9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Differentiating rapid- and slow-growing mycobacteria by difference in time to growth detection in liquid media.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are classified into 2 categories: slow-growing mycobacteria (SGM) and rapid-growing mycobacteria (RGM), based on interval to colony formation by subculture on solid media. However, little is known about the growth rate of NTM in liquid broth media. We evaluated the differences in time to growth detection (TGD) of RGM and SGM in liquid broth media according to acid-fast stain. Among the 696 NTM isolates, 201 were RGM and 495 were SGM. In acid-fast bacilli (AFB)-negative specimens, the mean TGD was 133 h for RGM and 269 h for SGM (P < 0.001). In AFB-positive specimens, the mean TGD was 112 ± 37 h for RGM and 155 ± 125 h for SGM (P = 0.063). In the AFB-negative group, a cut-off value of 6 days was most effective for distinguishing SGM from RGM; however, in the AFB-positive group, an appropriate cut-off value was hard to define with TGD only.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
          Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
          Elsevier BV
          1879-0070
          0732-8893
          Jan 2013
          : 75
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea.
          Article
          S0732-8893(12)00397-5
          10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.09.019
          23114094
          eab701ba-ae42-44e4-b5e1-7ea8e409b0a6
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article