Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factores de riesgo asociados a la proliferación del Aedes aegipty en el Consejo Popular "Los Maceos Translated title: Risk factors associated with the proliferation of Aedes aegipty in "Los Maceos" People´s Council

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Se efectuó un estudio analítico de casos y controles, con vistas a identificar los factores de riesgo para la proliferación del Aedes aegypti en el área de salud del Policlínico Docente "Carlos Juan Finlay", perteneciente al Consejo Popular "Los Maceos" de Santiago de Cuba, durante el 2010, para lo cual se utilizó el método de apareamiento, 2 controles (viviendas negativas) por cada caso (viviendas positivas). Se empleó la razón de producto cruzado, así como el riesgo atribuible a expuestos y a expuestos poblacional, con una confiabilidad de 95 %; además se aplicó el enfoque de riesgo. Existió una marcada asociación causal con la existencia de depósitos artificiales, la desprotección de tanques y elevado número de depósitos por viviendas. Entre los factores de riesgo figuraron: existencia de tanques desprotegidos y depósitos artificiales, índices de mosquitos superiores a los permisibles, aparición de casos febriles, población de manzanas reiterativas y realización del autofocal familiar

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Estrategia de educación popular para promover la participación comunitaria en la prevención del dengue en Cuba

          OBJETIVOS: Documentar el proceso y analizar los resultados de la aplicación de una estrategia dirigida a aumentar la participación comunitaria en la lucha contra el mosquito vector del dengue. MÉTODOS: Entre mayo de 2002 y mayo de 2004 se aplicó una intervención para transformar la acción social contra el dengue en tres circunscripciones del municipio Playa, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba. Se conformó un grupo de aprendizaje y grupos de trabajo comunitario (GTC) en las localidades. Se siguió un modelo de educación popular que conjugaba la puesta en práctica de las acciones previstas con sesiones de reflexión y aprendizaje a partir de los resultados y la reformulación del trabajo para las etapas subsiguientes. Se desarrollaron diagnósticos comunitarios, acciones preventivas, de comunicación, vigilancia y evaluación. Los cambios en la participación se identificaron mediante la técnica de análisis de contenido de documentos y entrevistas a informantes clave. RESULTADOS: El trabajo comunitario avanzó de acuerdo con las capacidades y los intereses de cada comunidad con enfoques de trabajo diferentes: de comunidad saludable, de riesgo ambiental y de riesgo entomológico. Se constataron cambios positivos en el concepto de participación según las cinco dimensiones evaluadas: liderazgo, identificación de necesidades, organización, gestión y movilización de recursos. Al final de dos años de intervención, el índice de depósitos con larvas o pupas de Aedes aegypti por 100 viviendas inspeccionadas se redujo en 79% y no se detectaron casos de dengue en ninguna de las circunscripciones. CONCLUSIONES: La estrategia empleada permitió reducir el nivel de infestación con el mosquito vector mediante el aumento de la participación de la comunidad en la toma de decisiones, el fortalecimiento de las competencias de los equipos médicos y de los GTC para liderar procesos participativos en sus comunidades y la elevación de la confianza de los miembros de la comunidad en sus posibilidades de llevar a cabo transformaciones con recursos propios y apoyo intersectorial.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Persistent Emergence of Dengue

