127
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial

      research-article
      , Prof, PhD a , b , , MSc c , * , , Prof, ChM d , , Prof, MD e , , Prof, MD f , , MSc c , , MD c , , MD f , , FRCR g , , MD PhD f , , Prof, PhD f , , PhD h , , Prof, PhD g , , Prof, MD i , , PhD c , , PhD j , j , , FRCR k , , FRCR l , , MD m , , FRCR n , , MD o , , FRCR p , , MD q , , FRCR r , , PhD s , , DM t , , FRCR u , , FRCP v , , FRCS[Eng] w , , FRCR x , , FRCR y , , FRCR z , , FRCR, FRCP[Ed] aa , , Prof, MD ab , , FRCR ac , , FRCR ad , , PhD ae , , FRCR af , , MD ag , , FRCR ah , , MD e , , FRCR ai , , MD aj , , MCRP ak , , Prof, MD al , , Prof, DPhil c
      Lancet (London, England)
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Long-term hormone therapy has been the standard of care for advanced prostate cancer since the 1940s. STAMPEDE is a randomised controlled trial using a multiarm, multistage platform design. It recruits men with high-risk, locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent prostate cancer who are starting first-line long-term hormone therapy. We report primary survival results for three research comparisons testing the addition of zoledronic acid, docetaxel, or their combination to standard of care versus standard of care alone.

          Methods

          Standard of care was hormone therapy for at least 2 years; radiotherapy was encouraged for men with N0M0 disease to November, 2011, then mandated; radiotherapy was optional for men with node-positive non-metastatic (N+M0) disease. Stratified randomisation (via minimisation) allocated men 2:1:1:1 to standard of care only (SOC-only; control), standard of care plus zoledronic acid (SOC + ZA), standard of care plus docetaxel (SOC + Doc), or standard of care with both zoledronic acid and docetaxel (SOC + ZA + Doc). Zoledronic acid (4 mg) was given for six 3-weekly cycles, then 4-weekly until 2 years, and docetaxel (75 mg/m 2) for six 3-weekly cycles with prednisolone 10 mg daily. There was no blinding to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Pairwise comparisons of research versus control had 90% power at 2·5% one-sided α for hazard ratio (HR) 0·75, requiring roughly 400 control arm deaths. Statistical analyses were undertaken with standard log-rank-type methods for time-to-event data, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs derived from adjusted Cox models. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00268476) and ControlledTrials.com (ISRCTN78818544).

          Findings

          2962 men were randomly assigned to four groups between Oct 5, 2005, and March 31, 2013. Median age was 65 years (IQR 60–71). 1817 (61%) men had M+ disease, 448 (15%) had N+/X M0, and 697 (24%) had N0M0. 165 (6%) men were previously treated with local therapy, and median prostate-specific antigen was 65 ng/mL (IQR 23–184). Median follow-up was 43 months (IQR 30–60). There were 415 deaths in the control group (347 [84%] prostate cancer). Median overall survival was 71 months (IQR 32 to not reached) for SOC-only, not reached (32 to not reached) for SOC + ZA (HR 0·94, 95% CI 0·79–1·11; p=0·450), 81 months (41 to not reached) for SOC + Doc (0·78, 0·66–0·93; p=0·006), and 76 months (39 to not reached) for SOC + ZA + Doc (0·82, 0·69–0·97; p=0·022). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect (for any of the treatments) across prespecified subsets. Grade 3–5 adverse events were reported for 399 (32%) patients receiving SOC, 197 (32%) receiving SOC + ZA, 288 (52%) receiving SOC + Doc, and 269 (52%) receiving SOC + ZA + Doc.

          Interpretation

          Zoledronic acid showed no evidence of survival improvement and should not be part of standard of care for this population. Docetaxel chemotherapy, given at the time of long-term hormone therapy initiation, showed evidence of improved survival accompanied by an increase in adverse events. Docetaxel treatment should become part of standard of care for adequately fit men commencing long-term hormone therapy.

