19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Optimal Pupil Diameter for Scheimpflug Slit Image Photography of the Lens in Man

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Densitometric analysis of Scheimpflug photography of the lens has been examined as a function of pupil diameter in normal volunteers. On the basis of both the length of the lens waveform and the integral area under the curve of the lens waveform, there is a critical pupil diameter above which the waveform is unchanged. Below this critical diameter the waveform becomes distorted by shortening and a change in shape. The critical pupil diameter is between 6 and 6.5 mm. This result is of importance either in longitudinal studies, where the pupil diameter may not be reproducible, or in studies where other drugs are used which may prevent full pupil dilatation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          ORE
          Ophthalmic Res
          10.1159/issn.0030-3747
          Ophthalmic Research
          S. Karger AG
          0030-3747
          1423-0259
          1992
          1992
          10 December 2009
          : 24
          : 1
          : 15-19
          Affiliations
          Department of aOphthalmology and bPhysiology and Endocrinology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga., USA
          Article
          267139 Ophthalmic Res 1992;24:15–19
          10.1159/000267139
          1608587
          f1589a2c-d659-4e20-b7da-5b70fc2de800
          © 1992 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          : 15 January 1991
          : 27 January 1991
          Page count
          Pages: 5
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Vision sciences,Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pathology
          Densitometry,Scheimpflug photography,Pupil diameter,Lens waveform,Mydriasis effects

          Comments

          Comment on this article