30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Local shape feature fusion for improved matching, pose estimation and 3D object recognition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We provide new insights to the problem of shape feature description and matching, techniques that are often applied within 3D object recognition pipelines. We subject several state of the art features to systematic evaluations based on multiple datasets from different sources in a uniform manner. We have carefully prepared and performed a neutral test on the datasets for which the descriptors have shown good recognition performance. Our results expose an important fallacy of previous results, namely that the performance of the recognition system does not correlate well with the performance of the descriptor employed by the recognition system. In addition to this, we evaluate several aspects of the matching task, including the efficiency of the different features, and the potential in using dimension reduction. To arrive at better generalization properties, we introduce a method for fusing several feature matches with a limited processing overhead. Our fused feature matches provide a significant increase in matching accuracy, which is consistent over all tested datasets. Finally, we benchmark all features in a 3D object recognition setting, providing further evidence of the advantage of fused features, both in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Performance evaluation of local descriptors.

          In this paper, we compare the performance of descriptors computed for local interest regions, as, for example, extracted by the Harris-Affine detector. Many different descriptors have been proposed in the literature. It is unclear which descriptors are more appropriate and how their performance depends on the interest region detector. The descriptors should be distinctive and at the same time robust to changes in viewing conditions as well as to errors of the detector. Our evaluation uses as criterion recall with respect to precision and is carried out for different image transformations. We compare shape context, steerable filters, PCA-SIFT, differential invariants, spin images, SIFT, complex filters, moment invariants, and cross-correlation for different types of interest regions. We also propose an extension of the SIFT descriptor and show that it outperforms the original method. Furthermore, we observe that the ranking of the descriptors is mostly independent of the interest region detector and that the SIFT-based descriptors perform best. Moments and steerable filters show the best performance among the low dimensional descriptors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A method for registration of 3-D shapes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anbu@mmmi.sdu.dk
                hgp@mmmi.sdu.dk
                norbert@mmmi.sdu.dk
                Journal
                Springerplus
                Springerplus
                SpringerPlus
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2193-1801
                8 March 2016
                8 March 2016
                2016
                : 5
                : 297
                Affiliations
                Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5904-6981
                Article
                1906
                10.1186/s40064-016-1906-1
                4783326
                27066334
                f1e0f291-2f8b-4bb8-94e8-be2e87801ef7
                © Buch et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 30 September 2015
                : 17 February 2016
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Uncategorized
                3d shape descriptors,3d object recognition,shape matching,feature fusion
                Uncategorized
                3d shape descriptors, 3d object recognition, shape matching, feature fusion

                Comments

                Comment on this article