While dip direction is a fundamental parameter of slab geometry, it is rarely estimated quantitatively. Here, we develop a new method, Dip Direction Searching (DDS), of receiver functions (RFs) that reduces the uncertainty of slab dip direction estimation from tens to several degrees. DDS can also resolve the thickness and depth of a dipping structure. We then apply DDS to the RFs in the Sumatran subduction zone. Travel time differences of the converted phases from the upper and lower (oceanic Moho) boundaries of the dipping low‐velocity layer (LVL) along the plate interface show a thickness of 10–14 km. The results also show increased dip direction of the slab Moho from 47 ± 5.3° in southern Sumatra to 70 ± 10.7° in northern Sumatra, indicating a complicated slab geometry and internal deformation along strike. Similar dip directions are obtained for the upper and lower LVL boundaries beneath Nias and Enggano forearc islands in the north and south, whereas we find a larger discrepancy of ∼14–23° beneath Siberut and Pagai in between. The thicker LVL with a non‐negligible difference in the dip directions of its upper and lower bounds in the center of Sumatra is interpreted as a partially serpentinized mantle layer above the oceanic crust, forming a distinct channel atop the subducting slab. Our results provide basic observational constraints on the structure and geometry of the oceanic slab and associated subduction processes. Both synthetics and data analyses also indicate DDS can be applied in other subduction zones and for other dipping interfaces.
Subducting plate boundary, between the oceanic and the continental plates, is key to understanding material and energy exchanges in the subduction factory and the associated geohazards. Seismic imaging reveals a dipping low‐velocity layer (LVL) at the subducting plate boundary globally associated with megathrust earthquakes and arc magmatism, but the nature of the LVL remains hotly debated because of lacking strong constraints on its geometry and properties and regional comparisons. To partly fill the knowledge gap, we propose a Dip Direction Searching (DDS) method to detect the LVL, estimate the dip directions of its upper and lower boundaries, and constrain its depths and thickness based on seismic P‐wave to S‐wave converted phases. DDS is then applied to the Sumatra subduction zone as a case study, and an LVL is successfully detected with a large thickness (up to 14 km) than a normal oceanic crust (∼7 km). The dip directions of the upper and lower boundaries of the LVL differ by up to 23°, suggesting a considerably irregular upper boundary. We interpret the LVL as the oceanic crust overlain by a low‐velocity hydrated mantle layer, indicating a smeared/diffuse plate boundary caused by upward fluid migration and its resultant mantle serpentinization.
A new receiver function method is developed to estimate dip direction, depth, and thickness of a dipping layer
Applying this method to the Sumatran subduction zone, we identify dipping low‐velocity layers along slab interface
The dipping layer with abnormal thickness and dip direction is interpreted as a hydrated and diffused plate boundary