34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      FAM-MDR: A Flexible Family-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Technique to Detect Epistasis Using Related Individuals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We propose a novel multifactor dimensionality reduction method for epistasis detection in small or extended pedigrees, FAM-MDR. It combines features of the Genome-wide Rapid Association using Mixed Model And Regression approach (GRAMMAR) with Model-Based MDR (MB-MDR). We focus on continuous traits, although the method is general and can be used for outcomes of any type, including binary and censored traits. When comparing FAM-MDR with Pedigree-based Generalized MDR (PGMDR), which is a generalization of Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) to continuous traits and related individuals, FAM-MDR was found to outperform PGMDR in terms of power, in most of the considered simulated scenarios. Additional simulations revealed that PGMDR does not appropriately deal with multiple testing and consequently gives rise to overly optimistic results. FAM-MDR adequately deals with multiple testing in epistasis screens and is in contrast rather conservative, by construction. Furthermore, simulations show that correcting for lower order (main) effects is of utmost importance when claiming epistasis. As Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a complex phenotype likely influenced by gene-gene interactions, we applied FAM-MDR to examine data on glucose area-under-the-curve (GAUC), an endophenotype of T2DM for which multiple independent genetic associations have been observed, in the Amish Family Diabetes Study (AFDS). This application reveals that FAM-MDR makes more efficient use of the available data than PGMDR and can deal with multi-generational pedigrees more easily. In conclusion, we have validated FAM-MDR and compared it to PGMDR, the current state-of-the-art MDR method for family data, using both simulations and a practical dataset. FAM-MDR is found to outperform PGMDR in that it handles the multiple testing issue more correctly, has increased power, and efficiently uses all available information.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A genome-wide association study of global gene expression.

            We have created a global map of the effects of polymorphism on gene expression in 400 children from families recruited through a proband with asthma. We genotyped 408,273 SNPs and identified expression quantitative trait loci from measurements of 54,675 transcripts representing 20,599 genes in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines. We found that 15,084 transcripts (28%) representing 6,660 genes had narrow-sense heritabilities (H2) > 0.3. We executed genome-wide association scans for these traits and found peak lod scores between 3.68 and 59.1. The most highly heritable traits were markedly enriched in Gene Ontology descriptors for response to unfolded protein (chaperonins and heat shock proteins), regulation of progression through the cell cycle, RNA processing, DNA repair, immune responses and apoptosis. SNPs that regulate expression of these genes are candidates in the study of degenerative diseases, malignancy, infection and inflammation. We have created a downloadable database to facilitate use of our findings in the mapping of complex disease loci.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease.

              Association studies offer a potentially powerful approach to identify genetic variants that influence susceptibility to common disease, but are plagued by the impression that they are not consistently reproducible. In principle, the inconsistency may be due to false positive studies, false negative studies or true variability in association among different populations. The critical question is whether false positives overwhelmingly explain the inconsistency. We analyzed 301 published studies covering 25 different reported associations. There was a large excess of studies replicating the first positive reports, inconsistent with the hypothesis of no true positive associations (P < 10(-14)). This excess of replications could not be reasonably explained by publication bias and was concentrated among 11 of the 25 associations. For 8 of these 11 associations, pooled analysis of follow-up studies yielded statistically significant replication of the first report, with modest estimated genetic effects. Thus, a sizable fraction (but under half) of reported associations have strong evidence of replication; for these, false negative, underpowered studies probably contribute to inconsistent replication. We conclude that there are probably many common variants in the human genome with modest but real effects on common disease risk, and that studies using large samples will convincingly identify such variants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2010
                22 April 2010
                : 5
                : 4
                : e10304
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Montefiore Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
                [2 ]Groupe Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliquée - Research, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
                [3 ]Department of Systems Biology, University of Vic, Vic, Spain
                [4 ]Miami Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America
                [5 ]Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
                [6 ]School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
                [7 ]Center for Human Genetics Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
                VU University Medical Center and Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MF HS. Performed the experiments: MF HS. Analyzed the data: TC ACN TLE KVS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TC VU VDW MF JMMJ HS MLC KVS. Wrote the paper: TC ACN JMMJ MLC MDR TLE KVS. Developed the method: TC LDL VDW JMMJ KVS. Designed the simulation study: TC KVS. Performed the simulation study: TC KVS.

                Article
                10-PONE-RA-15469R1
                10.1371/journal.pone.0010304
                2858665
                20421984
                e94c1040-73f0-4108-9324-7ee6475cfef1
                Cattaert et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 12 January 2010
                : 1 March 2010
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Categories
                Research Article
                Genetics and Genomics/Bioinformatics
                Genetics and Genomics/Complex Traits
                Diabetes and Endocrinology/Type 2 Diabetes

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article