4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Toward a resolution of inconsistencies in the phonological deficit theory of reading disorders: phonological reading difficulties are more severe in high-IQ poor readers.

      1 ,
      Journal of learning disabilities
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study examined whether high- and low-IQ poor readers differed in patterns of reading performance. Ten-year-old poor readers with IQ scores of 110 and higher showed difficulty in taking a phonological approach to reading, failing to show an advantage in reading high-frequency regular versus irregular words and showing impaired nonword reading accuracy for their reading age. However, poor readers with IQ scores of 90 and below showed a more phonological approach to reading, with better reading of regular than irregular words of both high and low frequency, and with nonword reading skills slower than, but as accurate as, those of reading-age controls. We concluded that the high-IQ poor readers experienced difficulty in taking a phonological approach to reading, whereas the low-IQ poor readers had much less marked phonological problems, supporting Stanovich's phonological-core variable-difference model.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Learn Disabil
          Journal of learning disabilities
          SAGE Publications
          0022-2194
          0022-2194
          2007
          : 40
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, University of Hull, England. r.s.johnston@hull.ac.uk
          Article
          10.1177/00222194070400010501
          17274548
          f2b7f14a-d40f-4ef4-a0ee-d3309cf4a4ef
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article