0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early identification of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: data-driven and theory-driven predictive modelling based on electronic medical records of Dutch general practices

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The present study aimed to early identify patients with persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) in primary care by exploring routine care data-based approaches.

          Design/setting

          A cohort study based on routine primary care data from 76 general practices in the Netherlands was executed for predictive modelling.

          Participants

          Inclusion of 94 440 adult patients was based on: at least 7-year general practice enrolment, having more than one symptom/disease registration and >10 consultations.

          Methods

          Cases were selected based on the first PSS registration in 2017–2018. Candidate predictors were selected 2–5 years prior to PSS and categorised into data-driven approaches: symptoms/diseases, medications, referrals, sequential patterns and changing lab results; and theory-driven approaches: constructed factors based on literature and terminology in free text. Of these, 12 candidate predictor categories were formed and used to develop prediction models by cross-validated least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression on 80% of the dataset. Derived models were internally validated on the remaining 20% of the dataset.

          Results

          All models had comparable predictive values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves=0.70 to 0.72). Predictors are related to genital complaints, specific symptoms (eg, digestive, fatigue and mood), healthcare utilisation, and number of complaints. Most fruitful predictor categories are literature-based and medications. Predictors often had overlapping constructs, such as digestive symptoms (symptom/disease codes) and drugs for anti-constipation (medication codes), indicating that registration is inconsistent between general practitioners (GPs).

          Conclusions

          The findings indicate low to moderate diagnostic accuracy for early identification of PSS based on routine primary care data. Nonetheless, simple clinical decision rules based on structured symptom/disease or medication codes could possibly be an efficient way to support GPs in identifying patients at risk of PSS. A full data-based prediction currently appears to be hampered by inconsistent and missing registrations. Future research on predictive modelling of PSS using routine care data should focus on data enrichment or free-text mining to overcome inconsistent registrations and improve predictive accuracy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Using Lasso for Predictor Selection and to Assuage Overfitting: A Method Long Overlooked in Behavioral Sciences

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The association of depression and anxiety with medical symptom burden in patients with chronic medical illness.

              Primary care patients with anxiety and depression often describe multiple physical symptoms, but no systematic review has studied the effect of anxiety and depressive comorbidity in patients with chronic medical illnesses. MEDLINE databases were searched from 1966 through 2006 using the combined search terms diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), asthma, COPD, osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with depression, anxiety and symptoms. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies with >100 patients were included as were all randomized controlled trials that measure the impact of improving anxiety and depressive symptoms on medical symptom outcomes. Thirty-one studies involving 16,922 patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients with chronic medical illness and comorbid depression or anxiety compared to those with chronic medical illness alone reported significantly higher numbers of medical symptoms when controlling for severity of medical disorder. Across the four categories of common medical disorders examined (diabetes, pulmonary disease, heart disease, arthritis), somatic symptoms were at least as strongly associated with depression and anxiety as were objective physiologic measures. Two treatment studies also showed that improvement in depression outcome was associated with decreased somatic symptoms without improvement in physiologic measures. Accurate diagnosis of comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders in patients with chronic medical illness is essential in understanding the cause and in optimizing the management of somatic symptom burden.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2023
                2 May 2023
                : 13
                : 5
                : e066183
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentHealth Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Leiden University Medical Center , The Hague, The Netherlands
                [2 ] departmentHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology unit, Department of Psychology , Leiden University , Leiden, Netherlands
                [3 ] departmentHSR , Ringgold_25802Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [4 ] departmentComputer Science , Ringgold_1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [5 ] Ringgold_8123Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research , Utrecht, Netherlands
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Willeke M Kitselaar; w.m.kitselaar@ 123456vu.nl
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0914-0168
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-5344
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8787-4186
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-6718
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-9101
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0090-5091
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-5426
                Article
                bmjopen-2022-066183
                10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066183
                10163476
                37130660
                f2f86262-da93-44f3-92d1-f75d299e3436
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 June 2022
                : 31 March 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Leiden University Medical Center;
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: Leiden University;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                General practice / Family practice
                1506
                1696
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                primary care,statistics & research methods,mental health
                Medicine
                primary care, statistics & research methods, mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article