19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Vaccination Coverage Among Children Aged 19–35 Months — United States, 2017

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends routine vaccination by age 24 months against 14 potentially serious illnesses ( 1 ). CDC used data from the 2017 National Immunization Survey-Child (NIS-Child) to assess vaccination coverage at national, state, territorial, and selected local levels among children aged 19–35 months in the United States. Coverage remained high and stable overall, exceeding 90% for ≥3 doses of poliovirus vaccine, ≥1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR), ≥3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB), and ≥1 dose of varicella vaccine. Although the proportion of children who received no vaccine doses by age 24 months was low, this proportion increased gradually from 0.9% for children born in 2011 to 1.3% for children born in 2015. Coverage was lower for most vaccines among uninsured children and those insured by Medicaid, compared with those having private health insurance, and for children living outside of metropolitan statistical areas* (MSAs), compared with those living in MSA principal cities. These disparities could be reduced with greater awareness and use of the Vaccines for Children † (VFC) program, eliminating missed opportunities to vaccinate children during visits to health care providers, and minimizing interruptions in health insurance coverage. The NIS-Child is a random-digit–dialed telephone (cellular and landline) survey of parents/guardians of children aged 19–35 months in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, selected local areas, and U.S. territories. § NIS-Child coverage estimates are based on a provider-reported vaccination history. Interviewers request contact information for all the child’s vaccination providers and permission to contact each provider to obtain vaccination records for that child. All identified providers are mailed an immunization history questionnaire to record dates and types of vaccines administered; data from responding providers are combined to create a synthesized vaccination history for each child. NIS-Child methods, including weighting procedures, have been described. ¶ In 2017, the overall response rate** to the telephone interview portion of the survey was 26.1%. Adequate provider-reported vaccination data †† were available for 53.9% of children with a completed household interview, resulting in a sample size of 15,333 children. T-tests on weighted data were used to evaluate differences in coverage estimates by sociodemographic characteristics; differences were considered statistically significant for p-values <0.05. CDC assessed changes in survey accuracy, estimated components of difference between the 2016 and 2017 NIS-Child estimates, and estimated linear trends in vaccination coverage by month and year of birth using weighted linear regression. §§ No evidence for change in survey accuracy from 2016 to 2017 was detected ( 2 ). 2017 Vaccination Coverage Coverage was >90% for vaccination with ≥3 doses of poliovirus vaccine (92.7%), ≥1 dose of MMR (91.5%), ≥3 doses of HepB (91.4%), and ≥1 dose of varicella vaccine (91.0%) (Table 1). Children were least likely to be up-to-date with ≥2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) (59.7%), the combined 7-vaccine series ¶¶ (70.4%), and rotavirus vaccination (73.2%). Coverage with HepB birth dose was also low (73.6%). TABLE 1 Estimated vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months, by selected vaccines and doses — National Immunization Survey-Child, United States, 2013–2017* Vaccine/Dose Survey year
