20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Testing the Hip Abductor Muscle Strength of Older Persons Using a Handheld Dynamometer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To investigate the reliability of a clinically applicable method of dynamometry to assess and monitor hip abductor muscle strength in older persons.

          Design:

          Bilateral isometric hip abductor muscle strength measured with a handheld dynamometer, patients supine with the contralateral hip positioned directly against a wall for stabilization. Reliability determined by comparing intra-assessor and inter-assessor results and comparison to a criterion standard (stabilized dynamometer with patients in the standing position).

          Setting:

          UniSA Nutritional Physiology Research Centre.

          Participants:

          Twenty-one patients older than 65 years were recruited from the Royal Adelaide Hospital.

          Main Outcome Measures:

          Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), bias, and limits of agreement calculated to determine reliability.

          Results:

          Intra-assessor and inter-assessor ICCs were high (0.94 and 0.92-0.94, respectively). There was no intra-assessor bias and narrow limits of agreement (±2.4%). There was a small inter-assessor bias but narrow limits of agreement (0.6%-0.9% and ± 2.3%, respectively). There was a wide variation comparing results to the criterion standard (±5.0%-5.2% limits of agreement), highlighting problems attributed to difficulties that the test population had with the standing position used in the criterion standard test.

          Conclusions:

          Testing older persons’ hip abductor muscle strength while in the supine position with optimal pelvic stabilization using a handheld dynamometer is highly reliable. While further studies must be done to assess patients with specific pathologies, this test has potential application to monitor and evaluate the effects of surgical interventions and/or rehabilitation protocols for a variety of conditions affecting hip abductor function such as hip fractures and arthritis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

          At a minimum of one year after operation, we studied 64 patients with 86 total hip arthroplasties (THA) by standard anteroposterior hip and pelvic radiographs and measurement of range of motion and of isometric abduction strength. The femoral offset correlated positively with the range of abduction (p = 0.046). Abduction strength correlated positively with both femoral offset (p = 0.0001) and the length of the abductor lever arm (p = 0.005). Using multiple regression, abduction strength correlated with height (p = 0.017), gender (p = 0.0005), range of flexion (p = 0.047) and the abductor lever arm (p = 0.060). Our findings suggest that greater femoral offset after THA allows both an increased range of abduction and greater abductor strength.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Muscle performance evaluation in orthopaedic practice.

            A Sapega (1990)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing.

              Physical therapists require an accurate, reliable method for measuring muscle strength. They often use manual muscle testing or hand-held dynametric muscle testing (DMT), but few studies document the reliability of MMT or compare the reliability of the two types of testing. We designed this study to determine the intrarater reliability of MMT and DMT. A physical therapist performed manual and dynametric strength tests of the same five muscle groups on 11 patients and then repeated the tests two days later. The correlation coefficients were high and significantly different from zero for four muscle groups tested dynametrically and for two muscle groups tested manually. The test-retest reliability coefficients for two muscle groups tested manually could not be calculated because the values between subjects were identical. We concluded that both MMT and DMT are reliable testing methods, given the conditions described in this study. Both testing methods have specific applications and limitations, which we discuss.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil
                Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil
                GOS
                spgos
                Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2151-4585
                2151-4593
                08 August 2017
                September 2017
                1 September 2018
                : 8
                : 3
                : 166-172
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [2 ]Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [3 ]Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                Author notes
                [*]Daniel H. Awwad, Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Email: danny.awwad@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.1177_2151458517722608
                10.1177/2151458517722608
                5557201
                28835874
                f5a1f4cc-d1f8-47e8-99ab-6399c3a12827
                © The Author(s) 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 13 February 2017
                : 01 June 2017
                : 14 June 2017
                Categories
                Articles

                fragility fractures,gait disorders,occupational therapy,osteoporosis,physical medicine and rehabilitation,physical therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article