9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Synaptic Changes in Parkinson Disease Assessed with in vivo Imaging

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Parkinson disease is characterized by motor and nonmotor symptoms, reduced striatal dopamine signaling, and loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra. It is now known that the pathological process in Parkinson disease may begin decades before the clinical diagnosis and include a variety of neuronal alterations in addition to the dopamine system.

          Methods

          This study examined the density of all synapses with synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) in Parkinson disease subjects with mild bilateral disease (n = 12) and matched normal controls (n = 12) using in vivo high‐resolution positron emission tomographic imaging as well as postmortem autoradiography in an independent sample with Parkinson disease (n = 15) and normal controls (n = 13) in the substantia nigra and putamen.

          Results

          A group‐by‐brain region interaction effect ( F 10, 22 = 3.52, p = 0.007) was observed in the primary brain areas with in vivo SV2A binding. Post hoc analyses revealed that the Parkinson disease group exhibited lower SV2A in the substantia nigra (−45%; p < 0.001), red nucleus (−31%; p = 0.03), and locus coeruleus (−17%; p = 0.03). Exploratory analyses also revealed lower SV2A binding in clinically relevant cortical areas. Using autoradiography, we confirmed lower SV2A in the substantia nigra (−17%; p < 0.005) and nonsignificant findings in the putamen (−4%; p = 0.06).

          Interpretation

          This work provides the first evidence of synaptic loss in brainstem nuclei involved in the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease in living patients. SV2A imaging holds promise for understanding synaptic changes central to the disease. Ann Neurol 2020;87:329–338

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The synaptic pathology of α-synuclein aggregation in dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson’s disease dementia

          Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are usually associated with loss of dopaminergic neurons. Loss of substantia nigra neurons and presence of Lewy body inclusions in some of the remaining neurons are the hallmark pathology seen in the final stages of the disease. Attempts to correlate Lewy body pathology to either cell death or severity of clinical symptoms, however, have not been successful. While the pathophysiology of the neurodegenerative process can hardly be explained by Lewy bodies, the clinical symptoms do indicate a degenerative process located at the presynapse resulting in a neurotransmitter deficiency. Recently it was shown that 90% or even more of α-synuclein aggregates in DLB cases were located at the presynapses in the form of very small deposits. In parallel, dendritic spines are retracted, whereas the presynapses are relatively preserved, suggesting a neurotransmitter deprivation. The same α-synuclein pathology can be demonstrated for PD. These findings give rise to the notion that not cell death but rather α-synuclein aggregate-related synaptic dysfunction causes the neurodegeneration. This opens new perspectives for understanding PD and DLB. If presynaptic α-synuclein aggregation, not neuronal loss, is the key issue of the neurodegenerative process, then PD and DLB may eventually be treatable in the future. The disease may progress via trans-synaptical spread, suggesting that stem cell transplants are of limited use. Future therapies may focus on the regeneration of synapses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Automated labeling of the human brain: a preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method.

            A forward-transform method for retrieving brain labels from the 1988 Talairach Atlas using x-y-z coordinates is presented. A hierarchical volume-occupancy labeling scheme was created to simplify the organization of atlas labels using volume and subvolumetric components. Segmentation rules were developed to define boundaries that were not given explicitly in the atlas. The labeling scheme and segmentation rules guided the segmentation and labeling of 160 contiguous regions within the atlas. A unique three-dimensional (3-D) database label server called the Talairach Daemon (http://ric.uthscsa.edu/projects) was developed for serving labels keyed to the Talairach coordinate system. Given an x-y-z Talairach coordinate, a corresponding hierarchical listing of labels is returned by the server. The accuracy and precision of the forward-transform labeling method is now under evaluation. Copyright (c) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing Synaptic Density in Alzheimer Disease With Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging

