10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Niche partitioning of two piscivorous fish species in a river in the western Brazilian Amazon Translated title: Particionamento de nicho de duas espécies de peixes piscívoros em um rio na Amazônia Ocidental Brasileira

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ABSTRACT We analyzed the seasonal variation in the diet, trophic niche breadth (Levins index), the partitioning of food resources (Pianka’s symmetric index) and trophic level (weighed average of trophic level of each prey determined in FishBase and SeaLifeBase platform) of Plagioscion squamosissimus (Heckel, 1840) and Hydrolycus scomberoides (Cuvier, 1819) in the Machado River, Rondônia, Brazil. Fish samplings were conducted bimonthly from June 2013 to May 2015 in five sites, using eight sets of gillnets. The occurrence frequency and volumetric frequency were used to quantify the food items. We analyzed the stomach contents of 283 individuals, 134 of H. scomberoides and 149 of P. squamosissimus. Fish were the most consumed food item by both piscivorous species. However, H. scomberoides mostly ingested pelagic fish (e.g. Characiformes fishes and Prochilodus nigricas Spix & Agassiz, 1829), while P. squamosissimus mostly consumed benthic fish [e.g. Pimelodus blochii Valenciennes, 1840 and Tenellus trimaculatus (Boulenger, 1898)]. Hydrolycus scomberoides presented the trophic level 3.55 for both periods analyzed, while P. squamosissimus 4.01 in the flood period and 3.82 in the drought period. Seasonal variations in the diet of H. scomberoides and P. squamosissimus were observed (PERMANOVA). Specifically, P. squamosissimus consumed mainly “Siluriformes” fishes and P. blochii in the drought period. The trophic niche breadth of P. squamosissimus was greater than that of H. scomberoides in the flood period. The species P. squamosissimus and H. scomberoides had low (0.35) food niche overlap in both seasons analysed. The data indicated that P. squamosissimus has a generalist feeding habit, while H. scomberoides is specialized in prey selection. The overlap of food niche between the species in both periods of the hydrological cycle was low, indicating that niche partitioning was probably the main mechanism of coexistence of these species, with little relationship with variations of the hydrological cycle.

          Translated abstract

          RESUMO Nós analisamos a variação sazonal na dieta, a amplitude do nicho trófico (Índice de Levins), a partição dos recursos alimentares (Índice simétrico de Pianka) e o nível trófico (média do nível trófico de cada presa determinada pela plataforma FishBase e SeaLifeBase) de Plagioscion squamosissimus (Heckel, 1840) e Hydrolycus scomberoides (Cuvier, 1819) no rio Machado, Rondônia, Brasil. As amostragens de peixes foram realizadas bimestralmente de junho de 2013 a maio de 2015 em cinco locais, utilizando oito conjuntos de redes de emalhar. A frequência de ocorrência e a frequência volumétrica foram utilizados para quantificar os itens alimentares. Analisamos o conteúdo estomacal de 283 indivíduos, 134 de H. scomberoides e 149 de P. squamosissimus. Peixes foram o item alimentar mais consumido pelas duas espécies piscívoras. No entanto, H. scomberoides ingeriu principalmente peixes pelágicos (ex. peixes Characiformes e Prochilodus nigricas Spix & Agassiz, 1829), enquanto P. squamosissimus consumiu principalmente peixes bentônicos [ex. Pimelodus blochii Valenciennes, 1840 e Tenellus trimaculatus (Boulenger, 1898)]. Hydrolycus scomberoides apresentou nível trófico de 3,55 para ambos os períodos analisados, enquanto para P. squamosissimus o nível trófico foi de 4,01 no período da cheia e 3,82 no período de seca. Variações sazonais na dieta de H. scomberoides e P. squamosissimus foram observadas (PERMANOVA). Especificamente, P. squamosissimus consumiu principalmente peixes “Siluriformes” e P. blochii no período de seca. A largura do nicho trófico de P. squamosissimus foi maior que a de H. scomberoides no período da cheia. Plagioscion squamosissimus e H. scomberoides apresentaram baixa (0,35) sobreposição de nicho alimentar nas duas estações analisadas. Os dados indicaram que P. squamosissimus tem hábito alimentar generalista, enquanto H. scomberoides é especializado na seleção de presas. A sobreposição de nicho alimentar entre as espécies em ambos os períodos do ciclo hidrológico foi baixa, indicando que a partição de nicho foi provavelmente o principal mecanismo de coexistência dessas espécies, com pouca relação com as variações do ciclo hidrológico.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Concluding Remarks

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations.

            Ecosystem processes are thought to depend on both the number and identity of the species present in an ecosystem, but mathematical theory predicting this has been lacking. Here we present three simple models of interspecific competitive interactions in communities containing various numbers of randomly chosen species. All three models predict that, on average, productivity increases asymptotically with the original biodiversity of a community. The two models that address plant nutrient competition also predict that ecosystem nutrient retention increases with biodiversity and that the effects of biodiversity on productivity and nutrient retention increase with interspecific differences in resource requirements. All three models show that both species identity and biodiversity simultaneously influence ecosystem functioning, but their relative importance varies greatly among the models. This theory reinforces recent experimental results and shows that effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning are predicted by well-known ecological processes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Primary production required to sustain global fisheries

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                isz
                Iheringia. Série Zoologia
                Iheringia, Sér. Zool.
                Museu de Ciências Naturais (Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil )
                0073-4721
                1678-4766
                2022
                : 112
                : e2022002
                Affiliations
                [3] Rolim de Moura Rondônia orgnameUniversidade Federal de Rondônia orgdiv1Programa de Pós-Gra duação em Ciências Ambientais Brazil
                [2] Ji-Paraná Rondônia orgnameUniversidade Federal de Rondônia orgdiv1Mestrado Profissional em Gestão e Regulação de Recursos Hídricos Brazil
                [1] Santo Antônio de Pádua Rio de Janeiro orgnameUniversidade Federal Fluminense orgdiv1Instituto do Noroeste Flu minense de Educação Superior Brazil
                Article
                S0073-47212022000100201 S0073-4721(22)11200000201
                10.1590/1678-4766e2022002
                ef7010ea-6689-4bf2-a4d9-bfd91f76226d

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 02 December 2021
                : 13 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 95, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Articles

                seasonal variation,Dieta,nicho trófico,rio Machado,variação sazonal,Diet,trophic niche,Machado River

                Comments

                Comment on this article