14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ischial tuberosity: new donor site for bone grafts in animal cleft research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the context of cleft repair in animal research in rat models, different areas can be used for bone grafting. The aim of the present study was to present the tuberosity of the ischium as a new donor site and to evaluate its quality in relation to an artificial alveolar cleft. Four weeks after creating experimental alveolar clefts in seven Wistar rats, the repair was performed in the now twelve-week-old male animals using bone blocks grafted from the ischial tuberosity. Two days before surgery and two as well as twenty-eight days after surgery, microCT scans were performed, and the grafted bone blocks were analyzed regarding height, width, thickness, and volume. Additionally, bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were measured in the repaired cleft. The mean bone volume of the graft was about 19.77 ± 7.77mm 3. Immediately after jaw reconstruction the BMD and BV/TV were about 0.54 ± 0.05 g/cm 3 and 54.9 ± 5.07% for the transplant and about 1.13 ± 0.08 g/cm 3 and 94.5 ± 3.70%, respectively, for the surrounding bone. Four weeks later the BMD and BV/TV were about 0.57 ± 0.13 g/cm 3 and 56.60 ± 13.70% for the transplant and about 11.17 ± 0.07 g/cm 3 and 97.50 ± 2.15%, respectively, for the surrounding bone. A hip fracture was found in four of the animals after surgery. The ischial tuberosity offers large bone blocks, which are sufficient for cleft repair in the rat model. However, the bone quality regarding BMD and BV/TV is less compared with the surrounding bone of the alveolar cleft, even after a period of 4 weeks, despite recognizable renovation processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human's

            By late 18th or early 19th century, albino rats became the most commonly used experimental animals in numerous biomedical researches, as they have been recognized as the preeminent model mammalian system. But, the precise correlation between age of laboratory rats and human is still a subject of debate. A number of studies have tried to detect these correlations in various ways, But, have not successfully provided any proper association. Thus, the current review attempts to compare rat and human age at different phases of their life. The overall findings indicate that rats grow rapidly during their childhood and become sexually mature at about the sixth week, but attain social maturity 5-6 months later. In adulthood, every day of the animal is approximately equivalent to 34.8 human days (i.e., one rat month is comparable to three human years). Numerous researchers performed experimental investigations in albino rats and estimated, in general, while considering their entire life span, that a human month resembles every-day life of a laboratory rat. These differences signify the variations in their anatomy, physiology and developmental processes, which must be taken into consideration while analyzing the results or selecting the dose of any research in rats when age is a crucial factor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials

              Summary Large bone defects are serious complications that are most commonly caused by extensive trauma, tumour, infection, or congenital musculoskeletal disorders. If nonunion occurs, implantation for repairing bone defects with biomaterials developed as a defect filler, which can promote bone regeneration, is essential. In order to evaluate biomaterials to be developed as bone substitutes for bone defect repair, it is essential to establish clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo testing models for investigating their biocompatibility, mechanical properties, degradation, and interactional with culture medium or host tissues. The results of the in vitro experiment contribute significantly to the evaluation of direct cell response to the substitute biomaterial, and the in vivo tests constitute a step midway between in vitro tests and human clinical trials. Therefore, it is essential to develop or adopt a suitable in vivo bone defect animal model for testing bone substitutes for defect repair. This review aimed at introducing and discussing the most available and commonly used bone defect animal models for testing specific substitute biomaterials. Additionally, we reviewed surgical protocols for establishing relevant preclinical bone defect models with various animal species and the evaluation methodologies of the bone regeneration process after the implantation of bone substitute biomaterials. This review provides an important reference for preclinical studies in translational orthopaedics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                stephan.moehlhenrich@uni-wh.de
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                26 November 2020
                26 November 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 20699
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412581.b, ISNI 0000 0000 9024 6397, Department of Orthodontics, , University of Witten/Herdecke, ; Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455 Witten, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.412301.5, ISNI 0000 0000 8653 1507, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, , University Hospital of Aachen, ; Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
                [3 ]GRID grid.1957.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0728 696X, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, , RWTH Aachen University, ; Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074 Aachen, Germany
                Article
                77862
                10.1038/s41598-020-77862-w
                7691372
                f3890c38-1630-40be-9524-343ef1cbb415
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 August 2020
                : 17 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: START-Program of the Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Germany
                Award ID: 104/18
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Projekt DEAL
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                experimental models of disease,preclinical research
                Uncategorized
                experimental models of disease, preclinical research

                Comments

                Comment on this article