20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Oseltamivir and baloxavir: Dual treatment for rapidly developing ARDS on a patient with renal disease

      case-report
      * , , , ,
      IDCases
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Baloxavir is an antiviral influenza medication with a different mechanism of action and its use in combination with oseltamivir has not been reported on patients with severe renal impairment.

          • Immunocompromise patients have a tendency to develop more severe forms of influenza infection. They may benefit from dual therapy.

          • Combination therapy may fasten overall recovery time and decrease the time on extracorporeal oxygenation support.

          Abstract

          Influenza is an annual epidemic disease that in severe cases can lead to the development of ARDS. Current practice recommends the routine use of neuraminidase inhibitors with emerging evidence for the use of endonuclease inhibitors. We present the case of a 22-year-old female with diabetes and IgG4 tubulo-interstitial nephritis that developed rapidly progressive ARDS from influenza infection requiring ventilatory support and extra corporeal oxygenation in which oseltamivir and baloxavir were used in combination. Patient oxygen requirements and imaging improved significantly after treatment initiation, leading to an overall short period of therapy. We present the first case of a patient treated with this combination in the context of chronic kidney disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Steroids for acute respiratory distress syndrome?

          The development and severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are closely related to dysregulated inflammation, and the duration of ARDS and eventual outcomes are related to persistent inflammation and abnormal fibroproliferation. Corticosteroids are potent modulators of inflammation and inhibitors of fibrosis that have been used since the first description of ARDS in attempts to improve outcomes. There is no evidence that corticosteroids prevent the development of ARDS among patients at risk. High-dose and short-course treatment with steroids does not improve the outcomes of patients with ARDS. Additional studies are needed to recommend treatment with steroids for ARDS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Peramivir Compared With Oseltamivir in High-Risk Patients Infected With Influenza A and B Viruses: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

            Summary Optimal management of influenza infection in high-risk groups remains poorly defined. This prospective study compared the efficacy and safety of 2 different systemic neuraminidase inhibitors, peramivir and oseltamivir, in influenza-infected adult outpatients, as well as several inpatients, all of whom were at increased risk for complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Efficacy of oseltamivir-peramivir combination therapy compared to oseltamivir monotherapy for Influenza A (H7N9) infection: a retrospective study

              Background Since the novel H7N9 avian influenza outbreak occurred in China in 2013, neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) such as oseltamivir and peramivir have been used as first-line drugs to treat the influenza virus infection. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of oseltamivir-peramivir combination therapy versus oseltamivir monotherapy. Methods A retrospective study of 82 H7N9 confirmed patients was conducted by reviewing medical charts at the First Affiliated Hospital of ZheJiang University in China from April 1, 2013 to Feb 28, 2014. The patients’ clinical information was collected systematically, and we compared the virology and clinical data between oseltamivir monotherapy group (43 patients) and oseltamivir-peramivir combination group (39 patients). Results The median duration from NAIs administration to H7N9 virus-negative in oseltamivir monotherapy group and oseltamivir-peramivir combination group was 6.50 and 7.00 days (p >0.05), respectively. The median decline of Day 2 to Day 0 (initiation of NAIs therapy) viral load was 0.00 and 0.69 log10 copies/μl (p >0.05) respectively in the monotherapy vs. combination therapy groups. The incidence of new Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome during NAI administration was 63.89 and 77.78 % (p >0.05); while the mortality rates were 25.58 and 43.59 % (p >0.05) in the oseltamivir group vs. oseltamivir-peramivir group. Conclusions Our results suggest that in adults with H7N9 virus infection, the use of oseltamivir-peramivir combination therapy was not superior to oseltamivir monotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                IDCases
                IDCases
                IDCases
                Elsevier
                2214-2509
                22 May 2020
                2020
                22 May 2020
                : 21
                : e00819
                Affiliations
                [0005]Advocate Illinois Medical Center, Internal Medicine Department, 836 W Wellington Ave, Chicago, IL 60657, United States
                Author notes
                Article
                S2214-2509(20)30127-X e00819
                10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e00819
                7256313
                f5e09ec6-4922-426e-9e35-fed563217457
                © 2020 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 9 May 2020
                : 11 May 2020
                : 11 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article