% (95% CI) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 DTaP† ≥3 doses 94.1 (93.2–95.0) 94.7 (94.0–95.4) 95.0 (94.4–95.5) 93.7 (92.8–94.5)§ 94.0 (93.3–94.7) ≥4 doses 83.1 (81.8–84.3) 84.2 (83.0–85.4) 84.6 (83.5–85.7) 83.4 (82.1–84.6) 83.2 (82.0–84.3) Poliovirus (≥3 doses) 92.7 (91.6–93.6) 93.3 (92.5–94.1) 93.7 (93.0–94.3) 91.9 (90.9–92.9)§ 92.7 (91.9–93.5) MMR (≥1 dose)¶ 91.9 (90.9–92.7) 91.5 (90.6–92.4) 91.9 (91.0–92.7) 91.1 (90.1–92.0) 91.5 (90.6–92.3) Hib Primary series** 93.7 (92.7–94.5) 93.3 (92.5–94.1) 94.3 (93.7–94.9) 92.8 (91.8–93.6)§ 92.8 (91.9–93.6) Full series** 82.0 (80.7–83.3) 82.0 (80.7–83.2) 82.7 (81.5–83.8) 81.8 (80.5–83.0) 80.7 (79.4–82.0) HepB ≥3 doses 90.8 (89.7–91.7) 91.6 (90.7–92.4) 92.6 (91.9–93.3) 90.5 (89.3–91.5)§ 91.4 (90.5–92.3) Birth dose†† 74.2 (72.8–75.7)§ 72.4 (70.9–73.9) 72.4 (71.0–73.7) 71.1 (69.5–72.7) 73.6 (72.0–75.2)§ Varicella (≥1 dose)¶ 91.2 (90.2–92.1) 91.0 (90.1–91.9) 91.8 (91.0–92.5) 90.6 (89.6–91.5) 91.0 (90.1–91.8) PCV ≥3 doses 92.4 (91.4–93.3) 92.6 (91.8–93.4) 93.3 (92.5–94.0) 91.8 (90.8–92.7)§ 91.9 (90.9–92.8) ≥4 doses 82.0 (80.6–83.3) 82.9 (81.6–84.2) 84.1 (83.0–85.2) 81.8 (80.4–83.1)§ 82.4 (81.1–83.6) HepA ≥1 dose 83.1 (81.9–84.3)§ 85.1 (84.0–86.2)§ 85.8 (84.7–86.8) 86.1 (84.9–87.2) 86.0 (84.8–87.1) ≥2 doses§§ 54.7 (53.1–56.3) 57.5 (55.9–59.1)§ 59.6 (58.1–61.0) 60.6 (59.1–62.2) 59.7 (58.2–61.3) Rotavirus¶¶ 72.6 (71.1–74.0)§ 71.7 (70.1–73.2) 73.2 (71.8–74.6) 74.1 (72.6–75.5) 73.2 (71.6–74.7) Combined 7-vaccine series*** 70.4 (68.8–71.9) 71.6 (70.2–73.1) 72.2 (70.9–73.6) 70.7 (69.2–72.2) 70.4 (68.9–71.9) No vaccinations 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 1.1 (0.9–1.4)§ Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DTaP = diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis vaccine; HepA = hepatitis A vaccine; HepB = hepatitis B vaccine; Hib = Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; PCV = pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. * For 2013, children born during January 2010–May 2012; for 2014, children born during January 2011–May 2013; for 2015, children born during January 2012–May 2014; for 2016, children born during January 2013–May 2015; and for 2017, children born during January 2014–May 2016. † Includes children who might have been vaccinated with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccine or diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine. § Statistically significant (p<0.05) change in coverage compared with previous survey year. ¶ Includes children who might have been vaccinated with measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine. ** Hib primary series: ≥2 or ≥3 doses, depending on product type received; full series includes primary series and booster dose, which includes receipt of ≥3 or ≥4 doses, depending on product type received. †† One dose of HepB administered from birth through age 3 days. §§ Estimates of ≥2 doses of HepA are likely underestimates because a child could be on schedule but not receive a second dose of HepA until age 41 months. This dose would not be collected by NIS-Child, which includes children aged 19–35 months only. ¶¶ Includes ≥2 doses of Rotarix monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1), or ≥3 doses of RotaTeq pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5). The maximum age for the final rotavirus dose is 8 months, 0 days. *** The combined 7-vaccine series (4:3:1:3*:3:1:4) includes ≥4 doses of DTaP, ≥3 doses of poliovirus vaccine, ≥1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, the full series of Hib (≥3 or ≥4 doses, depending on product type), ≥3 doses of HepB, ≥1 dose of varicella vaccine, and ≥4 doses of PCV. Vaccination Coverage by Selected Characteristics Coverage was lower (range = 2.6–6.9 percentage points) for children living in non-MSAs than among those living in MSA principal cities for most vaccines (Table 2). Children living in non-MSAs had a higher prevalence of having received no vaccinations (1.9%) compared with children in MSA principal cities (1.0%). TABLE 2 Estimated vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months, by selected vaccines and doses, metropolitan statistical area (MSA) status,* and health insurance status † — National Immunization Survey-Child, United States, 2017 § Vaccine/Dose MSA status
% (95% CI) Health insurance status
