There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The advantages and disadvantages of using the Internet in both qualitative and quantitative
researches in the field of health are readily available in the literature, but little
examination has been made of the factors to be considered in developing and running
Internet-mediated research. A bibliographic search of English language publications
indexed in eight computerized databases (EBSCO, EMBASE, MedLine, PsycInfo, CINAHL,
PubMed, Cochrane, and TRIP) was undertaken with no limit set for the data of publication.
The keywords Internet, research, quality, credibility, reliability, and validity were
used in all possible combinations, and mappings to headings made wherever possible.
The search revealed three key areas in setting up and undertaking Internet-mediated
research: addressing sampling biases, ensuring ethical practice, and exploring the
validity of data collected using an online interface. This paper contributes to the
ongoing development of quality standards in the conduct and write-up of Internet-mediated
research in the field of health.