9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Optimization of Growth Hormone Dosing in Children Born Small for Gestational Age: An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Children during the Fourth Year of Therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Optimal dosage for growth hormone (GH) therapy in short, prepubertal children born small for gestational age (SGA) is controversial. Methods: SGA OPTIMIS (NCT00249821) is a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, pilot study of short children born SGA who had received recombinant human GH (r-hGH) (57 µg/kg/day) for 3 years. Children were randomized 1:1 to receive either 57 or 35 µg/kg/day r-hGH during year 4. The primary endpoint was height gain during year 4. Results: 22 children were randomized (57 µg/kg/day, n = 10; 35 µg/kg/day, n = 12) and 21 completed the fourth year of therapy; 22 were included in efficacy analyses. During year 4, mean [standard deviation (SD)] height velocity was 6.4 (1.4) and 4.4 (1.2) cm/year (p = 0.001) and height velocity SD score (SDS) was 0.3 (0.3) and –0.1 (0.2) (p = 0.002) in the 57 and 35 µg/kg/day groups, respectively. The 57 µg/kg/day group continued with catch-up growth, had a significantly higher mean weight gain (p = 0.015) and significantly higher insulin-like growth factor-I levels at 12 months (p = 0.038). Five treatment-emergent adverse events were reported; none was serious or caused study withdrawal. Conclusions: Children who continued receiving 57 µg/kg/day r-hGH in year 4 had significantly greater height gain than those receiving 35 µg/kg/day r-hGH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board consensus development conference statement: management of short children born small for gestational age, April 24-October 1, 2001.

          To provide pediatric endocrinologists, general pediatricians, neonatologists, and primary care physicians with recommendations for the management of short children born small for gestational age (SGA). A 13-member independent panel of pediatric endocrinologists was convened to discuss relevant issues with respect to definition, diagnosis, and clinical management of short children born SGA. Panel members convened over a series of 3 meetings to thoroughly review, discuss, and come to consensus on the identification and treatment of short children who are born SGA. SGA is defined as birth weight and/or length at least 2 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean for gestational age ( 2 SD below the mean; this catch-up process is usually completed by the time they are 2 years of age. A child who is SGA and older than 3 years and has persistent short stature (ie, remaining at least 2 SD below the mean for chronologic age) is not likely to catch up and should be referred to a pediatrician who has expertise in endocrinology. Bone age is not a reliable predictor of height potential in children who are SGA. Nevertheless, a standard evaluation for short stature should be performed. A diagnosis of SGA does not exclude growth hormone (GH) deficiency, and GH assessment should be performed if there is clinical suspicion or biochemical evidence of GH deficiency. At baseline, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, fasting insulin, glucose, and lipid levels as well as blood pressure should be measured, and all aspects of SGA-not just stature-should be addressed with parents. The objectives of GH therapy in short children who are SGA are catch-up growth in early childhood, maintenance of normal growth in childhood, and achievement of normal adult height. GH therapy is effective and safe in short children who are born SGA and should be considered in those older than 2 to 3 years. There is long-term experience of improved growth using a dosage range from 0.24 to 0.48 mg/kg/wk. Higher GH doses (0.48 mg/kg/wk [0.2 IU/kg/d]) are more effective for the short term. Whether the higher GH dose is more efficacious than the lower dose in terms of adult height results is not yet known. Only adult height results of randomized dose-response studies will give a definite answer. Monitoring is necessary to ensure safety of medication. Children should be monitored for changes in glucose homeostasis, lipids, and blood pressure during therapy. The frequency and intensity of monitoring will vary depending on risk factors such as family history, obesity, and puberty.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adult height after long-term, continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children born small for gestational age: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial.

