7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Methodological features of clinical pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic studies of antibacterials and antifungals: a systematic review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pharmacokinetic (PK)–pharmacodynamic (PD) indices relate measures of drug exposure to antibacterial effect. Clinical PK–PD studies aim to correlate PK–PD indices with outcomes in patients. Optimization of dosing based on pre-clinical studies means that PK–PD relationships are difficult to establish; therefore studies need to be designed and reported carefully to validate pre-clinical findings.

          Objectives

          To describe the methodological features of clinical antibacterial and antifungal PK–PD studies that reported the relationship between PK–PD indices and clinical or microbiological responses.

          Methods

          Studies published between 1980 and 2015 were identified through systematic searches. Methodological features of eligible studies were extracted.

          Results

          We identified 85 publications containing 97 PK–PD analyses. Most studies were small, with fewer than 100 patients. Around a quarter were performed on patients with infections due to a single specific pathogen. In approximately one-third of studies, patients received concurrent antibiotics/antifungals and in some other studies patients received other treatments that may confound the PK–PD–outcome relationship. Most studies measured antimicrobial concentrations in blood/serum and only four measured free concentrations. Most performed some form of regression, time-to-event analysis or used the Hill/Emax equation to examine the association between PK–PD index and outcome. Target values of PK–PD indices that predict outcomes were investigated in 52% of studies. Target identification was most commonly done using recursive partitioning or logistic regression.

          Conclusions

          Given the variability in conduct and reporting, we suggest that an agreed set of standards for the conduct and reporting of studies should be developed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          High-dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity.

          Vancomycin hydrochloride treatment failure for infections caused by susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has prompted recent guidelines to recommend a higher vancomycin target trough of 15 to 20 microg/mL. A prospective cohort study of adult patients infected with MRSA was performed to determine the distribution of vancomycin MIC and treatment outcomes with vancomycin doses targeting an unbound trough of at least 4 times the MIC. The microbiology laboratory computer records were used to identify all patients from whom MRSA was isolated from August 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005. Primary outcome measures were clinical response, mortality, and nephrotoxicity. Patients were placed into subgroups based on target trough attainment and high vs low vancomycin MIC (>/=2 vs /=15 vs <15 microg/mL) for nephrotoxicity analyses. Of the 95 patients in the study, 51 (54%) were infected with high-MIC strains and had pneumonia (77%) and/or bacteremia. An initial response rate of 74% was achieved if the target trough was attained irrespective of MIC. However, despite achieving the target trough, the high-MIC group had lower end-of-treatment responses (24/39 [62%] vs 34/40 [85%]; P = .02) and higher infection-related mortality (11/51 [24%] vs 4/44 [10%]; P=.16) compared with the low-MIC group. High MIC (P = .03) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (P = .009) were independent predictors of poor response in multivariate analysis. Nephrotoxicity occurred only in the high-trough group (11/63 [12%]), significantly predicted by concomitant therapy with other nephrotoxic agents. High prevalence of clinical MRSA strains with elevated vancomycin MIC (2 microg/mL) requires aggressive empirical vancomycin dosing to achieve a trough greater than 15 microg/mL. Combination or alternative therapy should be considered for invasive infections caused by these strains.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical Response to Aminoglycoside Therapy: Importance of the Ratio of Peak Concentration to Minimal Inhibitory Concentration

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections.

              We conducted a prospective, open-label study to delineate a relationship between exposure and outcomes in 36 patients treated with cefepime. Twenty patients had documented Gram-negative infections. Timed blood and urine samples were obtained at steady state to determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Microbiological success was significantly correlated with the proportion of the dosing interval that cefepime concentrations exceeded 4.3 x MIC. Our results support in vitro data that suggest bactericidal activity of beta-lactams is optimized at concentrations approximately 4 x MIC. These results should be validated by large prospective clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0305-7453
                1460-2091
                June 2020
                June 01 2020
                February 21 2020
                June 2020
                June 01 2020
                February 21 2020
                : 75
                : 6
                : 1374-1389
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
                [2 ]Institute of Clinical Pharmacodynamics, 242 Broadway, Schenectady, New York 12305, USA
                [3 ]Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, UF Research and Academic Center at Lake Nowa, 6550 Sanger Road, Orlando, Florida 32827, USA
                [4 ]Centre for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 4BX, UK
                [5 ]Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Centre, s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research & Evaluation, Infection Sciences, Pathology Science Quarter, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
                Article
                10.1093/jac/dkaa005
                32083674
                ee6935e0-cc0c-4fe4-a470-3ef7600a834d
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article