Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Feasibility, utility, and safety of fully incorporating transesophageal echocardiography into emergency medicine practice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a standard procedure for emergency physicians (EPs). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is known to have great utility in patients who are critically ill or in cardiac arrest and has been used by some EPs with specialized ultrasound (US) training, but it is generally considered outside the reach of the majority of EPs. We surmised that all of our EPs could learn to perform focused TEE (F‐TEE), so we trained and credentialed all of the physicians in our group.

          Methods

          We trained 52 EPs to perform and interpret F‐TEEs using a 4‐h simulator‐based course. We kept a database of all F‐TEE examinations for quality assurance and continuous quality feedback. Data are reported using descriptive statistics.

          Results

          Emergency physicians attempted 557 total F‐TEE examinations (median = 10, interquartile range = 5–15) during the 42‐month period following training. Clinically relevant images were obtained in 99% of patients. EPs without fellowship or other advanced US training performed the majority of F‐TEEs (417, 74.9%) and 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91.4%–96.3%) had interpretable images recorded. When TTE and TEE were both performed ( n = 410), image quality of TEE was superior in 378 (93.3%, 95% CI = 89.7%–95%). Indications for F‐TEE included periarrest states (55.7%), cardiac arrest (32.1%), and shock (12.2%). There was one case of endotracheal tube dislodgement during TEE placement, but this was immediately identified and replaced without complication.

          Conclusion

          After initiating a mandatory group F‐TEE training and credentialing program, we report the largest series to date of EP‐performed resuscitative F‐TEE. The majority of F‐TEE examinations (75%) were performed by EPs without advanced US training beyond residency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients.

          We examined a physician-performed, goal-directed ultrasound protocol for the emergency department management of nontraumatic, symptomatic, undifferentiated hypotension. Randomized, controlled trial of immediate vs. delayed ultrasound. Urban, tertiary emergency department, census >100,000. Nontrauma emergency department patients, aged >17 yrs, and initial emergency department vital signs consistent with shock (systolic blood pressure 1.0), and agreement of two independent observers for at least one sign and symptom of inadequate tissue perfusion. Group 1 (immediate ultrasound) received standard care plus goal-directed ultrasound at time 0. Group 2 (delayed ultrasound) received standard care for 15 mins and goal-directed ultrasound with standard care between 15 and 30 mins after time 0. Outcomes included the number of viable physician diagnoses at 15 mins and the rank of their likelihood of occurrence at both 15 and 30 mins. One hundred eighty-four patients were included. Group 1 (n = 88) had a smaller median number of viable diagnoses at 15 mins (median = 4) than did group 2 (n = 96, median = 9, Mann-Whitney U test, p <.0001). Physicians indicated the correct final diagnosis as most likely among their viable diagnosis list at 15 mins in 80% (95% confidence interval, 70-87%) of group 1 subjects vs. 50% (95% confidence interval, 40-60%) in group 2, difference of 30% (95% confidence interval, 16-42%). Incorporation of a goal-directed ultrasound protocol in the evaluation of nontraumatic, symptomatic, undifferentiated hypotension in adult patients results in fewer viable diagnostic etiologies and a more accurate physician impression of final diagnosis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety of transesophageal echocardiography.

            Since its introduction into the operating room in the early 1980s, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has gained widespread use during cardiac, major vascular, and transplantation surgery, as well as in emergency and intensive care medicine. Moreover, TEE has become an invaluable diagnostic tool for the management of patients with cardiovascular disease in a nonoperative setting. In comparison with other diagnostic modalities, TEE is relatively safe and noninvasive. However, the insertion and manipulation of the ultrasound probe can cause oropharyngeal, esophageal, or gastric trauma. Here, the authors review the safety profile of TEE by identifying complications and propose a set of relative and absolute contraindications to probe placement. In addition, alternative echocardiographic modalities (e.g., epicardial echocardiography) that may be considered when TEE probe placement is contraindicated or not feasible are discussed. Copyright © 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound.

              Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is a simplified, clinician-performed application of echocardiography that is rapidly expanding in use, especially in emergency and critical care medicine. Performed by appropriately trained clinicians, typically not cardiologists, FoCUS ascertains the essential information needed in critical scenarios for time-sensitive clinical decision making. A need exists for quality evidence-based review and clinical recommendations on its use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rfreardon@gmail.com
                Journal
                Acad Emerg Med
                Acad Emerg Med
                10.1111/(ISSN)1553-2712
                ACEM
                Academic Emergency Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1069-6563
                1553-2712
                06 November 2021
                March 2022
                : 29
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/acem.v29.3 )
                : 334-343
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Emergency Medicine Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis Minnesota USA
                [ 2 ] Glacial Ridge Health System Glenwood Minnesota USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Emergency Medicine Hennepin County Medical Center & University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Robert F. Reardon, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA.

                Email: rfreardon@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-9614
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0748-9972
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-6426
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-9931
                Article
                ACEM14399
                10.1111/acem.14399
                9298053
                34644420
                e9199489-8f32-48df-973c-b6beb3ec4c88
                © 2021 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 September 2021
                : 08 June 2021
                : 19 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Pages: 10, Words: 18066
                Categories
                Original Contribution
                Original Contributions
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:20.07.2022

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article