10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera

      ,
      Urban Ecosystems
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers.

              Urbanization contributes to the loss of the world's biodiversity and the homogenization of its biota. However, comparative studies of urban biodiversity leading to robust generalities of the status and drivers of biodiversity in cities at the global scale are lacking. Here, we compiled the largest global dataset to date of two diverse taxa in cities: birds (54 cities) and plants (110 cities). We found that the majority of urban bird and plant species are native in the world's cities. Few plants and birds are cosmopolitan, the most common being Columba livia and Poa annua. The density of bird and plant species (the number of species per km(2)) has declined substantially: only 8% of native bird and 25% of native plant species are currently present compared with estimates of non-urban density of species. The current density of species in cities and the loss in density of species was best explained by anthropogenic features (landcover, city age) rather than by non-anthropogenic factors (geography, climate, topography). As urbanization continues to expand, efforts directed towards the conservation of intact vegetation within urban landscapes could support higher concentrations of both bird and plant species. Despite declines in the density of species, cities still retain endemic native species, thus providing opportunities for regional and global biodiversity conservation, restoration and education.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Urban Ecosystems
                Urban Ecosyst
                Springer Nature
                1083-8155
                1573-1642
                February 2017
                July 11 2016
                February 2017
                : 20
                : 1
                : 171-182
                Article
                10.1007/s11252-016-0579-4
                ea2067e6-a3bd-4562-ba5e-eb9592ea0d6f
                © 2017

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article