6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Revalidation and adaptation of the Menstrual Practice Needs Scale (MPNS) in a cross-sectional survey to measure the menstrual experiences of adult women working in Mukono District, Uganda

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale (MPNS) is a comprehensive measure of menstrual self-care experience including access to sufficient, comfortable materials to catch or absorb bleeding, supportive spaces for managing menstruation and for disposal and laundering of used materials. It addresses a critical measurement gap to improve quantitative menstrual health research and programme evaluation. The scale was validated in a population of adolescent schoolgirls. This study appraises its performance among adult women.

          Design

          Cross-sectional survey.

          Setting and participants

          Seven cognitive interviews provided insights into the interpretability of scale items. A survey of 525 working women who had menstruated in the past 6 months (435 working in markets, 45 in schools and 45 working in healthcare facilities) in Mukono District, Uganda was used to test the dimensionality, reliability and validity of the measure.

          Results

          The 36 scale items were well understood by the study population. Dimensionality was tested for the 28 items relevant to women disposing of menstrual materials and 32 items relevant to those washing and reusing materials. The original subscale structure fit with the data, however, fell short of recommended thresholds for those disposing of materials (root mean squared error of approximation, RMSEA=0.069; Comparative Fit Index, CFI=0.840; Trucker-Lewis Index, TLI=0.824). An alternative subscale structure was an acceptable fit for those disposing (RMSEA=0.051; CFI=0.911; TLI=0.897) and reusing materials (RMSEA=0.053; CFI=0.915; TLI=0.904). MPNS total and subscale scores demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. Higher scores reflected more positive menstrual experiences and were associated with well-being (total score r=0.24, p<0.001), not missing work due to the last menstrual period (total score OR=2.47 95% CI 1.42 to 4.30) and confidence to manage menstruation.

          Conclusions

          The MPNS offers a valid and reliable way to assess menstrual health needs. The revised factor structure can be used for samples of adult workers. Findings also highlight challenges in assessing the variety of experiences relevant to managing menstrual bleeding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.

            The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most widely used questionnaires assessing subjective psychological well-being. Since its first publication in 1998, the WHO-5 has been translated into more than 30 languages and has been used in research studies all over the world. We now provide a systematic review of the literature on the WHO-5.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                1 July 2022
                : 12
                : 7
                : e057662
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program , Burnet Institute , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences , Makerere University , Kampala, Central, Uganda
                [4 ] departmentEpidemiology & Biostatistics , Makerere University , Kampala, Kampala, Uganda
                [5 ] departmentEnvironmental Health and Engineering , Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Julie Hennegan; julie.hennegan@ 123456burnet.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2011-1595
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-6183
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7385-423X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-7325
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-4034
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4966-8517
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-057662
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057662
                9252208
                35777879
                f3724344-1ad3-4983-b673-4e03c1d155c0
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 September 2021
                : 16 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Osprey Foundation of Maryland;
                Award ID: NA
                Funded by: The Case for Her;
                Award ID: NA
                Categories
                Global Health
                1506
                1699
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                public health,reproductive medicine,mental health
                Medicine
                public health, reproductive medicine, mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article