For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
16
views
1
references
 Top references
cited by
6
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      663
      similar
       All similar
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Study on Tear Function Abnormality in Pterygium

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is any abnormality in the tear function in patients with pterygium. Eighty-four patients with pterygia (56 with unilateral and 28 with bilateral involvement) and 45 healthy controls were entered in the study. Schirmer’s test, breakup time test and mucus fern test were applied to both eyes of the subjects. This was a prospective, comparative and interventional study. Tear function test results between the eyes with pterygium and controls were compared. They were similar in the eyes with or without pterygium. There were no tear function abnormalities in pterygium.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative study of recurrent pterygium surgery: limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation versus mitomycin C with conjunctival flap.

          G Sobaci, T Tatar, F Mutlu … (1999)
          To compare the recurrence rate following treatment of recurrent pterygia using one of two techniques-limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation versus low-dose intraoperative mitomycin C (0.2 mg/ml) combined with conjunctival flap closure. Randomized clinical trial. Eighty-one patients with recurrent pterygia treated by limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation (n= 41) or mitomycin C combined with conjunctival flap (n= 40) participated. Limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation or low-dose intraoperative mitomycin C application with conjunctival flap technique was performed on recurrent pterygium cases. Recurrence of pterygium and postoperative complications. During mean follow-up periods of 16+/-1.9 and 15.5+/-1.5 months, six recurrences (14.6%) in the limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation group and five recurrences (12.5%) in the mitomycin C group were observed (P=0.77). The difference between the mean ages of recurrent (26.4+/-8.0 years) and nonrecurrent (35.8+/-11.9 years) cases for all patients was statistically significant (P=0.014). Technically, limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation seemed to be more difficult. The most frequent complication in limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation was graft edema, whereas that in the mitomycin C group was superficial keratitis. Both techniques showed similar recurrence rates in the treatment of recurrent pterygia. Although technically easier to perform, further follow-up is necessary to determine the long-term safety of low-dose intraoperative mitomycin C with conjunctival flap closure. The surgeon's familiarity with either procedure should determine the method of choice.
          Article 0 comments Cited 26 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            All references

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Journal ID (publisher-id): OPH
            Journal ID (nlm-ta): Ophthalmologica
            Journal ID (doi): 10.1159/issn.0030-3755
            Title: Ophthalmologica
            Publisher: S. Karger AG
            ISSN (Print): 0030-3755
            ISSN (Electronic): 1423-0267
            Publication date Subscription-year: 2001
            Publication date (Print): June 2001
            Publication date (Electronic): 20 April 2001
            Volume: 215
            Issue: 3
            Pages: 204-208
            Affiliations
            Departments of aOphthalmology and bPathology, Kırıkkale University Medical Faculty, Turkey
            Article
            Publisher ID: 50859 Other ID: Ophthalmologica 2001;215:204–208
            DOI: 10.1159/000050859
            PubMed ID: 11340392
            SO-VID: ecbdd966-595d-46b2-bea6-c02b3e5b4b16
            Copyright © © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
            License:

            Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

            History
            Page count
            Tables: 4, References: 26, Pages: 5
            Categories
            Subject: Original Paper · Travail original · Originalarbeit

            ScienceOpen disciplines: Vision sciences,Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pathology
            Keywords: Tear function test,Schirmer’s test,Breakup time test,Mucus fern test,Pterygium
            Data availability:
            ScienceOpen disciplines: Vision sciences, Ophthalmology & Optometry, Pathology
            Keywords: Tear function test, Schirmer’s test, Breakup time test, Mucus fern test, Pterygium

            Comments

            Comment on this article

            scite_

            Similar content663

            See all similar

            Cited by6

            See all cited by

            Most referenced authors8

            See all reference authors