0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patterns of Alcohol Consumption Among Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdowns in Germany

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , PhD 2 , 3 , 4 , , MSc 5 , , DiplPsych 6 , , MD 7 , , DiplInf 8 , , MA 9 , , MD 9 , , BSc 6 , , Dr rer nat 6 , , MSc 5 , , MSc 2 , , Dr rer nat 6 , , MD 5 , , MSc 6 , , MSc 5 , , MSc 9 , , Dr rer medic 6 , , MSc 10 , , MSc 6 , , MSc 6 , , MSc 5 , , Dipl Math 8 , , MSc 10 , , Dr rer nat 8 , , MSc 9 , , MSc 9 , , MSc 9 , , MD, PhD 6 , , MD 9 , , MD 5 , 11 , 12 , , MD 5 , , PhD 6 , , PhD 2 , 3 , , MD, PhD 6 , , MD, PhD 1 , , and the ReCoDe Consortium
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are COVID-19 lockdown measures associated with alcohol consumption (AC) and temporal patterns of AC?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 189 participants who met the criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD), high-frequency AC tracking comprising 14 694 smartphone ratings revealed no immediate negative association of lockdown measures with overall AC. Independent of the lockdown, intention to control AC was associated with less AC; however, a difference between AC on weekends vs weekdays decreased during lockdown measures and in individuals with severe AUD.

          Meaning

          Both holidays and weekly patterns were associated with drinking intention and lockdown measures, reflecting losing and regaining control over AC; these patterns may serve as targets for prevention and intervention of AUD.

          Abstract

          This cohort study of individuals with alcohol use disorder examines whether COVID-19 lockdown measures in Germany were associated with changes in alcohol consumption.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Alcohol consumption (AC) leads to death and disability worldwide. Ongoing discussions on potential negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on AC need to be informed by real-world evidence.

          Objective

          To examine whether lockdown measures are associated with AC and consumption-related temporal and psychological within-person mechanisms.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This quantitative, intensive, longitudinal cohort study recruited 1743 participants from 3 sites from February 20, 2020, to February 28, 2021. Data were provided before and within the second lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: before lockdown (October 2 to November 1, 2020); light lockdown (November 2 to December 15, 2020); and hard lockdown (December 16, 2020, to February 28, 2021).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Daily ratings of AC (main outcome) captured during 3 lockdown phases (main variable) and temporal (weekends and holidays) and psychological (social isolation and drinking intention) correlates.

          Results

          Of the 1743 screened participants, 189 (119 [63.0%] male; median [IQR] age, 37 [27.5-52.0] years) with at least 2 alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) yet without the need for medically supervised alcohol withdrawal were included. These individuals provided 14 694 smartphone ratings from October 2020 through February 2021. Multilevel modeling revealed significantly higher AC (grams of alcohol per day) on weekend days vs weekdays (β = 11.39; 95% CI, 10.00-12.77; P < .001). Alcohol consumption was above the overall average on Christmas (β = 26.82; 95% CI, 21.87-31.77; P < .001) and New Year’s Eve (β = 66.88; 95% CI, 59.22-74.54; P < .001). During the hard lockdown, perceived social isolation was significantly higher (β = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-0.15; P < .001), but AC was significantly lower (β = −5.45; 95% CI, −8.00 to −2.90; P = .001). Independent of lockdown, intention to drink less alcohol was associated with lower AC (β = −11.10; 95% CI, −13.63 to −8.58; P < .001). Notably, differences in AC between weekend and weekdays decreased both during the hard lockdown (β = −6.14; 95% CI, −9.96 to −2.31; P = .002) and in participants with severe AUD (β = −6.26; 95% CI, −10.18 to −2.34; P = .002).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This 5-month cohort study found no immediate negative associations of lockdown measures with overall AC. Rather, weekend-weekday and holiday AC patterns exceeded lockdown effects. Differences in AC between weekend days and weekdays evinced that weekend drinking cycles decreased as a function of AUD severity and lockdown measures, indicating a potential mechanism of losing and regaining control. This finding suggests that temporal patterns and drinking intention constitute promising targets for prevention and intervention, even in high-risk individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

