2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Voluntary Statewide Newborn Screening Pilot for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Results from Early Check

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prior to statewide newborn screening (NBS) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in North Carolina, U.S.A., we offered voluntary screening through the Early Check (EC) research study. Here, we describe the EC experience from October 2018 through December 2020. We enrolled a total of 12,065 newborns and identified one newborn with 0 copies of SMN1 and two copies of SMN2, consistent with severe early onset of SMA. We also detected one false positive result, likely stemming from an unrelated blood disorder associated with a low white blood cell count. We evaluated the timing of NBS for babies enrolled prenatally ( n = 932) and postnatally ( n = 11,133) and reasons for delays in screening and reporting. Although prenatal enrollment led to faster return of results (median = 13 days after birth), results for babies enrolled postnatally were still available within a timeframe (median = 21 days after birth) that allowed the opportunity to receive essential treatment early in life. We evaluated an SMA q-PCR screening method at two separate time points, confirming the robustness of the assay. The pilot project provided important information about SMA screening in anticipation of forthcoming statewide expansion as part of regular NBS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Clinical Evidence Supporting Early Treatment Of Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Current Perspectives

          Abstract Recent advances in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have dramatically altered prognosis. Rather than a rapidly lethal disease, SMA type 1, the most severe form with the earliest onset of SMA, has become a disease in which long-term event-free survival with the acquisition of important motor milestones is likely. Prognosis for patients with SMA type 2 has shifted from slow and progressive deterioration to long-term stability. Nevertheless, there is a large heterogeneity in terms of clinical response to currently available treatments, ranging from absence of response to impressive improvement. The only factor identified that is predictive of treatment success is the age of the patient at the initiation of treatment, which is closely related to disease duration. The aim of this paper is to review available evidence that support early intervention using currently available treatment approaches.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An update of the mutation spectrum of the survival motor neuron gene (SMN1) in autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).

            B. Wirth (2000)
            Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is characterized by degeneration of motor neurons in the spinal cord, causing progressive weakness of the limbs and trunk, followed by muscle atrophy. SMA is one of the most frequent autosomal recessive diseases, with a carrier frequency of 1 in 50 and the most common genetic cause of childhood mortality. The phenotype is extremely variable, and patients have been classified in type I-III SMA based on age at onset and clinical course. All three types of SMA are caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron gene (SMN1). There are two almost identical copies, SMN1 and SMN2, present on chromosome 5q13. Only homozygous absence of SMN1 is responsible for SMA, while homozygous absence of SMN2, found in about 5% of controls, has no clinical phenotype. Ninety-six percent of SMA patients display mutations in SMN1, while 4% are unlinked to 5q13. Of the 5q13-linked SMA patients, 96.4% show homozygous absence of SMN1 exons 7 and 8 or exon 7 only, whereas 3. 6% present a compound heterozygosity with a subtle mutation on one chromosome and a deletion/gene conversion on the other chromosome. Among the 23 different subtle mutations described so far, the Y272C missense mutation is the most frequent one, at 20%. Given this uniform mutation spectrum, direct molecular genetic testing is an easy and rapid analysis for most of the SMA patients. Direct testing of heterozygotes, while not trivial, is compromised by the presence of two SMN1 copies per chromosome in about 4% of individuals. The number of SMN2 copies modulates the SMA phenotype. Nevertheless, it should not be used for prediction of severity of the SMA. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adeno-associated virus antibody profiles in newborns, children, and adolescents.

              Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector due to previous natural infection with wild-type AAV can significantly limit gene transfer. NAb titers to AAV serotype 2 (AAV2) and AAV8 in human subjects (0 to 18 years) were studied. NAb prevalence is moderate at birth, decreases markedly from 7 to 11 months, and then progressively increases through childhood and adolescence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Neonatal Screen
                Int J Neonatal Screen
                IJNS
                International Journal of Neonatal Screening
                MDPI
                2409-515X
                21 March 2021
                March 2021
                : 7
                : 1
                : 20
                Affiliations
                [1 ]RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA; vrobles@ 123456rti.org (V.R.R.); bmigliore@ 123456rti.org (B.M.); mlincolnboyea@ 123456rti.org (B.L.B.); kokoniewski@ 123456rti.org (K.C.O.); mduparc@ 123456rti.org (M.D.); mraspa@ 123456rti.org (M.R.); hpeay@ 123456rti.org (H.L.P.); acwheeler@ 123456rti.org (A.C.W.); dbailey@ 123456rti.org (D.B.B.J.); lgehtland@ 123456rti.org (L.M.G.)
                [2 ]American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; jtaylor@ 123456acmg.net
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7487, USA; kclinard@ 123456email.unc.edu
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA; catherine.rehder@ 123456duke.edu
                [5 ]North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA; scott.shone@ 123456dhhs.nc.gov
                [6 ]Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; zheng_fan@ 123456med.unc.edu
                [7 ]Department of Pediatrics and Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7487, USA; powellcm@ 123456med.unc.edu
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: kkucera@ 123456rti.org ; Tel.: +01-919-704-0562
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4148-6599
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6942-1696
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-8016
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-6331
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3791-3367
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-9330
                Article
                IJNS-07-00020
                10.3390/ijns7010020
                8006221
                33801060
                ea5617c5-b530-4893-b103-c13f0db467de
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 January 2021
                : 15 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                newborn screening,spinal muscular atrophy,genetics,smn1 gene,pilot study

                Comments

                Comment on this article