            The disease dengue fever (DF; also known as breakbone fever, dandy fever, and by other names) can be caused by any of 4 viruses within the virus family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus, i.e., dengue virus types 1–4 (DENV-1–4). Dengue fever is a short-duration, nonfatal illness characterized by sudden onset of headache, retroorbital pain, high fever, joint pain, and rash. Whereas uncomplicated DF usually is the case, the picture can be much darker than that. Through a mechanism known as immune enhancement, sequential infections with certain dengue viruses set the stage for a far more serious complication, dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome, so that having uncomplicated DF can presage having DHF (1). DHF is characterized by high fever, vascular permeability, bleeding, enlargement of the liver, and circulatory failure (dengue shock syndrome). In mild or moderate cases, signs and symptoms subside after the fever subsides, but in severe cases the patient's condition suddenly deteriorates, body temperature decreases, and the circulatory system begins to fail. The patient then may quickly go into shock and die within a day, or quickly recover, if volume therapy is instituted ( 2 ). Dengue viruses are transmitted from person to person or from monkey to monkey through infected female mosquitoes of the genus Aedes. The mosquito acquires the virus by taking a blood meal from an infected human, the principal amplifying host for these viruses, or from an infected monkey. Humans circulate these viruses in their blood (viremia) for 7 to 10 days after infection, allowing ample time for mosquitoes, often many mosquitoes, to feed and become infected. After an intrinsic incubation period of 1 week to 10 days, the mosquito is capable of transmitting the virus to a new host while blood feeding. During epidemics of dengue, attack rates may be 80%–90% in susceptible persons. Although, it is not usually recognized, more than half the people who are infected with a dengue virus may be asymptomatic, which would indicate a substantial underreporting of infections. These comprise a substantial number of people who may have been primed for more serious illness at a later date and are unaware of their situation. The global prevalence of dengue has increased substantially recently. Dengue is endemic in ≈100 countries in Southeast Asia, Africa, the Western Pacific, the Americas, Africa, and the eastern Mediterranean area (available from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/ ), with imported cases essentially everywhere tourists, business people, and military personnel travel, whether dengue is recognized there or not. More than 2 billion of the approximately 6.5 billion inhabitants of this planet are at risk of acquiring dengue, and the World Health Organization has estimated that "there may be 50 million cases of dengue infection worldwide every year" (available from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/ ). However, this is a misstatement. Either there are 50 million dengue infections (some with illness, some not) or there are 50 million people sick with dengue each year. Infections are not the same as illnesses. The mild form of dengue is a serious annoyance and often is painful for those with it. However, DHF is the major international public health concern. Before 1970, a total of 9 countries had reported DHF epidemics; by 1995, >4 times that number reported such outbreaks. Most of these countries are in Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific, but with the worldwide spread of all dengue types, this disease threatens residents in tropical and subtropical regions, predominantly in urban and semiurban areas. In 2001, ≈600,000 cases of dengue were reported in the Americas, of which 15,000 were cases of DHF, more than twice the number of DHF cases in the Americas in 1995 (available from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/). In 2001 alone, Brazil reported nearly 400,000 cases, including 670 cases of DHF. Not only is the geographic distribution of dengue spreading, but the seriousness of its complications is being recognized (available from http://www.cdc.gov/search.do?action=search&queryText=dengue ). An estimated 500,000 persons with DHF require hospitalization each year, a substantial proportion of whom are children. Tragically, DHF is a leading cause of hospitalization and death of children in several Asian countries. Case-fatality rates can exceed 20%, are usually 2.5%, but can be reduced to <1% with rapid recognition and proper treatment. In countries that are prepared for dengue and its complications, diagnostic services are available. We are able to sequence these viruses and determine their origins and evolutionary determinants. We can, to some degree, control the vector mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus). Our knowledge of the pathophysiology of DHF is quite sophisticated ( 2 , 3 ). A vast literature is available about these viruses and the diseases they cause. Why, then, does dengue continue to spread? If we cannot eradicate dengue (and its vector Ae. aegypti) from populations on islands, from where can we eradicate it? Politics or misdirected funding, as always, has something to do with this, but the situation is much more complicated than that. Unless transovarial transmission (passage of virus from female to offspring through the egg) is much more important than it appears to be, other mechanisms are at play. Univalent vaccines for these viruses have been prepared but, for the most part, health authorities are (justifiably) unwilling to use such vaccines because they have the potential to stimulate the production of antibodies, which would prime vaccinees for DHF by immune enhancement. Fortunately, novel approaches (development of incompetent mosquitoes), development of modern tetravalent vaccines, and development of chimeric vaccine viruses ( 4 ), using classic as well as molecular approaches will soon be available and hold out promise of tools we need to eliminate or eradicate this scourge. This issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases includes some very interesting reports on dengue and its clinical complications, dengue diagnosis, and dengue epidemiology. These add considerably to the scientific record. Figure Dr. Calisher is professor of microbiology in the Arthropod-borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University. His interests include arboviruses and the diseases they cause, the biology of arthropod vectors of viruses, rodent-borne viruses and the diseases they cause, and the epidemiology of viruses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Dengue y fiebre hemorrágica del dengue: un problema de salud mundial

              Desde épocas tan remotas como 1635 y 1699, el dengue ha sido considerado la enfermedad viral transmitida por mosquitos de mayor importancia médica. Dada la importancia de esta entidad al nivel mundial y particularmente para la región de las Américas, se hizo necesaria la búsqueda de una solución inmediata para abortar el desarrollo de la forma grave de la enfermedad. En este estudio se presentó una actualización del tema en aspectos tan importantes como: el espectro clínico de la enfermedad, las características del agente etiológico y los mecanismos inmunopatogénicos que tienen lugar en su interacción con el hospedero.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                san
                MEDISAN
                MEDISAN
                Centro Provincial de Ciencias Médicas, Santiago de Cuba (Santiago de Cuba )
                1029-3019
                April 2014
                : 18
                : 4
                : 528-536
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Dirección Municipal de Salud Cuba
                [2 ] Unidad Municipal de Higiene y Epidemiología Cuba
                Article
                S1029-30192014000400010
                f0358a0a-1c42-47cb-82e3-017bf844af23

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Cuba

                Self URI (journal page): http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1029-3019&lng=en
                Categories
                MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

                Internal medicine
                risk factor,Aedes aegypti proliferation,primary health care,factor de riesgo,proliferación del Aedes aegypti,atención primaria de salud

                Comments

                Comment on this article