29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictors of Relapse in a Bupropion Trial for Smoking Cessation in Recently-Abstinent Alcoholics: Preliminary Results Using an Aggregate Genetic Risk Score

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Rates of smoking in the US population have decreased overall, but rates in some groups, including alcoholic smokers, remain high. Many newly sober alcoholics are concerned about their smoking and some attempt to quit. However, quit rates in this population are low. Prior studies suggest risk for relapse in this population may be genetically influenced and that genetic factors may moderate response to treatment.

          Methods

          In this exploratory study, we had two specific aims: (1) to investigate associations between genetic risk and outcome; (2) to investigate whether genetic risk moderates the efficacy of a medication intervention. Data are from a subsample of 90 participants from a clinical trial of smoking cessation treatment for smokers with between 2 and 12 months of alcohol abstinence. Subjects were randomly assigned to bupropion or placebo. All subjects received counseling and nicotine patches. To examine the possibility that bupropion may have been efficacious in participants with a specific genetic profile (ie, a pharmacogenetic approach), an aggregate genetic risk score was created by combining risk genotypes previously identified in bupropion treatment studies.

          Results

          Although medication efficacy was not moderated by the aggregate genetic risk score, there was an interaction between nicotine dependence and genetic risk in predicting smoking abstinence rates at the end of treatment (10 weeks).

          Conclusions

          Results suggest an aggregate genetic risk score approach may have utility in treatment trials of alcoholics who smoke. Additionally, these findings suggest a strategy for understanding and interpreting conflicting results for single genetic markers examined as moderators of smoking cessation treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Factor analysis and AIC

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations.

            A workgroup formed by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco reviewed the literature on abstinence measures used in trials of smoking cessation interventions. We recommend that trials report multiple measures of abstinence. However, at a minimum we recommend that trial: (a) report prolonged abstinence (i.e., sustained abstinence after an initial period in which smoking is not counted as a failure) as the preferred measure, plus point prevalence as a secondary measure; (b) use 7 consecutive days of smoking or smoking on > or = 1 day of 2 consecutive weeks to define treatment failure; (c) include non-cigarette tobacco use, but not nicotine medications in definitions of failure; and (d) report results from survival analysis to describe outcomes more fully. Trials of smokers willing to set a quit date should tie all follow-ups to the quit date and report 6- and/or 12-month abstinence rates. For these trials, we recommend an initial 2-week grace period for prolonged abstinence definitions; however, the period may vary, depending on the presumed mechanism of the treatment. Trials of smokers who may not be currently trying to quit should tie follow-up to the initiation of the intervention and should report a prolonged abstinence measure of > or = 6-month duration and point prevalence rates at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. The grace period for these trials will depend on the time necessary for treatment dissemination, which will vary depending on the treatment, setting, and population. Trials that use short-term follow-ups ( or = 4 weeks. We again recommend a 2-week grace period; however, that period can vary.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions with individuals in substance abuse treatment or recovery.

              This meta-analysis examined outcomes of smoking cessation interventions evaluated in 19 randomized controlled trials with individuals in current addictions treatment or recovery. Smoking and substance use outcomes at posttreatment and long-term follow-up (> or = 6 months) were summarized with random effects models. Intervention effects for smoking cessation were significant at posttreatment and comparable for participants in addictions treatment and recovery; however, intervention effects for smoking cessation were nonsignificant at long-term follow-up. Smoking cessation interventions provided during addictions treatment were associated with a 25% increased likelihood of long-term abstinence from alcohol and illicit drugs. Short-term smoking cessation effects look promising, but innovative strategies are needed for long-term cessation. Contrary to previous concerns, smoking cessation interventions during addictions treatment appeared to enhance rather than compromise long-term sobriety. Copyright 2004 APA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Subst Abuse
                Subst Abuse
                Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment
                Libertas Academica
                1178-2218
                2012
                17 September 2012
                : 6
                : 107-114
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Genetics, Rhode Island Hospital and Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.
                [2 ]Division of Behavioral Genetics, Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University.
                [3 ]Department of Food Science, Pennsylvania State University.
                [4 ]Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.
                [5 ]University of Massachusetts Medical School.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author email: john_mcgeary@ 123456brown.edu
                Article
                sart-6-2012-107
                10.4137/SART.S8866
                3460669
                23032639
                ee98706e-8d41-4a30-bffc-ba85a50f6066
                © 2012 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd.

                This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Health & Social care
                bupropion,nicotine dependence,pharmacogenetics
                Health & Social care
                bupropion, nicotine dependence, pharmacogenetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article