% (95% CI) MSA, principal city (referent)
 (n = 6,689) MSA, non-principal city
(n = 5,846) Non-MSA
(n = 2,798) Private only (referent)
(n = 8,536) Any Medicaid
(n = 5,714) Other insurance
(n = 644) Uninsured
(n = 439) DTaP¶ ≥3 doses 94.6 (93.4–95.6) 94.1 (92.9–95.0) 91.6 (89.1–93.6)** 96.5 (95.7–97.2) 92.6 (91.2–93.8)** 93.7 (90.7–95.8)** 78.2 (71.3–83.8)** ≥4 doses 85.0 (83.3–86.5) 82.6 (80.6–84.5) 78.1 (74.9–80.9)** 86.9 (85.2–88.5) 80.8 (78.9–82.5)** 83.6 (79.3–87.2) 62.4 (55.0–69.1)** Poliovirus (≥3 doses) 93.2 (91.9–94.4) 92.9 (91.7–93.9) 90.1 (87.4–92.2)** 95.2 (94.3–96.0) 91.2 (89.6–92.5)** 92.7 (89.5–95.0) 77.9 (71.0–83.6)** MMR†† (≥1 dose) 92.5 (91.2–93.6) 90.9 (89.3–92.3) 89.9 (88.0–91.6)** 93.7 (92.3–94.8) 90.4 (89.1–91.6)** 91.0 (87.5–93.6) 74.6 (67.5–80.6)** Hib Primary series§§ 93.4 (92.2–94.5) 92.6 (91.1–93.9) 91.2 (88.7–93.2) 95.5 (94.6–96.2) 91.1 (89.5–92.5)** 92.2 (88.8–94.7)** 78.0 (71.1–83.7)** Full series§§ 81.6 (79.6–83.4) 80.7 (78.6–82.7) 77.3 (74.1–80.2)** 85.1 (83.2–86.9) 77.7 (75.6–79.7)** 78.8 (73.8–83.1)** 62.0 (54.6–68.9)** HepB ≥3 doses 92.6 (91.3–93.7) 90.4 (88.7–91.9)** 90.7 (88.8–92.3) 93.3 (91.9–94.4) 90.4 (88.8–91.7)** 92.5 (89.4–94.7) 78.6 (71.8–84.1)** Birth dose¶¶ 73.6 (71.1–76.0) 72.8 (70.3–75.1) 76.6 (73.6–79.3) 73.0 (70.9–75.0) 74.7 (72.0–77.2) 71.8 (66.2–76.8) 68.7 (61.9–74.8) Varicella†† (≥1 dose) 92.3 (91.0–93.4) 90.4 (88.7–91.8) 88.3 (86.2–90.1)** 92.9 (91.5–94.1) 90.4 (89.1–91.6)** 91.3 (88.0–93.8) 69.5 (62.2–76.0)** PCV ≥3 doses 92.2 (90.5–93.6) 91.9 (90.4–93.2) 90.6 (88.0–92.6) 94.5 (92.9–95.7) 90.5 (88.9–91.8)** 91.0 (87.6–93.5)** 75.2 (67.9–81.2)** ≥4 doses 83.6 (81.7–85.4) 82.0 (79.9–84.0) 79.1 (75.9–81.9)** 87.6 (85.8–89.3) 78.9 (76.8–80.8)** 81.3 (76.8–85.2)** 59.0 (51.6–66.1)** HepA ≥1 dose 87.2 (85.3–88.9) 85.7 (83.9–87.4) 82.5 (80.1–84.6)** 88.1 (86.5–89.6) 85.3 (83.5–87.0)** 86.1 (81.7–89.5) 63.3 (55.7–70.3)** ≥2 doses 61.1 (58.7–63.4) 59.2 (56.7–61.6) 56.5 (53.3–59.7)** 63.2 (61.0–65.2) 57.7 (55.2–60.2)** 61.1 (55.2–66.7) 35.7 (29.1–42.9)** Rotavirus*** 73.8 (71.3–76.2) 73.3 (70.7–75.7) 70.5 (67.3–73.6) 81.8 (79.8–83.6) 66.8 (64.2–69.4)** 67.4 (61.0–73.3)** 51.5 (44.2–58.7)** Combined 7-vaccine series††† 71.9 (69.7–74.1) 69.8 (67.4–72.2) 66.8 (63.6–69.9)** 76.0 (73.9–77.9) 66.5 (64.1–68.9)** 69.2 (63.6–74.2)** 48.5 (41.2–55.8)** No vaccinations 1.0 (0.7–1.3) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 1.9 (1.3–2.7)** 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 1.0 (0.7–1.4) —§§§ 7.1 (4.6–10.8)** Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DTaP = diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine; HepA = hepatitis A vaccine; HepB = hepatitis B vaccine; Hib = Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; PCV = pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. * MSA status was determined on the basis of household-reported county and city of residence and was grouped into three categories: MSA principal city, MSA nonprincipal city, and non-MSA. MSA and principal city were as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_cbsa.html). Non-MSA areas include urban populations not located within an MSA as well as completely rural areas. † Children’s health insurance status was reported by parent or guardian. “Other insurance” includes the Children’s Health Insurance Program, military insurance, coverage via the Indian Health Service, and any other type of health insurance not mentioned elsewhere. § Children in the 2017 National Immunization Survey-Child were born during January 2014–May 2016. ¶ Includes children who might have been vaccinated with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccine or diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine. ** Statistically significant (p<0.05) difference compared with the referent group. †† Includes children who might have been vaccinated with measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine. §§ Hib primary series: ≥2 or ≥3 doses, depending on product type received; full