2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Which future for aspirin in acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? An overview on aspirin-free strategies

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antithrombotic Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

          New England Journal of Medicine, 380(16), 1509-1524
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation.

            Despite current treatments, patients who have acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation have high rates of major vascular events. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the antiplatelet agent clopidogrel when given with aspirin in such patients. We randomly assigned 12,562 patients who had presented within 24 hours after the onset of symptoms to receive clopidogrel (300 mg immediately, followed by 75 mg once daily) (6259 patients) or placebo (6303 patients) in addition to aspirin for 3 to 12 months. The first primary outcome--a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke--occurred in 9.3 percent of the patients in the clopidogrel group and 11.4 percent of the patients in the placebo group (relative risk with clopidogrel as compared with placebo, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.90; P<0.001). The second primary outcome--the first primary outcome or refractory ischemia--occurred in 16.5 percent of the patients in the clopidogrel group and 18.8 percent of the patients in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 0.94; P<0.001). The percentages of patients with in-hospital refractory or severe ischemia, heart failure, and revascularization procedures were also significantly lower with clopidogrel. There were significantly more patients with major bleeding in the clopidogrel group than in the placebo group (3.7 percent vs. 2.7 percent; relative risk, 1.38; P=0.001), but there were not significantly more patients with episodes of life-threatening bleeding (2.2 percent [corrected] vs. 1.8 percent; P=0.13) or hemorrhagic strokes (0.1 percent vs. 0.1 percent). The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel has beneficial effects in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. However, the risk of major bleeding is increased among patients treated with clopidogrel.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial

              We hypothesised that ticagrelor, in combination with aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor alone, improves outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention compared with standard antiplatelet regimens.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arch Med Sci
                Arch Med Sci
                AMS
                Archives of Medical Science : AMS
                Termedia Publishing House
                1734-1922
                1896-9151
                07 November 2022
                2022
                : 18
                : 6
                : 1689-1692
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical, Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
                [2 ]Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
                [4 ]Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy
                [5 ]Heart Institute, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, ACTION Study Group-CHU Pitié-Salpétrière Paris, Paris, France
                [6 ]Collège National des Cardiologues Français (CNCF), Paris, France
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Pierre Sabouret MD, Heart Institute, Cardiology Department 47-83 Bld de l’hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital Sorbonne University F-75013 Paris, France. Phone: +33 6 69 70 79 79. E-mail: cardiology.sabouret@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                155411
                10.5114/aoms/155411
                9710287
                36457983
                f1c89a43-ec2c-42bc-b636-ff84ed8fa131
                Copyright: © 2022 Termedia & Banach

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

                History
                : 05 October 2022
                : 14 October 2022
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article