          Summary Background Alcohol use is a leading risk factor for death and disability, but its overall association with health remains complex given the possible protective effects of moderate alcohol consumption on some conditions. With our comprehensive approach to health accounting within the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016, we generated improved estimates of alcohol use and alcohol-attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 195 locations from 1990 to 2016, for both sexes and for 5-year age groups between the ages of 15 years and 95 years and older. Methods Using 694 data sources of individual and population-level alcohol consumption, along with 592 prospective and retrospective studies on the risk of alcohol use, we produced estimates of the prevalence of current drinking, abstention, the distribution of alcohol consumption among current drinkers in standard drinks daily (defined as 10 g of pure ethyl alcohol), and alcohol-attributable deaths and DALYs. We made several methodological improvements compared with previous estimates: first, we adjusted alcohol sales estimates to take into account tourist and unrecorded consumption; second, we did a new meta-analysis of relative risks for 23 health outcomes associated with alcohol use; and third, we developed a new method to quantify the level of alcohol consumption that minimises the overall risk to individual health. Findings Globally, alcohol use was the seventh leading risk factor for both deaths and DALYs in 2016, accounting for 2·2% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 1·5–3·0) of age-standardised female deaths and 6·8% (5·8–8·0) of age-standardised male deaths. Among the population aged 15–49 years, alcohol use was the leading risk factor globally in 2016, with 3·8% (95% UI 3·2–4·3) of female deaths and 12·2% (10·8–13·6) of male deaths attributable to alcohol use. For the population aged 15–49 years, female attributable DALYs were 2·3% (95% UI 2·0–2·6) and male attributable DALYs were 8·9% (7·8–9·9). The three leading causes of attributable deaths in this age group were tuberculosis (1·4% [95% UI 1·0–1·7] of total deaths), road injuries (1·2% [0·7–1·9]), and self-harm (1·1% [0·6–1·5]). For populations aged 50 years and older, cancers accounted for a large proportion of total alcohol-attributable deaths in 2016, constituting 27·1% (95% UI 21·2–33·3) of total alcohol-attributable female deaths and 18·9% (15·3–22·6) of male deaths. The level of alcohol consumption that minimised harm across health outcomes was zero (95% UI 0·0–0·8) standard drinks per week. Interpretation Alcohol use is a leading risk factor for global disease burden and causes substantial health loss. We found that the risk of all-cause mortality, and of cancers specifically, rises with increasing levels of consumption, and the level of consumption that minimises health loss is zero. These results suggest that alcohol control policies might need to be revised worldwide, refocusing on efforts to lower overall population-level consumption. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Changes in Adult Alcohol Use and Consequences During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US

            This survey study examines individual-level changes in alcohol use in US adults and associated negative consequences, from before to during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments.

              Psychosocial and health behaviour treatments and therapies can be extended beyond traditional research or clinical settings by using mobile technology to deliver interventions to individuals as they go about their daily lives. These ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) are treatments that are provided to people during their everyday lives (i.e. in real time) and in natural settings (i.e. real world). The goal of the present review is to synthesize and critique mobile technology-based EMI aimed at improving health behaviours and psychological and physical symptoms. Twenty-seven interventions using palmtop computers or mobile phones to deliver ambulatory treatment for smoking cessation, weight loss, anxiety, diabetes management, eating disorders, alcohol use, and healthy eating and physical activity were identified. There is evidence that EMI can be successfully delivered, are accepted by patients, and are efficacious for treating a variety of health behaviours and physical and psychological symptoms. Limitations of the existing literature were identified and recommendations and considerations for research design, sample characteristics, measurement, statistical analyses, and clinical implementation are discussed. Mobile technology-based EMI can be effectively implemented as interventions for a variety of health behaviours and psychological and physical symptoms. Future research should integrate the assessment and intervention capabilities of mobile technology to create dynamically and individually tailored EMI that are ecologically sensitive.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                1 August 2022
                August 2022
                1 August 2022
                : 5
                : 8
                : e2224641
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
                [3 ]Mental mHealth Lab, Department of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
                [4 ]Department of eHealth and Sports Analytics, Faculty of Sports Science, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of FreieUniversität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [7 ]Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Epilepsy-Clinic Tabor, Bernau, Germany
                [8 ]Center for Information Services and High Performance Computing, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
                [9 ]Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
                [10 ]Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
                [11 ]Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
                [12 ]Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: June 2, 2022.
                Published: August 1, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24641
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Deeken F et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Michael A. Rapp, MD, PhD, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam, Germany ( michael.rapp@ 123456uni-potsdam.de ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Rapp had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Deeken and Reichert contributed equally to this work.
                Study concept and design: Deeken, Reichert, Rapp, Heinz, Smolka, Walter, Lenz, Deserno, Ebner-Priemer.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Deeken, Reichert, Rapp.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Deeken, Reichert, Rapp, Zech.
                Obtained funding: Rapp, Heinz, Ebner-Priemer, Smolka, Walter, Lenz, Deserno.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Rapp, Heinz, Ebner-Priemer, Smolka, Walter, Lenz, Deserno.
                Study supervision: Rapp, Heinz, Ebner-Priemer, Smolka, Walter, Lenz, Deserno.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ebner-Priemer reported receiving consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by project 402170461–TRR 265 from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) and was supported in part by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy–EXC-2049–390688087.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Group Information: The ReCoDe Consortium members appear in Supplement 2.
                Article
                zoi220689
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24641
                9344361
                35913741
                ecc65e4a-a90d-487a-b859-87c27a92c4fd
                Copyright 2022 Deeken F et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 31 March 2022
                : 2 June 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Featured
                Online Only
                Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article