24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on all aspects of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Sign up for email alerts here.

      63,741 Monthly downloads/views I 2.989 Impact Factor I 4.5 CiteScore I 1.09 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.744 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An observational study of duloxetine versus SSRI monotherapy for the treatment of painful physical symptoms in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder: primary analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of duloxetine monotherapy, in comparison with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy, in the treatment of painful physical symptoms (PPS) in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in real-world clinical settings.

          Methods

          This was a multicenter, 12-week prospective, observational study. This study enrolled MDD patients with at least moderate PPS, defined as a Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) average pain score (item 5) ≥3. Patients were treated with duloxetine or SSRIs (escitalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, or fluvoxamine) for 12 weeks, and PPS were assessed by BPI-SF average pain score. The primary outcome was early improvement in the BPI-SF average pain score at 4 weeks post-baseline.

          Results

          A total of 523 patients were evaluated for treatment effectiveness (duloxetine N=273, SSRIs N=250). The difference in BPI-SF average pain score between the two groups was not statistically significant at 4 weeks post-baseline, the primary endpoint (least-squares mean change from baseline [95% confidence interval]: duloxetine, −2.8 [−3.1, −2.6]; SSRIs, −2.5 [−2.8, −2.3]; P=0.166). There was a numerical advantage for duloxetine in improvement from 4 to 12 weeks post-baseline, and the difference was statistically significant at 8 weeks post-baseline (least-squares mean change from baseline [95% confidence interval]: duloxetine, −3.6 [−3.9, −3.3]; SSRIs, −3.1 [−3.4, −2.8]; P=0.023). The 30% and 50% responder rates were significantly higher in patients treated with duloxetine at 4 and 8 weeks post-baseline. There were no serious adverse events experienced by duloxetine-treated patients. The rate of discontinuations due to adverse events was similar for duloxetine and the SSRIs (1.0% and 0.8% of patients, respectively).

          Conclusion

          In this observational study, BPI-SF improvement was not significantly different at 4 weeks, the primary endpoint; however, patients treated with duloxetine tended to show better improvement in PPS compared to those treated with SSRIs.

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)

          (2000)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of pain on depression treatment response in primary care.

            Pain commonly coexists with depression, but its impact on treatment outcomes has not been well studied. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated the impact of comorbid pain on depression treatment response and health-related quality of life. We analyzed data from the ARTIST study, a randomized controlled trial with naturalistic follow-up conducted in 37 primary care clinics. Participants were 573 clinically depressed patients randomized to one of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline. Depression as assessed by the Symptom Checklist-20 (SCL-20) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included pain and health-related quality of life. Pain was reported by more than two thirds of depressed patients at baseline, with the severity of pain mild in 25% of patients, moderate in 30%, and severe in 14%. After 3 months of antidepressant therapy, 24% of patients had a poor depression treatment response (ie, SCL-20 >1.3). Multivariate odds ratios for poor treatment response were 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.2) for mild pain, 2.0 (1.1-4.0) for moderate pain, and 4.1 (1.9-8.8) for severe pain compared with those without pain. Increasing pain severity also had an adverse impact on outcomes in multiple domains of health-related quality of life. Pain is present in two thirds of depressed primary care patients begun on antidepressant therapy, and the severity of pain is a strong predictor of poor depression and health-related quality of life outcomes at 3 months. Better recognition, assessment, and treatment of comorbid pain may enhance outcomes of depression therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pain predicts longer time to remission during treatment of recurrent depression.

              Pain and depression are mutually exacerbating. We know that both of these syndromes predict the future occurrence of the other. It has not been shown, however, whether the presence of pain slows the effect of treatment for depression. We hypothesized that greater pain and somatic scores prior to treatment with imipramine and interpersonal psychotherapy would predict a slowed time to remission from depression. We performed secondary data analyses of an archived study. Subjects (N = 230) were between 21 and 65 years of age and were enrolled in a study of maintenance treatment for recurrent unipolar depression. Patients had to meet Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a major depressive episode and historical requirements for at least 3 prior episodes and clear remissions (according to RDC). Patients were also required to have a minimum Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score of 15 and a minimum score of 7 on the Raskin Severity of Depression Scale. This report describes the acute treatment phase, during which all subjects received combination therapy consisting of imipramine hydrochloride (150 to 300 mg) and interpersonal psychotherapy. Pain and somatization were measured with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Higher levels of both pain and somatization predicted a longer time to remission. After controlling for baseline severity of depression, only pain was still significant in predicting a longer time to remission. Headache and muscle soreness were the 2 variables from the pain index whose presence independently predicted a slower remission. Both pain and somatization improved during acute treatment. Subjects with more pain and somatization, after controlling for severity of depression, reported more suicidality. Women reported more pain than men. Pain, but not somatization, predicted a longer time to remission and may be a marker of a more difficult-to-treat depression. Adults with recurrent depression should be screened for the presence of pain prior to treatment, as the presence of these symptoms may require more aggressive treatment or may be a marker for suicidality or the use of dual-mechanism antidepressants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
                Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
                Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
                Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
                Dove Medical Press
                1176-6328
                1178-2021
                2017
                04 August 2017
                : 13
                : 2105-2114
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Bio Medicine, Medicines Development Unit Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan
                [2 ]Medical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd, Osaka, Japan
                [3 ]Pharmacovigilance Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd, Osaka, Japan
                [4 ]Statistical Science, Medicines Development Unit Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan
                [5 ]Scientific Communications, Medicines Development Unit Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K. Kobe, Japan
                [6 ]Bio-Medicines, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
                [7 ]Hitsuji Clinic, Kusatsu, Japan
                [8 ]Shioiri Mental Clinic, Yokosuka, Japan
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Atsushi Kuga, Bio Medicine, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 1-7-5 Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan, Tel +81 78 242 4579, Fax +81 78 242 9939, Email kuga_atsushi@ 123456lilly.com
                Article
                ndt-13-2105
                10.2147/NDT.S131438
                5552143
                f53ee659-368c-4e89-8f96-fa9b5d2745ee
                © 2017 Kuga et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Neurology
                depression,duloxetine,observational study,pain,ssri
                Neurology
                depression, duloxetine, observational study, pain, ssri

                Comments

                Comment on this article