse alternative future scenarios based on the global distribution of historic health spending growth rates. Last, we used stochastic frontier analysis to investigate the association between pooled health resources and UHC index, a measure of a country's UHC service coverage. Finally, we estimated future UHC performance and the number of people covered under the three future scenarios. Findings In the reference scenario, global health spending was projected to increase from US$10 trillion (95% uncertainty interval 10 trillion to 10 trillion) in 2015 to $20 trillion (18 trillion to 22 trillion) in 2040. Per capita health spending was projected to increase fastest in upper-middle-income countries, at 4·2% (3·4–5·1) per year, followed by lower-middle-income countries (4·0%, 3·6–4·5) and low-income countries (2·2%, 1·7–2·8). Despite global growth, per capita health spending was projected to range from only $40 (24–65) to $413 (263–668) in 2040 in low-income countries, and from $140 (90–200) to $1699 (711–3423) in lower-middle-income countries. Globally, the share of health spending covered by pooled resources would range widely, from 19·8% (10·3–38·6) in Nigeria to 97·9% (96·4–98·5) in Seychelles. Historical performance on the UHC index was significantly associated with pooled resources per capita. Across the alternative scenarios, we estimate UHC reaching between 5·1 billion (4·9 billion to 5·3 billion) and 5·6 billion (5·3 billion to 5·8 billion) lives in 2030. Interpretation We chart future scenarios for health spending and its relationship with UHC. Ensuring that all countries have sustainable pooled health resources is crucial to the achievement of UHC. Funding The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                rmhp
                rmhp
                Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
                Dove
                1179-1594
                13 January 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 145-154
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Anilemo District Health Office , Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia
                [2 ]College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University , Harar, Ethiopia
                [3 ]College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University , Hosanna, Ethiopia
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Desta Erkalo College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University , Hosanna, Ethiopia Email erkde12@gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-7636
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-2329
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5981-439X
                Article
                290671
                10.2147/RMHP.S290671
                7812036
                33469397
                e7ffa9ec-9c7b-4d33-97da-38f8a9df4edc
                © 2021 Addise et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 11 November 2020
                : 01 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, References: 18, Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: University did not provide funds;
                There was no funding for this research. The University did not provide funds.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Social policy & Welfare
                community-based health insurance,satisfaction,household heads
                Social policy & Welfare
                community-based health insurance, satisfaction, household heads

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content257

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors236