14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: Improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization.

      Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
      Carotid Stenosis, diagnosis, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Child, Computer Simulation, Contrast Media, Gadolinium DTPA, diagnostic use, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, methods, Models, Theoretical

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Quantification of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the tissue residue function (R) using bolus-tracking MRI requires deconvolution of the arterial input function (AIF). Currently, the most commonly used deconvolution method is singular value decomposition (SVD), which has been shown to produce accurate estimations of CBF. However, this method introduces unwanted oscillations in the time course of R, and there are situations in which the actual shape is of interest (e.g., in calculating flow heterogeneity and assessing bolus dispersion). In such cases, the conventional SVD method may no longer be suitable, and an alternative approach may be required. This work describes the implementation of Tikhonov regularization with the L-curve criterion to quantify CBF and obtain a better characterization of R. The methodology is tested on simulated and patient data, and the results are compared to those found using the conventional SVD approach. Although both methods produce similar CBF values, the deconvolved R shape obtained using SVD is dominated by oscillations and fails to characterize the shape in the presence of dispersion. On the other hand, the use of the proposed regularization method improves the characterization of the tissue residue function. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article