15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Socioeconomic position, treatment, and survival of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Denmark – a nationwide study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Not all patients have benefited equally from the advances in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survival. This study investigates several individual-level markers of socioeconomic position (SEP) in relation to NHL survival, and explores whether any social differences could be attributed to comorbidity, disease and prognostic factors, or the treatment given.

          Methods:

          This registry-based cohort study links clinical data on prognostic factors and treatment from the national Danish lymphoma database to individual socioeconomic information in Statistics Denmark including 6234 patients diagnosed with NHL in 2000–2008.

          Results:

          All-cause mortality was 40% higher in NHL patients with short vs higher education diagnosed in the period 2000–2004 (hazard ratio (HR)=1.40 (1.27–1.54)), and 63% higher in the period 2005–2008 (HR=1.63 (1.40–1.90)). Further, mortality was increased in unemployed and disability pensioners, those with low income, and singles. Clinical prognostic factors attenuated, but did not eliminate the association between education and mortality. Radiotherapy was less frequently given to those with a short education (odds ratio (OR)= 0.84 (0.77–0.92)), low income (OR=0.80 (0.70–0.91)), and less frequent to singles (OR=0.79 (0.64–0.96)). Patients living alone were less likely to receive all treatment modalities.

          Conclusion:

          Patients with low SEP have an elevated mortality rate after a NHL diagnosis, and more advanced disease at the time of diagnosis explained a part of this disparity. Thus, socioeconomic disparities in NHL survival might be reduced by improving early detection among patients of low SEP.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice.

          S. Geyer (2006)
          Education, income, and occupational class are often used interchangeably in studies showing social inequalities in health. This procedure implies that all three characteristics measure the same underlying phenomena. This paper questions this practice. The study looked for any independent effects of education, income, and occupational class on four health outcomes: diabetes prevalence, myocardial infarction incidence and mortality, and finally all cause mortality in populations from Sweden and Germany. Sweden: follow up of myocardial infarction mortality and all cause mortality in the entire population, based on census linkage to the Cause of Death Registry. Germany: follow up of myocardial infarction morbidity and all cause mortality in statutory health insurance data, plus analysis of prevalence data on diabetes. Multiple regression analyses were performed to calculate the effects of education, income, and occupational class before and after mutual adjustments. Sweden (all residents aged 25-64) and Germany (Mettman district, Nordrhein-Westfalen, all insured persons aged 25-64). Correlations between education, income, and occupational class were low to moderate. Which of these yielded the strongest effects on health depended on type of health outcome in question. For diabetes, education was the strongest predictor and for all cause mortality it was income. Myocardial infarction morbidity and mortality showed a more mixed picture. In mutually adjusted analyses each social dimension had an independent effect on each health outcome in both countries. Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably as indicators of a hypothetical latent social dimension. Although correlated, they measure different phenomena and tap into different causal mechanisms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study.

            Understanding the ways in which socioeconomic status (SES) affects mortality is important for defining strategies to eliminate the unequal burden of cancer by race and ethnicity in the United States. Disease stage, treatment, and 5-year mortality rates were ascertained by reviewing medical records, and SES was determined by analyzing income and education at the census tract level for 4844 women with breast cancer, 4332 men with prostate cancer, and 4422 men and women with colorectal cancer who were diagnosed in 7 U.S. states in 1997. Low SES was associated with more advanced disease stage and with less aggressive treatment for all 3 cancers. The hazard ratio (HR) for 5-year all-cause mortality associated with low SES was elevated after a diagnosis of breast cancer when the analysis was adjusted for age (HR, 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.87). Adjustment for mediating factors of race/ethnicity, comorbid conditions, cancer stage, and treatment reduced the association. The age-adjusted mortality risk associated with low SES was elevated after a diagnosis of prostate cancer (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57), and multivariate adjustments for mediating factors also reduced that association. There was less association between SES and mortality after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. For all 3 cancer sites, low SES was a much stronger predictor of mortality among individuals aged <65 years and among individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups. The current results indicated that low SES is a risk factor for all-cause mortality after a diagnosis of cancer, largely because of a later stage at diagnosis and less aggressive treatment. These findings support the need to focus on SES as an underlying factor in cancer disparities by race and ethnicity. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The influence of marital status on the stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer.

              Research indicates an association between marital status and health but this link has not been thoroughly explored. Our goal was to examine the association of marital status on the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer and the potential role socioeconomic status, education level, and comorbidities may play in explaining these associations. Retrospective cohort study using linked Medicare and National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. The sample consisted of 32,268 women aged 65 years and older who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 1991 to 1995. Information available through 1998 allowed for 3 years of follow-up. Results showed that unmarried women were more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer stage II-IV versus stage I and in situ (OR 1.17; CI95 1.12, 1.23). Unmarried women diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer were less likely to receive definitive therapy (OR 1.24; CI95 1.17, 1.31). Even after controlling for cancer stage and size at diagnosis and treatment received, unmarried women were at an increased risk of death from breast cancer (HR 1.25; CI95 1.14, 1.37). Socioeconomic variables and comorbidity had little impact on the relationship between marital status and survival. Older married women were at decreased risk for mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Many of the health benefits enjoyed by married women are likely derived from increased social support and social networks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                28 February 2012
                07 February 2012
                : 106
                : 5
                : 988-995
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup University Hospital , DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark
                [2 ]Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society , Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
                [3 ]Department of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital , DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
                Author notes
                Article
                bjc20123
                10.1038/bjc.2012.3
                3305955
                22315055
                f178873f-d8e1-49d2-b8a5-1195c59dd6c2
                Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK
                History
                : 01 September 2011
                : 21 December 2011
                : 27 December 2011
                Categories
                Epidemiology

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                non-hodgkin lymphoma,socioeconomic position,survival,radiotherapy,chemotherapy,immunotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article