series includes primary series and booster dose, which includes receipt of ≥3 or ≥4 doses, depending on product type received. ¶¶ One dose of HepB administered from birth through age 3 days. *** Includes ≥2 or ≥3 doses, depending on product type received (≥2 doses for Rotarix [RV1] or ≥3 doses for RotaTeq [RV5]). ††† The combined 7-vaccine series (4:3:1:3*:3:1:4) includes ≥4 doses of DTaP, ≥3 doses of poliovirus vaccine, ≥1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, the full series of Hib (≥3 or ≥4 doses, depending on product type of vaccine), ≥3 doses of HepB, ≥1 dose of varicella, and ≥4 doses of PCV. §§§ Estimate not available because the 95% CI was ≥20. Coverage among children insured by Medicaid was lower (2.5–15.0 percentage points, depending on vaccine) than that among those with private insurance for all vaccines assessed except the HepB birth dose (Table 2). The same pattern was observed among uninsured children: coverage was substantially lower (14.7–30.3 percentage points) than that among those privately insured. Prevalence of uninsured children in the 2017 NIS-Child was 2.8%. This lower vaccination coverage among the uninsured, Medicaid-insured, and those living outside of MSAs was especially evident for diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), the full series of Haemophilius influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), that require a booster dose in the second year of life. In addition, the proportion of uninsured children who had received no vaccinations (7.1%) was higher than that among those with private insurance (0.8%). The proportion of unvaccinated children was similar among children insured by Medicaid and those with private insurance. Among unvaccinated children in the 2017 NIS-Child, 17.2% were uninsured. Differences in vaccination coverage by race/ethnicity and poverty status in 2017 were similar to those observed in previous years (Supplementary Table 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/59414) ( 3 ). Vaccination coverage also varied by state (Supplementary Table 2, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/59415). For example, estimated rotavirus coverage ranged from 64.7% in California to 85.1% in Rhode Island. Coverage with MMR ranged from 85.8% in Missouri to 98.3% in Massachusetts; MMR coverage was <90% for 11 states in 2017. Trends in Vaccination Coverage Coverage by month and year of birth remained stable during January 2012–January 2016 for most vaccines (Figure) ( 2 ). Coverage by age 2 years over 12 consecutive birth months declined by 0.5 percentage points for ≥3 HepB doses and increased by 1.1 percentage points for ≥2 HepA doses ( 2 ). Coverage with ≥2 HepA doses was higher by age 35 months than by age 24 months (e.g., 75.3% versus 39.6% for children born January 2012) ( 2 ). FIGURE Estimated linear trend in coverage with selected vaccines* by age 24 months, † by month and year of birth § — National Immunization Survey-Child, United States, 2013–2017 Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DTaP = diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis vaccine; HepA = hepatitis A vaccine; HepB = hepatitis B vaccine; Hib = Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; PCV = pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. * Hib full series: ≥3 or ≥4 doses, depending on product type received (primary series and booster dose). Rotavirus: ≥2 or ≥3 doses, depending on product type received (≥2 doses for Rotarix [RV1] or ≥3 doses for RotaTeq [RV5]). † Except for rotavirus, vaccination coverage was assessed before the child reached his/her 24-month birthday. