1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Light or Deep Pressure: Medical Staff Members Differ Extensively in Their Tactile Stimulation During Preterm Apnea

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Even though tactile stimulation is common practice to terminate preterm apnea, the style and intensity of these interventions is not specified during theoretical or practical training and has never been clinically evaluated.

          Objective: The present study was designed to analyze the various modes of tactile stimulation used to terminate preterm apnea and measure the pressure intensity and frequency of these stimulations.

          Methods: A model with the size and weight of an actual preterm infant was equipped with sensor technology to measure stimulation pressure and frequency of tactile stimulation. Additionally a camera system was used to record hand positions and stimulation modes. Seventy medical staff members took part in the experiment.

          Results: We found extreme between subjects differences in stimulation pressure that could not be explained by professional experience but, to a degree, depended on apnea intensity. Pressures ranged from 11.11 to 226.87 mbar during low intensity apnea and from 9.89 to 428.15 mbar during high intensity apnea. The majority of participants used rhythmic stimulation movements with a mean frequency of ~1 Hz. Different modes (rubbing, squeezing, tickling, and tapping) and finger positions were used.

          Conclusion: Medical staff members intuitively adjust their tactile stimulation pressure depending on the premature infants' apnea intensity. However, mean pressure values varied greatly between subjects, with similar pressure ranges for low and high intensity apnea. The question remains which pressure intensities are necessary or sufficient for the task. It is reasonable to assume that some stimulation types may be more effective in rapidly terminating an apneic event.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Current options in the management of apnea of prematurity.

          J J Bhatia (2000)
          Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is a common problem that affects premature infants and, to a lesser degree, term infants. Apnea of prematurity appears to be due to immaturity of the infant's neurologic and respiratory systems. Apnea of prematurity is a diagnosis of exclusion that can be made only when other possible infectious, cardiologic, physiologic, and metabolic causes of apnea have been ruled out. The fundamental principles for managing apnea of prematurity include monitoring the infant closely while instituting supportive care measures such as tactile stimulation, continuous positive airway pressure, or mechanical ventilation. When necessary, pharmacologic therapy may be used to stimulate breathing. The first-line agents of choice for the management of AOP are the methylxanthines. And, for second-line therapy, a switch to a different class of agent, such as the respiratory stimulant doxapram, is an option. Of the methylxanthines, theophylline is the most extensively used. However, a review of the literature suggests that caffeine citrate may be the agent of choice for AOP. Comparative clinical studies have demonstrated that caffeine is at least as effective as theophylline, has a longer half-life, is associated with fewer adverse events, and, in addition, has a greater ease of administration. Caffeine stimulates the respiratory and central nervous systems more effectively and penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid more readily than theophylline. In addition, because of stable plasma levels, caffeine has a wide therapeutic margin and few side effects. In contrast, theophylline plasma levels may fluctuate widely, which necessitates frequent monitoring and has a higher incidence of adverse events than caffeine. Before the FDA approval of caffeine citrate (Cafcit) for administration either intravenously and/or orally, caffeine preparations were "homemade." A few studies suggest that use of pharmacotherapy to treat AOP is not generally associated with long-term sequelae, although more data are needed before this can be definitively concluded.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Real-World Routine Use of Caffeine Citrate in Preterm Infants: A European Postauthorization Safety Study.

            Caffeine citrate is the treatment of choice for apnea of prematurity (AOP). Regulatory agencies have requested real-world data on drug utilization and safety, a postauthorization safety study, of a pharmaceutical-grade caffeine citrate, Peyona, to confirm its benefit for preterm infants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Apnea of prematurity. Comparative therapeutic effects of cutaneous stimulation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

              It has been suggested that idiopathic apnea of prematurity is related to hypoxia from pulmonary instability or an immaturity of central respiratory control mechanisms. To explore these hypotheses, 18 preterm infants were studied to examine the therapeutic effects of prophylactic cutaneous stimulation (6) and continuous positive airway pressure(12). The frequency of apnea using each procedure was reduced by 35 and 69 percent, respectively. These findings constitute the basis for new therapeutic measures for treatment of idiopathic neonatal apnea.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                17 March 2020
                2020
                : 8
                : 102
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Haptic Research Lab, Paul Flechsig Institute for Brain Research, Leipzig University , Leipzig, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Leipzig , Leipzig, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Stuart Brian Hooper, Monash University, Australia

                Reviewed by: Daniele Trevisanuto, University Hospital of Padua, Italy; Kazumichi Fujioka, Kobe University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Stephanie Margarete Mueller s.mueller@ 123456medizin.uni-leipzig.de

                This article was submitted to Neonatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2020.00102
                7089873
                32257984
                ef15f87e-dbbc-4543-81a7-473b274669a3
                Copyright © 2020 Martin, Thome, Grunwald and Mueller.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 November 2019
                : 27 February 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 9, Pages: 6, Words: 3700
                Funding
                Funded by: European Social Fund 10.13039/501100004895
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Brief Research Report

                neonatology,very low birth weight,pressure sensor,stimulation frequency,apnea of prematurity,treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article