20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cost analysis of rapid diagnostics for drug-resistant tuberculosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Growth-based drug susceptibility testing (DST) is the reference standard for diagnosing drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), but standard time to result (TTR) is typically ≥ 3 weeks. Rapid tests can reduce that TTR to days or hours, but accuracy may be lowered.

          In addition to the TTR and test accuracy, the cost of a diagnostic test may affect whether it is adopted in clinical settings. We examine the cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnostics for extremely drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) in three different high-prevalence settings.

          Methods

          1128 patients with confirmed TB were enrolled at clinics in Mumbai, India; Chisinau, Moldova; and Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Patient sputum samples underwent DST for first and second line TB drugs using 2 growth-based (MGIT, MODS) and 2 molecular (Pyrosequencing [PSQ], line-probe assays [LPA]) assays. TTR was the primary measure of effectiveness. Sensitivity and specificity were also evaluated. The cost to perform each test at each site was recorded and included test-specific materials, personnel, and equipment costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated in terms of $/day saved. Sensitivity analyses examine the impact of batch size, equipment, and personnel costs.

          Results

          Our prior results indicated that the LPA and PSQ returned results in a little over 1 day. Mean cost per sample without equipment or overhead was $23, $28, $33, and $41 for the MODS, MGIT, PSQ, and LPA, respectively. For diagnosing XDR-TB, MODS was the most accurate, followed by PSQ, and LPA. MODS was quicker and less costly than MGIT. PSQ and LPA were considerably faster but cost more than MODS. Batch size and personnel costs were the main drivers of cost variation.

          Conclusions

          Multiple factors must be weighed when selecting a test for diagnosis of XDR-TB. Rapid tests can greatly improve the time required to diagnose drug-resistant TB, potentially improving treatment success, and preventing the spread of XDR-TB. Faster time to result must be weighed against the potential for reduced accuracy, and increased costs.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02170441.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3013-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            What is the Cost of Diagnosis and Management of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa?

            Background Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is undermining TB control in South Africa. However, there are hardly any data about the cost of treating DR-TB in high burden settings despite such information being quintessential for the rational planning and allocation of resources by policy-makers, and to inform future cost-effectiveness analyses. Methodology We analysed the comparative 2011 United States dollar ($) cost of diagnosis and treatment of drug sensitive TB (DS-TB), MDR-TB and XDR-TB, based on National South African TB guidelines, from the perspective of the National TB Program using published clinical outcome data. Principal Findings Assuming adherence to national DR-TB management guidelines, the per patient cost of XDR-TB was $26,392, four times greater than MDR-TB ($6772), and 103 times greater than drug-sensitive TB ($257). Despite DR-TB comprising only 2.2% of the case burden, it consumed ∼32% of the total estimated 2011 national TB budget of US $218 million. 45% and 25% of the DR-TB costs were attributed to anti-TB drugs and hospitalization, respectively. XDR-TB consumed 28% of the total DR-TB diagnosis and treatment costs. Laboratory testing and anti-TB drugs comprised the majority (71%) of MDR-TB costs while hospitalization and anti-TB drug costs comprised the majority (92%) of XDR-TB costs. A decentralized XDR-TB treatment programme could potentially reduce costs by $6930 (26%) per case and reduce the total amount spent on DR-TB by ∼7%. Conclusion/Significance Although DR-TB forms a very small proportion of the total case burden it consumes a disproportionate and substantial amount of South Africa’s total annual TB budget. These data inform rational resource allocation and selection of management strategies for DR-TB in high burden settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid impact of effective treatment on transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

              Effective treatment for drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB) rapidly renders patients non-infectious, long before conversion of sputum acid-fast smear or culture to negative. Multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients on treatment are currently assumed to remain infectious for months. While the resources required for prolonged hospitalization are a barrier to the scale-up of MDR-TB treatment, the safety of community treatment is clear.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (858) 642-6347 , egroessl@ucsd.edu
                tganiats@ucsd.edu
                nhillery@ucsd.edu
                mandretrollip@gmail.com
                r2jackson@ucsd.edu
                dgcatanzaro@gmail.com
                trodwell@ucsd.edu
                rgarfein@ucsd.edu
                dr_crodrigues@hindujahospital.com
                valeriu.crudu@pas.md
                tv@sun.ac.za
                acatanzaro@ucsd.edu
                Journal
                BMC Infect Dis
                BMC Infect. Dis
                BMC Infectious Diseases
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2334
                2 March 2018
                2 March 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 102
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2107 4242, GRID grid.266100.3, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, , University of California San Diego, ; 9500 Gilman Dr, #0994, San Diego, CA USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0419 2708, GRID grid.410371.0, VA San Diego Healthcare System, ; San Diego, CA USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2214 904X, GRID grid.11956.3a, Department of Biomedical Sciences, , Stellenbosch University, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2107 4242, GRID grid.266100.3, Department of Medicine, , University of California, ; San Diego, CA USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9068 3546, GRID grid.194632.b, University of Arkansas, ; Little Rock, USA
                [6 ]Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai, India
                [7 ]Microbiology and Morphology Laboratory, Institute of Phthisiopneumology, Chisinau, Moldova
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-1965
                Article
                3013
                10.1186/s12879-018-3013-0
                5833048
                29499645
                f1b634b3-a615-4c5f-a4ba-e7f6f2255909
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 1 May 2017
                : 30 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: NIH
                Award ID: U01-AI082229
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                drug-resistant tuberculosis,diagnosis,cost-effectiveness,time to result

                Comments

                Comment on this article