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to account for censoring vaccination status for children assessed before age 24 months. Rotavirus vaccination was assessed before the child reached his/her 8-month birthday. § Estimated linear relationship between month and year of birth and vaccination coverage, based on weighted linear regression analysis using the inverse of the estimated variance of each point estimate to construct the weights. Estimated percentage point change over 12 birth months: ≥4 DTaP −0.55 (95% CI = -1.20 to 0.10); ≥3 poliovirus -0.17 (-0.52 to 0.18); ≥1 MMR -0.11 (-0.58 to 0.35); Hib full series -0.51 (-1.13 to 0.11); ≥3 HepB -0.53 (-0.97 to -0.09); ≥1 varicella -0.05 (-0.53 to 0.42); ≥4 PCV 0.0 (-0.69 to 0.68); ≥2 HepA 1.13 (0.30 to 1.97); rotavirus 0.68 (-0.09 to 1.45). The figure is a line graph showing the estimated linear trend in coverage with selected vaccines in U.S. children by age 24 months, by month and year of birth, based on data from the National Immunization Survey-Child during 2013–2017. HepB birth dose coverage was higher in 2017 (73.6%) than in 2016 (71.1%) (Table 1). Analysis of trends in HepB birth dose coverage by month and year of birth during January 2012–May 2016 indicated no change in coverage, although an increasing trend was estimated for more recent births (January 2014–May 2016) ( 2 ). The percentage of unvaccinated children increased from 0.8% in 2016 to 1.1% in 2017. By annual birth cohort, the percentage of children with no vaccinations by age 2 years increased from 0.9% for children born in 2011 to 1.3% (47,700 children) for those born in 2015 (Supplementary Figure, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/59413), representing an additional 18,400 unvaccinated children. Discussion Overall vaccination coverage among young children remained high and stable in the United States in 2017. However, the findings from this survey highlight several opportunities for improvement. Coverage was lower for most vaccines among uninsured and Medicaid-insured children and among children living outside of MSAs. These disparities were larger for vaccines that require a booster dose in the second year of life (e.g., DTaP, Hib, and PCV). Although the number of children who have received no vaccinations by age 24 months has been gradually increasing, most children are still routinely vaccinated. Continued evaluation of prevalence and reasons for nonvaccination is needed, as are improvements in access to and delivery of age-appropriate vaccinations to all children. CDC continues to examine barriers to early childhood vaccination, including assessing obstacles to and parents’ experiences with accessing vaccination services. Vaccination coverage differences by insurance status are concerning, given that children insured by Medicaid and uninsured children are eligible for the VFC program, which was designed to remove financial barriers by providing free vaccines to program participants. However, other issues, such as unfamiliarity with the VFC program and how to access it, transportation, child care, and convenience of clinic hours might also need to be addressed if the goals of this important element of the immunization safety net are to be fully realized. Lack of geographic proximity to vaccination providers, including those who participate in the VFC program, can be a barrier to vaccination. The shortage of health care providers, especially pediatricians, might partially explain the lower coverage among children living in rural areas ( 4 ). Vaccination coverage could be increased and sociodemographic and geographic disparities reduced with increased administration of all recommended vaccines during provider visits. A study of potentially achievable coverage estimated that 90% coverage would have been attained many years ago for the recommended number of doses of DTaP, PCV, and Hib for children aged 19–35 months if missed opportunities for administration of the final doses of these vaccines had been eliminated ( 5 ). Reducing missed opportunities would promote timely receipt of all recommended vaccine doses and decrease the amount of time that children remain vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases. The percentage of children who have received no vaccines has increased, reaching 1.3% for children born in 2015, compared with 0.3% among those 19–35 