              Question Can we measure synaptic loss in Alzheimer disease in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET) with the specific radioligand 11 C-UCB-J? Findings This cross-sectional PET imaging study examined 11 C-UCB-J–specific binding as a biomarker for synaptic density in 11 cognitively normal elderly participants and 10 participants with mild cognitive impairment to early Alzheimer disease. Significant reductions of hippocampal synaptic densities were found in participants with Alzheimer disease compared with age-matched participants who were cognitively normal. Meaning PET scanning with 11 C-UCB-J may provide a direct measure of synaptic density in Alzheimer disease in vivo; it yields results consistent with previous neuropathological investigations. This cross-sectional study compares synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A binding in the brains of participants with Alzheimer disease and cognitively normal participants using positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging. Importance Synaptic loss is well established as the major structural correlate of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease (AD). The ability to measure synaptic density in vivo could accelerate the development of disease-modifying treatments for AD. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A is an essential vesicle membrane protein expressed in virtually all synapses and could serve as a suitable target for synaptic density. Objective To compare hippocampal synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) binding in participants with AD and cognitively normal participants using positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study recruited 10 participants with AD and 11 participants who were cognitively normal between November 2015 and June 2017. We hypothesized a reduction in hippocampal SV2A binding in AD, based on the early degeneration of entorhinal cortical cell projections to the hippocampus (via the perforant path) and hippocampal SV2A reductions that had been observed in postmortem studies. Participants underwent high-resolution PET scanning with ( (R) -1-((3-(11C-methyl-11C)pyridin-4-yl)methyl)-4-(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-one), a compound more commonly known as 11 C-UCB-J, for SV2A. They also underwent high-resolution PET scanning with carbon 11–labeled Pittsburgh Compound B ( 11 C-PiB) for β-amyloid, magnetic resonance imaging, and cognitive and neurologic evaluation. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes were 11 C-UCB-J–specific binding (binding potential [ BP ND ]) via PET imaging in brain regions of interest in participants with AD and participants who were cognitively normal. Results Ten participants with AD (5 male and 5 female; mean [SD] age, 72.7 [6.3] years; 10 [100%] β-amyloid positive) were compared with 11 participants who were cognitively normal (5 male and 6 female; mean [SD] age, 72.9 [8.7] years; 11 [100%] β-amyloid negative). Participants with AD spanned the disease stages from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (n = 5) to mild dementia (n = 5). Participants with AD had significant reduction in hippocampal SV2A specific binding (41%) compared with cognitively normal participants, as assessed by 11 C-UCB-J–PET BP ND (cognitively normal participants: mean [SD] BP ND , 1.47 [0.37]; participants with AD: 0.87 [0.50]; P  = .005). These reductions remained significant after correction for atrophy (ie, partial volume correction; participants who were cognitively normal: mean [SD], 2.71 [0.46]; participants with AD: 2.15 [0.55]; P  = .02). Hippocampal SV2A-specific binding BP ND was correlated with a composite episodic memory score in the overall sample ( R  = 0.56; P  = .01). Conclusions and Relevance To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate synaptic density in vivo in AD using 11 C-UCB-J–PET imaging. This approach may provide a direct measure of synaptic density, and it therefore holds promise as an in vivo biomarker for AD and as an outcome measure for trials of disease-modifying therapies, particularly those targeted at the preservation and restoration of synapses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                david.matuskey@yale.edu
                Journal
                Ann Neurol
                Ann. Neurol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1531-8249
                ANA
                Annals of Neurology
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0364-5134
                1531-8249
                05 February 2020
                March 2020
                : 87
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/ana.v87.3 )
                : 329-338
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Positron Emission Tomography Research Center, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging Yale University New Haven CT
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychiatry Yale University New Haven CT
                [ 3 ] Department of Neurology Yale University New Haven CT
                [ 4 ] Translational Imaging Integrated Science and Technology AbbVie North Chicago IL
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address correspondence to

                Dr Matuskey, Yale PET Center, 801 Howard Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519.

                E‐mail: david.matuskey@ 123456yale.edu

                [†]

                S.J.F. and R.E.C. contributed equally as last authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-6572
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4408-2621
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9338-7966
                Article
                ANA25682
                10.1002/ana.25682
                7065227
                31953875
                f35d1618-aeea-4091-ba5c-7d6eb8f08a11
                © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 04 October 2019
                : 13 January 2020
                : 14 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 10, Words: 6648
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.7 mode:remove_FC converted:11.03.2020

                Neurology
                Neurology

                Comments

                Comment on this article