1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of 3D printed pelvic fracture related urethra and surrounding tissue as preoperative planning model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Urethral stenosis caused by pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) is a complex urological disease, especially for the redo cased. However, to find the proximal end of the posterior urethra, and to avoid injury to the rectum and to forecast to remove the inferior pubic margin are two key points for a successful surgery. These steps can be challenging for even the most experienced urologists. This study is to describe a new technique for understanding the three-dimensional (3D) anatomy of the urethra, which will also aid in surgical planning and simplify urethroplasty.

          Materials and methods

          Three patients underwent routine urethroscopy, X ray urethrography and contrast CT urethrography. The 3D images were then reconstructed, and the data were transmitted to a 3D printer. 3D models were printed with polyacrylic acid to simulate the anatomical structure and relationship of urethral stenosis with pubic symphysis and rectum. Various diagnosis methods were compared with the condition in surgery. The patients and trainee questionnaires were performed.

          Results

          Three models of urethral CT were obtained. These models were presented to patients and trainee doctors along with routine urethroscopy, urethrography, and urethral CT. The scores of patients and trainee question forms demonstrated that the 3D printed urethral stenosis model of pelvic fracture has obvious advantages in urethral adjacency and ease of understanding. The 3D printed urethras were easy to show the pubic symphysis and simulate its excision and exposure of urethra. The model could show the precise distance from urethra to rectum to prevent the rectum injury in surgery.

          Conclusions

          3D printing technology can be applied to the preoperative evaluation of urethral stenosis caused by PFUI. It can be auxiliary to understand the anatomical structure of the posterior urethra, the direction of urethral displacement, protecting the rectum and the forecasting for pubectomy. It is especially helpful for the accurate preoperative planning of some complex urethral stenosis and redo cases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline.

          The purpose of this Guideline is to provide a clinical framework for the diagnosis and treatment of male urethral stricture.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Magnetic resonance urethrography to assess obliterative posterior urethral stricture: comparison to conventional retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography.

            We prospectively evaluated magnetic resonance urethrography for depicting obliterative posterior urethral stricture.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transperineal bulboprostatic anastomosis in patients with simple traumatic posterior urethral strictures: a retrospective study from a referral urethral center.

              To evaluate the results of ancillary procedures for posterior urethroplasty and compare them with the severity of urethral stricture. A total of 301 patients (average age: 36 years) with posterior urethral strictures due to pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects were included in the study. Delayed transperineal bulboprostatic anastomosis was performed 6-24 months (mean 10 months) after pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects. Simple perineal anastomosis: 103 (34.2%) patients (group 1); perineal anastomosis with separation of the corporeal bodies: 89 (29.6%) patients (group 2); perineal anastomosis with inferior pubectomy: 95 (31.6%) patients (group 3); perineal anastomosis with rerouting of the urethra around the corpora cavernosum: 14 (4.7%) patients (group 4). The clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. The primary outcome examined the total success rate of the procedures. The secondary outcome examined the success rate of the procedures according to the ancillary surgical steps. Of the 301 delayed transperineal bulboprostatic anastomosis procedures, 263 (87.4%) were successful and 38 (12.6%) were unsuccessful. Simple perineal anastomosis without ancillary procedures reflected an 89.3% success rate, perineal anastomosis with separation of the corporeal body had an 86.5% success rate, perineal anastomosis with inferior pubectomy had an 84.2% success rate, and perineal anastomosis with urethral rerouting had an 85.7% success rate. Corporal splitting, inferior pubectomy, and urethral rerouting are beneficial and useful ancillary procedures in transperineal posterior urethroplasty to achieve tension-free anastomosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                13661685257@126.com
                jamesqfu@126.com
                Journal
                BMC Urol
                BMC Urol
                BMC Urology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2490
                6 January 2023
                6 January 2023
                2023
                : 23
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.16821.3c, ISNI 0000 0004 0368 8293, The Department of Urology, Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, , Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, ; No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, China
                [2 ]GRID grid.412542.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1772 8196, School of Materials Science and Engineering, , Shanghai University of Engineering Science, ; Shanghai, China
                [3 ]Shanghai Xietu Community Healthcare Center, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, China
                Article
                1165
                10.1186/s12894-022-01165-7
                9824970
                36609237
                ed37a72c-3a32-4a4a-8429-51d0da6cb790
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 13 July 2022
                : 15 December 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Fund of China
                Award ID: 82170694, 81700590
                Funded by: the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Biomedical Engineering Cross Research Foundation
                Award ID: YG2022ZD020, YG2017QN15
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Urology
                urethral stenosis,3d printing,pelvic fracture urethral injury,urethral plasty
                Urology
                urethral stenosis, 3d printing, pelvic fracture urethral injury, urethral plasty

                Comments

                Comment on this article