0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Colorectal cancers are common tumors in the United States and appropriate imaging is essential to direct appropriate care. Staging and treatment differs between tumors arising in the colon versus the rectum. Local staging for colon cancer is less integral to directing therapy given radical resection is often standard. Surgical options for rectal carcinoma are more varied and rely on accurate assessment of the sphincter, circumferential resection margins, and peritoneal reflection. These important anatomic landmarks are best appreciated on high-resolution imaging with transrectal ultrasound or MRI. When metastatic disease is suspected, imaging modalities that provide a global view of the body, such as CT with contrast or PET/CT may be indicated. Rectal cancer often metastasizes to the liver and so MRI of the liver with and without contrast provides accurate staging for liver metastases. This article focuses on local and distant staging and reviews the appropriateness of different imaging for both variants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Am Coll Radiol
          Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
          Elsevier BV
          1558-349X
          1546-1440
          May 2017
          : 14
          : 5S
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Principal Author, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Saint Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: fowlerk@mir.wustl.edu.
          [2 ] Co-author, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
          [3 ] University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama; American Gastroenterological Association.
          [4 ] University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; American College of Surgeons.
          [5 ] Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
          [6 ] Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.
          [7 ] Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
          [8 ] Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
          [9 ] University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinic, Madison, Wisconsin.
          [10 ] University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
          [11 ] Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
          [12 ] Penn State Hershey Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
          [13 ] Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
          [14 ] Stritch School of Medicine Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.
          [15 ] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
          [16 ] Speciality Chair, Inland Imaging Associates and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
          [17 ] Panel Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.
          Article
          S1546-1440(17)30190-4
          10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.012
          28473079
          edf2281b-f26a-4741-ae6f-232fe0fa9dc9
          History

          AUC,Appropriate Use Criteria,Appropriateness Criteria,colorectal cancer staging,rectal cancer MRI,rectal cancer imaging,rectal cancer transrectal ultrasound

          Comments

          Comment on this article