Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predialysis education in practice: a questionnaire survey of centres with established programmes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is growing evidence that renal replacement therapy option education (RRTOE) can result in enhanced quality of life, improved clinical outcomes, and reduced health care costs. However, there is still no detailed guidance on the optimal way to run such programmes. To help address this knowledge gap, an expert meeting was held in March 2013 to formulate a position statement on optimal ways to run RRTOE. Experts were selected from units that had extensive experience in RRTOE or were performing research in this field. Before the meeting, experts completed a pilot questionnaire on RRTOE in their own units. They also prepared feedback on how to modify this questionnaire for a large-scale study.

          Methods

          A pilot, web-based questionnaire was used to obtain information on: the renal unit and patients, the education team, RRTOE processes and content, how quality is assessed, and funding.

          Results

          Four nurses, 5 nephrologists and 1 clinical psychologist (9 renal units; 6 EU countries) participated. Nurses were almost always responsible for organising RRTOE. Nephrologists spent 7.5% (median) of their time on RRTOE. Education for the patient and family began several months before dialysis or according to disease progression. Key topics such as the ‘impact of the disease’ were covered by every unit, but only a few units described all dialysis modalities. Visits to the unit were almost always arranged. Materials came in a wide variety of forms and from a wide range of sources. Group education sessions were used in 3/9 centres. Expectations on the timing of patients’ decisions on modality and permanent access differed substantially between centres. Common quality assurance measures were: patient satisfaction, course attendance, updated materials. Only 1 unit had a dedicated budget.

          Conclusions

          There were substantial variations in how RRTOE is run between the units. A modified version of this questionnaire will be used to assess RRTOE at a European level.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-730) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2005 Annual Report: ESRD Clinical Performance Measures Project.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis.

            Nephrologists report that patients' choice should play an important role in the selection of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In the United States, kidney transplant rates remain low and <10% of patients utilize home dialysis therapies. This study examined the effect of pre-ESRD processes on the selection of RRT among incident ESRD patients. Using surveys, data were collected for all patients admitted to 229 dialysis units in ESRD Network 18 between April 1, 2002 and May 31, 2002. A total of 1365 patients began chronic dialysis and 1193 facility (87%) and 428 patient (31%) surveys were returned. Substantial proportions of patients were unaware of their kidney disease (36%) or were not seeing a nephrologist (36%) until <4 months before first dialysis. The presentation of treatment options was delayed (48% either after or < 1 month before the first dialysis). The majority of ESRD patients were not presented with chronic peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis, or renal transplantation as options (66%, 88%, and 74%, respectively). Using multivariate analyses, variables significantly associated with selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis as dialysis modality were the probability of chronic peritoneal dialysis being presented as a treatment option and the time spent on patient education. An incomplete presentation of treatment options is an important reason for under-utilization of home dialysis therapies and probably delays access to transplantation. Improvements in and reimbursement for pre-ESRD education could provide an equal and timely access for all medically suitable patients to various RRTs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of education on chronic kidney disease patients' plans to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis: a randomized trial.

              Compared with in-center hemodialysis, self-care dialysis (including home and self-care hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) is less resource intensive and associated with similar clinical outcomes. However, utilization of self-care dialysis has been very low. We performed a randomized controlled trial in predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (GFR <30 mL/min) to determine the impact of a patient-centered educational intervention on patients' intention to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis. Seventy patients with CKD who were receiving care in a multidisciplinary predialysis clinic were randomized to receive either (1) a two-phase patient-centered educational intervention (phase 1 included educational booklets and a 15-minute video on self-care dialysis; phase 2 included a 90-minute small group interactive educational session on self-care dialysis) in addition to their regular multidisciplinary care, or (2) ongoing standard care and education in the multidisciplinary predialysis clinic. The primary outcome was patients' intention to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis, assessed by questionnaire. Thirty-five patients were randomized to standard care; 34 completed the study. Thirty-five patients were randomized to the educational intervention; 30 completed phase 1 and 28 completed phase 2. By study end, significantly more patients in the intervention group (82.1%) intended to start dialysis with self-care dialysis compared with the standard care group (50%, P= 0.015). This difference persisted after controlling for the small baseline differences among patients in the two study groups (P= 0.004). A two-phase educational intervention can increase the proportion of patients who intend to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mprietov@gmail.com
                corinne.bagnis@psl.aphp.fr
                jessica.dean@srft.nhs.uk
                tony.goovaerts@uclouvain.be
                stefan.melander@lio.se
                andrew.mooney2@nhs.net
                eva-lena.m.nilsson@skane.se
                peter_rutherford@baxter.com
                carmentruji@hotmail.com
                roberto.zambon@ulssvicenza.it
                carlo.crepaldi@ulssvicenza.it
                Journal
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Research Notes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1756-0500
                17 October 2014
                17 October 2014
                2014
                : 7
                : 1
                : 730
                Affiliations
                [ ]Unidad de Nefrología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain
                [ ]Service de Néphrology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière et Chaire de Recherche en Education Thérapeutique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
                [ ]Department of Clinical Health Psychology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, M6 8HD UK
                [ ]Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Service de Néphrologie, Brussels, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
                [ ]Renal Unit, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
                [ ]Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Skånes University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
                [ ]Baxter-Gambro Renal, Zurich, Switzerland
                [ ]Unidad clínica de Gestión de Nefrología, Hospital Regional Carlos Haya, Malaga, Spain
                [ ]Unità Operativa di Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto, Ospedale San Bortolo, ULSS106 Vicenza, Italy
                Article
                3255
                10.1186/1756-0500-7-730
                4210595
                25326141
                efc3fbfa-1d47-4dc6-8d92-d5b992b27b93
                © Prieto-Velasco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 16 June 2014
                : 9 October 2014
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Medicine
                predialysis,renal replacement therapy,education,chronic kidney disease,questionnaire
                Medicine
                predialysis, renal replacement therapy, education, chronic kidney disease, questionnaire

                Comments

                Comment on this article