Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and objective

          Neonatal sepsis (NS) continues to be a critical healthcare priority for the coming decades worldwide. The aim of this study was to critically appraise the quality of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for neonatal sepsis and to summarize and compare their recommendations.

          Methods

          This study involves a systematic review of CPGs. We identified clinical questions and eligibility criteria and searched and screened for CPGs using bibliographic and CPG databases and professional societies. Each included CPG was assessed by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. We summarized the recommendations in a comparison practical table. The systematic review was drafted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Its protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42021258732).

          Results

          Our search retrieved 4,432 citations; of which five CPGs were eligible and appraised: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP 2018) (35 and 34 weeks); Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS 2017); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2021); and Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Services (QH 2020). Among these, the overall assessment of two evidence-based CPGs scored > 70% (NICE and QH), which was consistent with their higher scores in the six domains of the AGREE II instrument. In domain 3 (rigor of development), NICE and QH scored 99 and 60%, respectively. In domain 5 (applicability), they scored 96 and 74%, respectively, and in domain 6 (editorial independence), they scored 90 and 71%, respectively.

          Conclusion

          The methodological quality of the NICE CPG was superior followed by the QH CPG with relevant recommendations for use in practice.

          Systematic review registration

          https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021258732, PROSPERO (CRD42021258732).

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neonatal sepsis.

              Neonatal sepsis is the cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Precise estimates of neonatal sepsis burden vary by setting. Differing estimates of disease burden have been reported from high-income countries compared with reports from low-income and middle-income countries. The clinical manifestations range from subclinical infection to severe manifestations of focal or systemic disease. The source of the pathogen might be attributed to an in-utero infection, acquisition from maternal flora, or postnatal acquisition from the hospital or community. The timing of exposure, inoculum size, immune status of the infant, and virulence of the causative agent influence the clinical expression of neonatal sepsis. Immunological immaturity of the neonate might result in an impaired response to infectious agents. This is especially evident in premature infants whose prolonged stays in hospital and need for invasive procedures place them at increased risk for hospital-acquired infections. Clinically, there is often little difference between sepsis that is caused by an identified pathogen and sepsis that is caused by an unknown pathogen. Culture-independent diagnostics, the use of sepsis prediction scores, judicious antimicrobial use, and the development of preventive measures including maternal vaccines are ongoing efforts designed to reduce the burden of neonatal sepsis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                16 August 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 891572
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Pediatrics Department, King Khalid University Hospital , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [2] 2Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality Research Unit, Quality Management Department, King Saud University Medical City , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [3] 3Research Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care and Knowledge Translation, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [4] 4Alexandria Center for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, Alexandria University , Alexandria, Egypt
                [5] 5Adaptation Working Group, Guidelines International Network , Perth, Scotland
                [6] 6Pediatrics Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [7] 7Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [8] 8Saudi Neonatology Society (SNS) , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [9] 9Neonatology Department, Ministry of Health , Assir, Saudi Arabia
                [10] 10Neonatology Department, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of Health , Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                [11] 11Clinical Pharmacy Department, Pharmacy Services, Second Health Cluster in Central Region , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [12] 12Pharmacy Department, King Fahad Medical City, Ministry of Health , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [13] 13Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Fahad Medical City, Ministry of Health , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [14] 14College of Nursing, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [15] 15Saab Medical Library, University Libraries, American University of Beirut , Beirut, Lebanon
                [16] 16Wegner Health Sciences Library, University of South Dakota , Sioux Falls, SD, United States
                [17] 17Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military Medical City , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [18] 18Morbidity and Mortality Unit, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [19] 19Public Health and Community Medicine Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Academy of Scientific Research , Cairo, Egypt
                [20] 20Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital , Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Venkataseshan Sundaram, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), India

                Reviewed by: Tao Xiong, Sichuan University, China; Deepak Chawla, Government Medical College and Hospital, India

                This article was submitted to Neonatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2022.891572
                9424847
                f2bc4654-166c-4e9b-8dfc-c7c9eeceb414
                Copyright © 2022 Amer, Shaiba, Hadid, Anabrees, Almehery, AAssiri, Alnemri, Darwish, Baqawi, Aboshaiqah, Hneiny, Almaghrabi, El-Malky and Al-Dajani.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 March 2022
                : 14 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 49, Pages: 19, Words: 8143
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Systematic Review

                neonatal sepsis,pediatrics,clinical practice guidelines,systematic review,agree ii instrument,quality assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article