40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.2 Impact Factor I 6.4 CiteScore I 0.914 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Role of Brain Biomarkers S-100-Beta and Neuron-Specific Enolase for Detection and Follow-Up of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis before, during and after Treatment with L-Ornithine-L-Aspartate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), in the context of liver cirrhosis, seems to result from low-grade cerebral edema of the astrocytes. Serum brain biomarkers S-100-beta und neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are often elevated in brain injury. We hypothesized that neuromarkers S-100-beta and NSE can be used in the diagnosis of HE, compared with standardized diagnostic tools. Material and Methods: A prospective non-randomized intervention study was performed using L-ornithine-L-aspartate (LOLA) for HE treatment. Primary endpoint was the evaluation of neuromarkers S-100-beta and NSE for detection and diagnosis of follow-up of HE. As secondary endpoints, the efficacy of LOLA on the course of HE and the diagnostic role of Portosystemic-Encephalopathy-Syndrome score (PHES) and critical flicker frequency (CFF) were analyzed. For diagnosis of covert (CHE) and overt (OHE) HE, West-Haven criteria (WHC), PHES and CFF were assessed at study entry. LOLA was applied (20 g i.v.) for 6 days. At the end of the study, HE evaluation was repeated. S-100-beta, NSE and ammonia were assessed in each patient before, during and after therapy with LOLA. Results: 30 patients were included. At study entry, CHE was diagnosed in 50% and OHE in 50% of all subjects. A total of 25 participants completed the study. After LOLA therapy, deterioration of HE occurred in <11%, while most patients showed improvement (e.g. improved CFF in 79%). No significant correlation with HE severity (as diagnosed by WHC, PHES and CFF) could be demonstrated for any biochemical parameter. In addition, there were no significant changes in brain biomarkers during the treatment period. Discussion: While CFF as well as PHES showed good correlation with treatment response, S-100-beta and NSE did not significantly correlate with HE severity compared to proven diagnostic methods, and do not seem reliable biochemical markers for the follow-up under therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Clinical epidemiology and disease burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

            Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as the presence of hepatic fat accumulation after the exclusion of other causes of hepatic steatosis, including other causes of liver disease, excessive alcohol consumption, and other conditions that may lead to hepatic steatosis. NAFLD encompasses a broad clinical spectrum ranging from nonalcoholic fatty liver to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NAFLD is the most common liver disease in the world and NASH may soon become the most common indication for liver transplantation. Ongoing persistence of obesity with increasing rate of diabetes will increase the prevalence of NAFLD, and as this population ages, many will develop cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. There has been a general increase in the prevalence of NAFLD, with Asia leading the rise, yet the United States is following closely behind with a rising prevalence from 15% in 2005 to 25% within 5 years. NAFLD is commonly associated with metabolic comorbidities, including obesity, type II diabetes, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of NAFLD is constantly evolving. Based on NAFLD subtypes, it has the potential to progress into advanced fibrosis, end-stage liver disease and HCC. The increasing prevalence of NAFLD with advanced fibrosis, is concerning because patients appear to experience higher liver-related and non-liver-related mortality than the general population. The increased morbidity and mortality, healthcare costs and declining health related quality of life associated with NAFLD makes it a formidable disease, and one that requires more in-depth analysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rifaximin treatment in hepatic encephalopathy.

              Hepatic encephalopathy is a chronically debilitating complication of hepatic cirrhosis. The efficacy of rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic, is well documented in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy, but its efficacy for prevention of the disease has not been established. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 299 patients who were in remission from recurrent hepatic encephalopathy resulting from chronic liver disease to receive either rifaximin, at a dose of 550 mg twice daily (140 patients), or placebo (159 patients) for 6 months. The primary efficacy end point was the time to the first breakthrough episode of hepatic encephalopathy. The key secondary end point was the time to the first hospitalization involving hepatic encephalopathy. Rifaximin significantly reduced the risk of an episode of hepatic encephalopathy, as compared with placebo, over a 6-month period (hazard ratio with rifaximin, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.64; P<0.001). A breakthrough episode of hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 22.1% of patients in the rifaximin group, as compared with 45.9% of patients in the placebo group. A total of 13.6% of the patients in the rifaximin group had a hospitalization involving hepatic encephalopathy, as compared with 22.6% of patients in the placebo group, for a hazard ratio of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.87; P=0.01). More than 90% of patients received concomitant lactulose therapy. The incidence of adverse events reported during the study was similar in the two groups, as was the incidence of serious adverse events. Over a 6-month period, treatment with rifaximin maintained remission from hepatic encephalopathy more effectively than did placebo. Rifaximin treatment also significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization involving hepatic encephalopathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00298038.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                PJG
                PJG
                10.1159/issn.2387-1954
                GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
                S. Karger AG
                2341-4545
                2387-1954
                2020
                November 2020
                21 April 2020
                : 27
                : 6
                : 391-403
                Affiliations
                [_a] aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
                [_b] bDepartment for Internal Medicine I, Elblandklinikum, Meißen, Germany
                [_c] cInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
                [_d] dKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Endokrine und Minimal-invasive Chirurgie, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
                [_e] eDepartment for Gastroenterology, Diabetics and Endocrinology, Kemperhof Hospital, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Germany
                Author notes
                *PD Dr. med. Felix Gundling, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Englschalkinger Strasse 77, DE–81925 Munich (Germany), Felix.Gundling@gmx.de
                Article
                507225 GE Port J Gastroenterol 2020;27:391–403
                10.1159/000507225
                f3f595d6-06e4-4679-aaeb-6790212471b8
                © 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 07 December 2019
                : 08 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 3, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Research Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
                S-100-beta,West-Haven criteria,Hepatic encephalopathy,Critical flicker frequency,Cirrhosis,L-ornithine-L-aspartate,Neuron-specific enolase,PSE-testing

                Comments

                Comment on this article