40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Psychische Störungen bei Vorschulkindern : Unterschiede zwischen den DC: 0 – 5 und ICD-10 Klassifikationssystemen

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Zusammenfassung. Um psychische Störungen bei jungen Kindern zu erfassen, wurde das Klassifikationssystem DC: 0 – 5 entwickelt. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, Diagnosen nach DC: 0 – 5 und ICD-10 zu vergleichen. Bei 176 konsekutiv vorgestellten Kindern (70,5 % Jungen) mit einem mittleren Alter von 3,96 Jahren wurden Diagnosen nach ICD-10 und DC: 0 – 5 vergeben. 78,4 % der Kinder hatten eine Diagnose nach ICD-10, 88,1 % der Kinder nach DC: 0 – 5. Die häufigste ICD-10 Diagnose war Störung des Sozialverhaltens mit oppositionellem Verhalten (ODD; 28,4 %), gefolgt von Schlafstörungen (21,0 %), ADHS (14,8 %) und Angststörungen (6,8 %). Die häufigsten DC: 0 – 5 Diagnosen waren ADHS (30,7 %) und die Dysregulierte Ärger- und Aggressionsstörung (31,3 %), gefolgt von Schlaf-‍, Angst-‍, Ess- und Traumafolgestörungen. Zusammengefasst ist die DC: 0 – 5 das spezifischste Klassifikationssystem zur Diagnose psychischer Störungen bei jungen Kindern. Es hat sich in Kombination mit der ICD-10 in der klinischen Praxis bewährt. Wünschenswert wäre die weitere Verwendung und Überprüfung der DC: 0 – 5 in klinischen Studien.

          Mental Disorders in Young Children: Differences Between the DC: 0 – 5 and ICD-10 Classification Systems

          Abstract. The DC: 0 – 5 TM: Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood: Zero to Three (DC: 0 – 5) classification system was developed to assess mental disorders in young children, using age-specific and developmentally appropriate criteria. It is used in addition to the ICD-10 and DSM-5 classification systems. As the DC: 0 – 5 and the ICD-10 have not been compared systematically yet, the aim was to analyze both systems in a group of preschool children. A group of consecutive children ( N = 176) who presented to a specialized tertiary outpatient department were examined. The sample included 70.5 % boys, with a mean age of 3.96 years. The diagnoses were given according to clinical criteria of ICD-10 and DC: 0 – 5 after an assessment including history, questionnaires, mental state exam, developmental tests, and physical exam. Of the children, 78.4 % had an ICD-10, and 88.1 % a DC: 0 – 5 diagnosis. The most common ICD-10 diagnoses were oppositional defiant disorder (ODD; 28.4 %), sleep disorders (21.0 %), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; 14.8 %), and anxiety disorders (6.8 %). Infants (0 – 1 years) were mainly affected by sleep, adjustment, and eating disorders. Neurodevelopmental disorders were the most common DC: 0 – 5 diagnoses (60.2 %), including ADHD, autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and their precursors, the overactivity disorder of toddlerhood, and early atypical ASD. ADHD (30.7 %) was almost as common as the disorder of dysregulated anger and aggression of early childhood (DDAA) with 31.3 %, followed by sleep, anxiety, eating, and trauma-associated disorders. Children with DDAA were significant older and had comorbid ODD and ADHD more often. Correlations between ICD-10 and DC: 0 – 5 diagnoses were highly significant. This is the first study comparing the DC: 0 – 5 and the ICD-10, which are both clinically useful and valid classification systems for children in the age group of 0 – 5 years. Neurodevelopmental disorders and their precursors could be diagnosed with the DC: 0 – 5, thus enabling early treatment. The most common externalizing disorder was DDAA, defined by an inadequate regulation of negative emotions. In summary, the DC: 0 – 5 is the best and most specific classification system for the diagnosis of mental disorders in young children in combination with the ICD-10 and the DSM-5. It can be applied in clinical practice and in research. In addition to the specific criteria for this age, the introduction of new constructs such as the DDAA and the precursors of ADHD and ASD are especially useful. The application of the DC: 0 – 5 in clinical practice and in research is recommended.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Psychiatric disorders in preschoolers: continuity from ages 3 to 6.

          Recent studies indicate that many preschoolers meet diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorders. However, data on the continuity of these diagnoses are limited, particularly from studies examining a broad range of disorders in community samples. Such studies are necessary to elucidate the validity and clinical significance of psychiatric diagnoses in young children. The authors examined the continuity of specific psychiatric disorders in a large community sample of preschoolers from the preschool period (age 3) to the beginning of the school-age period (age 6). Eligible families with a 3-year child were recruited from the community through commercial mailing lists. For 462 children, the child's primary caretaker was interviewed at baseline and again when the child was age 6, using the parent-report Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment, a comprehensive diagnostic interview. The authors examined the continuity of DSM-IV diagnoses from ages 3 to 6. Three-month rates of disorders were relatively stable from age 3 to age 6. Children who met criteria for any diagnosis at age 3 were nearly five times as likely as the others to meet criteria for a diagnosis at age 6. There was significant homotypic continuity from age 3 to age 6 for anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and oppositional defiant disorder, and heterotypic continuity between depression and anxiety, between anxiety and oppositional defiant disorder, and between ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder. These results indicate that preschool psychiatric disorders are moderately stable, with rates of disorders and patterns of homotypic and heterotypic continuity similar to those observed in samples of older children.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS OF INFANCY AND EARLY CHILDHOOD DC:0-5: SELECTIVE REVIEWS FROM A NEW NOSOLOGY FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD PSYCHOPATHOLOGY.

            The Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood: Revised Edition (DC:0-5; ZERO TO THREE) is scheduled to be published in 2016. The articles in this section are selective reviews that have been undertaken as part of the process of refining and updating the nosology. They provide the rationales for new disorders, for disorders that had not been included previously in the Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood: Revised Edition (DC:0-3R; ZERO TO THREE, 2005), and for changes in how certain types of disorders are conceptualized.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS OF INFANCY AND EARLY CHILDHOOD (DC:0-5): IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS AND CLINICAL REMARKS.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                kie
                Kindheit und Entwicklung
                Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen
                0942-5403
                2190-6246
                2020
                : 29
                : 4
                : 201-208
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg
                [ 2 ]Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrische Klinik, Universität Basel
                [ 3 ]Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Landau
                [ 4 ]Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken
                Author notes
                Dr. Justine Hussong, Dr. Cornelia Overs, Dr. Frank W. Paulus, Prof. Dr. Alexander von Gontard, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie,, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421 Homburg, alexander.von.gontard@ 123456uks.eu
                Dr. Margarete Bolten, Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrische Klinik, Universität Basel, Kornhausgasse 7, 4051 Basel, Schweiz
                Prof. Dr. Tina In-Albon, Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Ostbahnstraße 12, 76829 Landau
                PD Dr. Monika Equit, Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität des Saarlandes, 66123 Saarbrücken
                Article
                kie_29_4_201
                10.1026/0942-5403/a000318
                ef6ac7e5-8b3e-459d-b751-27eda54bfbcc
                Copyright @ 2020
                History
                Categories
                Übersicht

                Psychology,Family & Child studies,Development studies,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                dysregulierte Ärger- und Aggressionsstörung,Kleinkinder,mental disorders,DC: 0 – 5,toddlers,psychische Störungen,DSM-5,ICD-10,preschoolers,oppositional defiant disorder,Säuglinge,disorder of dysregulated anger and aggression of early childhood,Störung des Sozialverhaltens mit oppositionellem Verhalten,DC: 0 – 5,Vorschulkinder,infants

                Comments

                Comment on this article