42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Balancing trade-offs between biotic and abiotic stress responses through leaf age-dependent variation in stress hormone cross-talk

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Plants are exposed to conflicting stresses simultaneously in nature. As stress responses are costly, plants likely coordinate these responses to minimize fitness costs. The nature and extent to which plants employ inducible mechanisms to cope with combined physical and biological stresses remains unknown. We identify a genetic mechanism by which leaves of distinct ages differentially control stress-response cross-talk. At the organism level, this mechanism balances stress-response trade-offs to maintain plant growth and reproduction during combined stresses. We also show that this leaf age-dependent stress-response prioritization influences the establishment of plant-associated leaf bacterial communities. This study illustrates the importance of active balancing of stress-response trade-offs for plant fitness maintenance and for interaction with the plant microbiota.

          Abstract

          In nature, plants must respond to multiple stresses simultaneously, which likely demands cross-talk between stress-response pathways to minimize fitness costs. Here we provide genetic evidence that biotic and abiotic stress responses are differentially prioritized in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves of different ages to maintain growth and reproduction under combined biotic and abiotic stresses. Abiotic stresses, such as high salinity and drought, blunted immune responses in older rosette leaves through the phytohormone abscisic acid signaling, whereas this antagonistic effect was blocked in younger rosette leaves by PBS3, a signaling component of the defense phytohormone salicylic acid. Plants lacking PBS3 exhibited enhanced abiotic stress tolerance at the cost of decreased fitness under combined biotic and abiotic stresses. Together with this role, PBS3 is also indispensable for the establishment of salt stress- and leaf age-dependent phyllosphere bacterial communities. Collectively, our work reveals a mechanism that balances trade-offs upon conflicting stresses at the organism level and identifies a genetic intersection among plant immunity, leaf microbiota, and abiotic stress tolerance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence.

          Salicylic acid (SA) mediates plant defences against pathogens, accumulating in both infected and distal leaves in response to pathogen attack. Pathogenesis-related gene expression and the synthesis of defensive compounds associated with both local and systemic acquired resistance (LAR and SAR) in plants require SA. In Arabidopsis, exogenous application of SA suffices to establish SAR, resulting in enhanced resistance to a variety of pathogens. However, despite its importance in plant defence against pathogens, SA biosynthesis is not well defined. Previous work has suggested that plants synthesize SA from phenylalanine; however, SA could still be produced when this pathway was inhibited, and the specific activity of radiolabelled SA in feeding experiments was often lower than expected. Some bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa synthesize SA using isochorismate synthase (ICS) and pyruvate lyase. Here we show, by cloning and characterizing an Arabidopsis defence-related gene (SID2) defined by mutation, that SA is synthesized from chorismate by means of ICS, and that SA made by this pathway is required for LAR and SAR responses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3.

            SPL3, SPL4 and SPL5 (SPL3/4/5) are closely related members of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis, and have a target site for the microRNA miR156 in their 3' UTR. The phenotype of Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing miR156-sensitive and miR156-insensitive forms of SPL3/4/5 revealed that all three genes promote vegetative phase change and flowering, and are strongly repressed by miR156. Constitutive expression of miR156a prolonged the expression of juvenile vegetative traits and delayed flowering. This phenotype was largely corrected by constitutive expression of a miR156-insensitive form of SPL3. The juvenile-to-adult transition is accompanied by a decrease in the level of miR156 and an increase in the abundance of SPL3 mRNA. The complementary effect of hasty on the miR156 and SPL3 transcripts, as well as the miR156-dependent temporal expression pattern of a 35S::GUS-SPL3 transgene, suggest that the decrease in miR156 is responsible for the increase in SPL3 expression during this transition. SPL3 mRNA is elevated by mutations in ZIPPY/AGO7, RNA DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 6 (RDR6) and SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3), indicating that it is directly or indirectly regulated by RNAi. However, our results indicate that RNAi does not contribute to the temporal expression pattern of this gene. We conclude that vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis is regulated by an increase in the expression of SPL3 and probably also SPL4 and SPL5, and that this increase is a consequence of a decrease in the level of miR156.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation.

              A myriad of drought stress-inducible genes have been reported, and many of these are activated by abscisic acid (ABA). In the promoter regions of such ABA-regulated genes, conserved cis-elements, designated ABA-responsive elements (ABREs), control gene expression via bZIP-type AREB/ABF transcription factors. Although all three members of the AREB/ABF subfamily, AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3, are upregulated by ABA and water stress, it remains unclear whether these are functional homologs. Here, we report that all three AREB/ABF transcription factors require ABA for full activation, can form hetero- or homodimers to function in nuclei, and can interact with SRK2D/SnRK2.2, an SnRK2 protein kinase that was identified as a regulator of AREB1. Along with the tissue-specific expression patterns of these genes and the subcellular localization of their encoded proteins, these findings clearly indicate that AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 have largely overlapping functions. To elucidate the role of these AREB/ABF transcription factors, we generated an areb1 areb2 abf3 triple mutant. Large-scale transcriptome analysis, which showed that stress-responsive gene expression is remarkably impaired in the triple mutant, revealed novel AREB/ABF downstream genes in response to water stress, including many LEA class and group-Ab PP2C genes and transcription factors. The areb1 areb2 abf3 triple mutant is more resistant to ABA than are the other single and double mutants with respect to primary root growth, and it displays reduced drought tolerance. Thus, these results indicate that AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent gene expression for ABA signaling under conditions of water stress.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                5 February 2019
                23 January 2019
                23 January 2019
                : 116
                : 6
                : 2364-2373
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research , 50829 Cologne, Germany;
                [2] bDepartment of Molecular Signal Processing, Leibnitz Institute of Plant Biochemistry , 06120 Halle, Germany;
                [3] cCluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research , 50829 Cologne, Germany
                Author notes
                4To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: schlef@ 123456mpipz.mpg.de or tsuda@ 123456mpipz.mpg.de .

                Contributed by Paul Schulze-Lefert, December 10, 2018 (sent for review October 8, 2018; reviewed by Xinnian Dong and Murray R. Grant)

                Author contributions: M.L.B., P.S.-L., and K.T. designed research; M.L.B., K.W.W., J.Z., A.N., V.K., T.M.W., Y.W., and D.B. performed research; R.G.-O. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.L.B., K.W.W., S.S., J.Z., T.N., T.M.W., A.M., P.S.-L., and K.T. analyzed data; and M.L.B., P.S.-L., and K.T. wrote the paper.

                Reviewers: X.D., Duke University; and M.R.G., University of Warwick.

                1Present address: Albrecht-von-Haller-Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, D–37073 Göttingen, Germany.

                2Present address: Institut für Biologie und Biotechnologie der Pflanzen, Westfälische Wilhelms Universität, 48149 Münster, Germany.

                3Present address: Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, 525-8577 Shiga, Japan.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-9039
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-0731
                Article
                201817233
                10.1073/pnas.1817233116
                6369802
                30674663
                ea48ae9b-27fb-4835-bb00-f12c7cdd4e1b
                Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: European Research Council
                Award ID: ROOTMICROBIOTA
                Award Recipient : Paul Schulze-Lefert
                Categories
                PNAS Plus
                Biological Sciences
                Plant Biology
                PNAS Plus

                combined stress,phytohormone,plant fitness,microbiota,stress trade-off

                Comments

                Comment on this article