107
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health system context and implementation of evidence-based practices—development and validation of the Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool for low- and middle-income settings

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The gap between what is known and what is practiced results in health service users not benefitting from advances in healthcare, and in unnecessary costs. A supportive context is considered a key element for successful implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP). There were no tools available for the systematic mapping of aspects of organizational context influencing the implementation of EBPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Thus, this project aimed to develop and psychometrically validate a tool for this purpose.

          Methods

          The development of the Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool was premised on the context dimension in the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, and is a derivative product of the Alberta Context Tool. Its development was undertaken in Bangladesh, Vietnam, Uganda, South Africa and Nicaragua in six phases: (1) defining dimensions and draft tool development, (2) content validity amongst in-country expert panels, (3) content validity amongst international experts, (4) response process validity, (5) translation and (6) evaluation of psychometric properties amongst 690 health workers in the five countries.

          Results

          The tool was validated for use amongst physicians, nurse/midwives and community health workers. The six phases of development resulted in a good fit between the theoretical dimensions of the COACH tool and its psychometric properties. The tool has 49 items measuring eight aspects of context: Resources, Community engagement, Commitment to work, Informal payment, Leadership, Work culture, Monitoring services for action and Sources of knowledge.

          Conclusions

          Aspects of organizational context that were identified as influencing the implementation of EBPs in high-income settings were also found to be relevant in LMICs. However, there were additional aspects of context of relevance in LMICs specifically Resources, Community engagement, Commitment to work and Informal payment. Use of the COACH tool will allow for systematic description of the local healthcare context prior implementing healthcare interventions to allow for tailoring implementation strategies or as part of the evaluation of implementing healthcare interventions and thus allow for deeper insights into the process of implementing EBPs in LMICs.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0305-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Psychometric Theory.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges

            Background The PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) has proved to be a useful practical and conceptual heuristic for many researchers and practitioners in framing their research or knowledge translation endeavours. However, as a conceptual framework it still remains untested and therefore its contribution to the overall development and testing of theory in the field of implementation science is largely unquantified. Discussion This being the case, the paper provides an integrated summary of our conceptual and theoretical thinking so far and introduces a typology (derived from social policy analysis) used to distinguish between the terms conceptual framework, theory and model – important definitional and conceptual issues in trying to refine theoretical and methodological approaches to knowledge translation. Secondly, the paper describes the next phase of our work, in particular concentrating on the conceptual thinking and mapping that has led to the generation of the hypothesis that the PARiHS framework is best utilised as a two-stage process: as a preliminary (diagnostic and evaluative) measure of the elements and sub-elements of evidence (E) and context (C), and then using the aggregated data from these measures to determine the most appropriate facilitation method. The exact nature of the intervention is thus determined by the specific actors in the specific context at a specific time and place. In the process of refining this next phase of our work, we have had to consider the wider issues around the use of theories to inform and shape our research activity; the ongoing challenges of developing robust and sensitive measures; facilitation as an intervention for getting research into practice; and finally to note how the current debates around evidence into practice are adopting wider notions that fit innovations more generally. Summary The paper concludes by suggesting that the future direction of the work on the PARiHS framework is to develop a two-stage diagnostic and evaluative approach, where the intervention is shaped and moulded by the information gathered about the specific situation and from participating stakeholders. In order to expedite the generation of new evidence and testing of emerging theories, we suggest the formation of an international research implementation science collaborative that can systematically collect and analyse experiences of using and testing the PARiHS framework and similar conceptual and theoretical approaches. We also recommend further refinement of the definitions around conceptual framework, theory, and model, suggesting a wider discussion that embraces multiple epistemological and ontological perspectives.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Health worker motivation in Africa: the role of non-financial incentives and human resource management tools

              Background There is a serious human resource crisis in the health sector in developing countries, particularly in Africa. One of the challenges is the low motivation of health workers. Experience and the evidence suggest that any comprehensive strategy to maximize health worker motivation in a developing country context has to involve a mix of financial and non-financial incentives. This study assesses the role of non-financial incentives for motivation in two cases, in Benin and Kenya. Methods The study design entailed semi-structured qualitative interviews with doctors and nurses from public, private and NGO facilities in rural areas. The selection of health professionals was the result of a layered sampling process. In Benin 62 interviews with health professionals were carried out; in Kenya 37 were obtained. Results from individual interviews were backed up with information from focus group discussions. For further contextual information, interviews with civil servants in the Ministry of Health and at the district level were carried out. The interview material was coded and quantitative data was analysed with SPSS software. Results and discussion The study shows that health workers overall are strongly guided by their professional conscience and similar aspects related to professional ethos. In fact, many health workers are demotivated and frustrated precisely because they are unable to satisfy their professional conscience and impeded in pursuing their vocation due to lack of means and supplies and due to inadequate or inappropriately applied human resources management (HRM) tools. The paper also indicates that even some HRM tools that are applied may adversely affect the motivation of health workers. Conclusion The findings confirm the starting hypothesis that non-financial incentives and HRM tools play an important role with respect to increasing motivation of health professionals. Adequate HRM tools can uphold and strengthen the professional ethos of doctors and nurses. This entails acknowledging their professionalism and addressing professional goals such as recognition, career development and further qualification. It must be the aim of human resources management/quality management (HRM/QM) to develop the work environment so that health workers are enabled to meet their personal and the organizational goals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anna.bergstrom@kbh.uu.se
                skeen@sun.ac.za
                dmd@hsph.edu.vn
                fundchica@gmail.com
                carole.estabrooks@ualberta.ca
                petter.gustavsson@ki.se
                phuonghoa55@yahoo.com
                carina.kallestal@kbh.uu.se
                mats.malqvist@kbh.uu.se
                nga.nguyen@kbh.uu.se
                lars-ake.persson@kbh.uu.se
                jpervin@icddrb.org
                stefan.peterson@kbh.uu.se
                arahman@icddrb.org
                katarina.selling@kbh.uu.se
                jasquires@ohri.ca
                markt@sun.ac.za
                pwaiswa2001@yahoo.com
                lars.wallin@du.se
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                15 August 2015
                15 August 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 120
                Affiliations
                [ ]International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
                [ ]Hanoi School of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
                [ ]Fundacion Coordinación de Hermanamientos e Iniciativas de Cooperación CHICA, León, Nicaragua
                [ ]Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
                [ ]Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Research Institute for Child Health, National Hospital of Paediatrics, Hanoi, Vietnam
                [ ]Centre for Reproductive Health, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [ ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
                [ ]Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
                [ ]School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
                [ ]School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                Article
                305
                10.1186/s13012-015-0305-2
                4537553
                26276443
                eb791da1-e611-42de-8ca7-a4037a75c4c5
                © Bergström et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 27 October 2014
                : 5 August 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article