            The GH dose-response effect of long-term continuous GH treatment on adult height (AH) was evaluated in 54 short children born small for gestational age (SGA) who were participating in a randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial. Patients were randomly and blindly assigned to treatment with either 3 IU (group A) or 6 IU (group B) GH/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 or 0.067 mg/kg.d, respectively). The mean (+/-SD) birth length was -3.6 (1.4), the age at the start of the study was 8.1 (1.9) yr, and the height SD score (SDS) at the start of the study -3.0 (0.7). Seventeen of the 54 children were partially GH deficient (stimulated GH peak, 10-20 mU/liter). Fifteen non-GH-treated, non-GH-deficient, short children born SGA, with similar inclusion criteria, served as controls [mean (+/-SD) birth length, -3.3 (1.2); age at start, 7.8 (1.7) yr; height SDS at start, -2.6 (0.5)]. GH treatment resulted in an AH above -2 SDS in 85% of the children after a mean (+/-SD) GH treatment period of 7.8 (1.7) yr. The mean (SD) AH SDS was -1.1 (0.7) for group A and -0.9 (0.8) for group B, resulting from a mean (+/-SD) gain in height SDS of 1.8 (0.7) for group A and 2.1 (0.8) for group B. No significant differences between groups A and B were found for AH SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.2, 0.6; P > 0.2) and gain in height SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.1, 0.7; P > 0.1). When corrected for target height, the mean corrected AH SDS was -0.2 (0.8) for group A and -0.4 (0.9) for group B. The mean (+/-SD) AH SDS of the control group [-2.3 (0.7)] was significantly lower than that of the GH-treated group (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated the following predictive variables for AH SDS: target height SDS, height SDS, and chronological age minus bone age (years) at the start of the study. GH dose had no significant effect. In conclusion, long-term continuous GH treatment in short children born SGA without signs of persistent catch-up growth leads to a normalization of AH, even with a GH dose of 3 IU/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 mg/kg.d).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Insulin growth factor-based dosing of growth hormone therapy in children: a randomized, controlled study.

              Weight-based dosing of GH is the standard of care for short children, although IGF-I is thought to be the main mediator of GH actions on growth. The objective of the study was to test whether IGF-I levels achieved during GH therapy are determinants of the growth responses to GH treatment. This was a 2-yr, open-label, randomized, IGF-I concentration-controlled trial. Prepubertal short children [n = 172, mean age 7.53 yr, mean height sd score (HT-SDS) -2.64] with low IGF-I levels (mean IGF-I SDS -3.56) were randomized to receive one of two GH dose-titration arms in which GH dosage was titrated to achieve an IGF-I SDS at the mean [IGF((low)) group, n = 70] or the upper limit of the normal range [+2 SDS, IGF((high)) group, n = 68] or to a comparison group of conventional GH dose of 40 microg/kg/d (n = 34). The study was conducted in a multicenter, outpatient setting. Change in HT-SDS over 2 yr was measured. One hundred forty-seven patients completed the trial. Target IGF-I levels were achieved in the dose-titration arms within 6-9 months. The changes in HT-SDS were +1.0, +1.1, and +1.6 for conventional, IGF((low)), and IGF((high)), respectively, with IGF((high)) showing significantly greater linear growth response (P 2.5 times) than the IGF((low)) arm, and these GH doses were highly variable (20-346 microg/kg/d). Multivariate analyses suggested that the rise in the IGF-I SDS significantly impacted height outcome along with the GH dose and the pretreatment peak-stimulated GH level. IGF-I-based GH dosing is clinically feasible and allows maintaining serum IGF-I concentrations within the desired target range. Titrating the GH dose to achieve higher IGF-I targets results in improved growth responses, although at higher average GH doses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRP
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2012
                May 2012
                12 April 2012
                : 77
                : 3
                : 156-163
                Affiliations
                aDépartement de Pédiatrie, Hôpital Mère-enfant de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, bMerck Serono SAS, et cHôpital Femme-mère-enfant, Lyon, dCentre d’Endocrinologie pédiatrique, Bordeaux, eGroupe Hospitalier du Havre, Le Havre, fHôpital d’Archet II, Nice, et gHôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France
                Author notes
                *Pierre Chatelain, Service d’Endocrinologie et Diabétologie Pédiatriques, Hôpital Mère-enfant de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, 59 Boulevard Pinel, FR–69677 Bron Cedex (France), Tel. +33 472 129 526, E-Mail pierre.chatelain@chu-lyon.fr
                Article
                337216 Horm Res Paediatr 2012;77:156–163
                10.1159/000337216
                22508151
                e8732669-3316-485b-968b-805d84c4ec97
                © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 14 September 2011
                : 07 February 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Growth hormone,Small for gestational age,Catch-up growth,Pediatric growth hormone therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article