months when surveyed in 2001 ( 6 ). Some children might be unvaccinated because of choices made by parents, whereas for others, lack of access to health care or health insurance might be factors. Unvaccinated children in the 2017 NIS-Child were disproportionately uninsured: 17.2% of unvaccinated children were uninsured, compared with 2.8% of all children. Evidence-informed strategies addressing parents’ decisions about vaccinating their children could focus on both programs and individual patients, such as vaccine delivery through school programs, strong recommendations by providers to parents to vaccinate their children, and reinforcement of the importance of community protection through vaccination ( 7 ). Variation in coverage by health insurance and MSA status and the increasing percentage of unvaccinated children raise concerns about possible pockets of susceptibility in which children are not as well protected as national coverage estimates might indicate. Measles was declared eliminated from the United States in 2000, yet outbreaks caused by imported cases continue to occur each year; 118 measles cases were reported in 2017 (https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html) ( 8 ). The continued occurrence of measles outbreaks in the United States underscores the need to ensure high MMR coverage among all young children. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, low response rates and lack of access to phoneless households could result in selection bias, which might persist even with application of survey weights designed to minimize such bias. Second, vaccination histories might be incomplete if not all providers were identified or some of those identified chose not to participate. Bias in vaccination coverage estimates has been evaluated in a sensitivity analysis accounting for these potential errors, with results indicating underestimation of actual vaccination coverage by 4 to 5 percentage points ( 9 ). Vaccination coverage among young children could be improved through higher participation by both children and providers in the Vaccines for Children program. Consistent access to health insurance is another important element of the immunization safety net. Barriers to participation in the VFC program should be identified and eliminated so that all eligible children have the opportunity to access recommended vaccines. A number of evidence-based strategies have also been described that could enhance these efforts to increase vaccination coverage, such as notifying parents when children are due for a vaccination, establishing standing orders or policies that allow nonphysician personnel to administer vaccines, and enhancing computerized immunization information systems for tracking vaccinations (https://www.thecommunityguide.org/topic/vaccination) ( 10 ). Continued vaccination coverage assessment using the NIS-Child can guide efforts to improve vaccination coverage and protect children from vaccine-preventable diseases and better understand the low but increasing prevalence of nonvaccination. Summary What is already known about this topic? The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends routine vaccination by age 24 months against 14 potentially serious illnesses. What is added by this report? In 2017, coverage with most recommended vaccines among children aged 19–35 months remained stable and high but was lower in more rural areas and among uninsured or Medicaid-insured children. A small but increasing proportion of children received no vaccines by age 24 months. What are the implications for public health practice? Collaboration with state immunization programs, eliminating missed immunization opportunities, and minimizing interruptions in insurance coverage are important to understand and address coverage disparities among children eligible for the Vaccines for Children program and those in rural areas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Addressing barriers to vaccine acceptance: an overview.