          Funding

          Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer, Janssen, Astellas, NIHR Clinical Research Network, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

          Sipuleucel-T, an autologous active cellular immunotherapy, has shown evidence of efficacy in reducing the risk of death among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 512 patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive either sipuleucel-T (341 patients) or placebo (171 patients) administered intravenously every 2 weeks, for a total of three infusions. The primary end point was overall survival, analyzed by means of a stratified Cox regression model adjusted for baseline levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and lactate dehydrogenase. In the sipuleucel-T group, there was a relative reduction of 22% in the risk of death as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.98; P=0.03). This reduction represented a 4.1-month improvement in median survival (25.8 months in the sipuleucel-T group vs. 21.7 months in the placebo group). The 36-month survival probability was 31.7% in the sipuleucel-T group versus 23.0% in the placebo group. The treatment effect was also observed with the use of an unadjusted Cox model and a log-rank test (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.97; P=0.02) and after adjustment for use of docetaxel after the study therapy (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.98; P=0.03). The time to objective disease progression was similar in the two study groups. Immune responses to the immunizing antigen were observed in patients who received sipuleucel-T. Adverse events that were more frequently reported in the sipuleucel-T group than in the placebo group included chills, fever, and headache. The use of sipuleucel-T prolonged overall survival among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. No effect on the time to disease progression was observed. (Funded by Dendreon; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00065442.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy.

            Enzalutamide (formerly called MDV3100) targets multiple steps in the androgen-receptor-signaling pathway, the major driver of prostate-cancer growth. We aimed to evaluate whether enzalutamide prolongs survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy. In our phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we stratified 1199 men with castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score and pain intensity. We randomly assigned them, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive oral enzalutamide at a dose of 160 mg per day (800 patients) or placebo (399 patients). The primary end point was overall survival. The study was stopped after a planned interim analysis at the time of 520 deaths. The median overall survival was 18.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3 to not yet reached) in the enzalutamide group versus 13.6 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.8) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death in the enzalutamide group, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.75; P<0.001). The superiority of enzalutamide over placebo was shown with respect to all secondary end points: the proportion of patients with a reduction in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level by 50% or more (54% vs. 2%, P<0.001), the soft-tissue response rate (29% vs. 4%, P<0.001), the quality-of-life response rate (43% vs. 18%, P<0.001), the time to PSA progression (8.3 vs. 3.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.25; P<0.001), radiographic progression-free survival (8.3 vs. 2.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.40; P<0.001), and the time to the first skeletal-related event (16.7 vs. 13.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.69; P<0.001). Rates of fatigue, diarrhea, and hot flashes were higher in the enzalutamide group. Seizures were reported in five patients (0.6%) receiving enzalutamide. Enzalutamide significantly prolonged the survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy. (Funded by Medivation and Astellas Pharma Global Development; AFFIRM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00974311.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

              Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the backbone of treatment for metastatic prostate cancer since the 1940s. We assessed whether concomitant treatment with ADT plus docetaxel would result in longer overall survival than that with ADT alone.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                19 March 2016
                19 March 2016
                : 387
                : 10024
                : 1163-1177
                Affiliations
                [a ]Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
                [b ]University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
                [c ]MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
                [d ]Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
                [e ]Cardiff University School of Medicine, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, UK
                [f ]The Institute of Cancer Research & Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [g ]Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
                [h ]Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
                [i ]Department of Urology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
                [j ]Patient rep, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
                [k ]Department of Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield & Doncaster, UK
                [l ]Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK
                [m ]Department of Oncology, Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
                [n ]Department of Oncology, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Royal Bournemouth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chur, Switzerland
                [o ]Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
                [p ]Department of Oncology, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
                [q ]Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
                [r ]Department of Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital & Hereford County Hospital, UK
                [s ]Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
                [t ]Oncology and Haematology Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
                [u ]Department of Oncology, Queen's Hospital, Romford, UK
                [v ]Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
                [w ]Department of Urology, Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
                [x ]Mount Vernon Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
                [y ]Department of Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
                [z ]Department of Oncology, East Sussex Hospitals Trust, East Sussex, UK
                [aa ]Department of Oncology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
                [ab ]Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast/Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
                [ac ]Department of Oncology, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, East Lancashire, UK
                [ad ]Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, South Tees NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
                [ae ]Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
                [af ]Department of Oncology, Sussex Cancer Centre, Brighton, UK
                [ag ]Department of Oncology, Shrewsbury & Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
                [ah ]Department of Oncology, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK/Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK
                [ai ]Department of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS trust, Nottingham, UK
                [aj ]Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK
                [ak ]Department of Oncology, Southend & Basildon Hospitals, Essex, UK
                [al ]The South West Wales Cancer Institute and Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Mr Matthew R Sydes, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London WC2B 6NH, UKCorrespondence to: Mr Matthew R SydesMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCLLondonWC2B 6NHUK m.sydes@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                [†]

                Members listed at end of paper

                Article
                S0140-6736(15)01037-5
                10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01037-5
                4800035
                26719232
                eb0838dc-45c6-4ffc-81b0-2f9a47d6ddec
                © 2016 James et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article