Intraprostatic injection of botulinum toxin-A in patients with refractory chronic pelvic pain syndrome: The transurethral vs. transrectal approach

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the outcome of an intraprostatic injection of botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) in men with refractory chronic prostatitis-associated chronic pelvic-pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) and to compare the efficacy of the transurethral and transrectal routes.

Patients and methods

In an uncontrolled randomised clinical trial conducted in men with refractory CP/CPPS, the patients were classified into two groups according to the route of BTX-A injection; transurethral (group 1, 28 patients) and transrectal ultrasonography-guided (group 2, 35 patients). The chronic prostatitis symptom index (CPSI), maximum urinary flow rate ( Q _max) and white blood cell (WBC) count in expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) were measured before and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the injection. A significant clinical improvement (SCI, defined as a reduction of 4 points or a 25% decrease in total CPSI score) was correlated with patient age, prostate volume and symptom duration.

Results

In group 1, the pain and quality-of-life domain scores improved, but statistically significantly only at 6 months. The voiding score improved at all follow-up visits. In group 2 there was a significant improvement in all the CPSI domain scores at all follow-up visits, except for pain, which was insignificantly improved by 12 months. The SCI ratings in groups 1 and 2 were 36%, 79% and 57%, and 49%, 89% and 74% in group 2 at the three follow-up visits, respectively. The Q _max was significantly improved in both groups during the follow-up (except at 12 months in group 1). There was a significant reduction in the mean WBC count in the EPS in patients with inflammatory prostatitis. Both prostate volume and symptom duration were significantly associated with a lower SCI rating.

Conclusion

BTX-A is an available treatment option for patients with refractory CP/CPPS. It is more effective in patients with a small prostate and short symptom duration. The transrectal route provided better results than the transurethral route. More prospective longer term studies are needed.