          Addressing the drivers of vaccine hesitancy and the barriers to vaccine acceptance is a complex but important task. While the percentage of hesitant does vary from country to country and in time few, if any, countries are ever free from this problem. Overcoming hesitancy requires detection, diagnosis and tailored intervention as there is no simple strategy that can address all of the barriers to vaccine acceptance. Immunization program managers and health care workers need to become adept at recognizing and tackling hesitancy in all of its incarnations if high levels of vaccine acceptance are to be achieved but must also actively support immunization acceptors in order to build and support vaccine acceptance resiliency. This paper presents evidence-informed strategies to achieve these goals.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Measles Outbreak — Minnesota April–May 2017

            On April 10, 2017, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) was notified about a suspected measles case. The patient was a hospitalized child aged 25 months who was evaluated for fever and rash, with onset on April 8. The child had no history of receipt of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and no travel history or known exposure to measles. On April 11, MDH received a report of a second hospitalized, unvaccinated child, aged 34 months, with an acute febrile rash illness with onset on April 10. The second patient’s sibling, aged 19 months, who had also not received MMR vaccine, had similar symptoms, with rash onset on March 30. Real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing of nasopharyngeal swab or throat specimens performed at MDH confirmed measles in the first two patients on April 11, and in the third patient on April 13; subsequent genotyping identified genotype B3 virus in all three patients, who attended the same child care center. MDH instituted outbreak investigation and response activities in collaboration with local health departments, health care facilities, child care facilities, and schools in affected settings. Because the outbreak occurred in a community with low MMR vaccination coverage, measles spread rapidly, resulting in thousands of exposures in child care centers, schools, and health care facilities. By May 31, 2017, a total of 65 confirmed measles cases had been reported to MDH (Figure 1); transmission is ongoing. FIGURE 1 Number of measles cases (N = 65) by date of rash onset — Minnesota, March 30–May 27, 2017 The figure above is a histogram, an epidemiologic curve showing the 65 measles cases by date of rash onset in an outbreak in Minnesota during March 30–May 27, 2017. Investigation and Results After receiving notification of the first case on April 10, MDH and the Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department began an investigation. The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists and CDC case definition* was used to identify confirmed cases of measles in Minnesota ( 1 ). A health alert was issued April 12, which notified health care providers of the two measles cases in Hennepin County and provided recommendations concerning laboratory testing for measles and strategies to minimize transmission in health care settings. Emphasis was placed on recommendations for all children aged ≥12 months to receive a first dose of MMR. Providers identified patients with suspected measles based on clinical findings and reported suspected cases to MDH. Testing with rRT-PCR was performed at MDH on nasopharyngeal or throat swabs and urine specimens. Among persons testing positive by rRT-PCR who had received vaccine ≤21 days before the test, genotyping was performed to distinguish wild-type measles virus (genotype B3 virus) from the vaccine virus (genotype A virus). Patients (or their parents or guardians) with confirmed measles were interviewed by local public health officials to confirm symptoms, onset date, and exposure history for the 21 days before rash onset and identify contacts during their infectious period (4 days before through 4 days after rash onset). Contacts were defined as persons who had any contact with patients during their infectious period. Among the 65 confirmed cases, the median patient age was 21 months (range = 3 months–49 years). Patients were residents of Hennepin, Ramsey, LeSueur, and Crow Wing counties. During April 10–May 31, confirmed measles patients were identified in five schools, 12 child care centers, three health care facilities, and numerous households; an estimated 8,250 persons were potentially exposed to measles in these settings. Rash onset dates ranged from March 30–May 27, 2017. Sixty-two (95%) cases were identified in unvaccinated persons, including 50 (77%) in children aged ≥12 months (i.e., age-eligible for MMR vaccination). U.S.-born children of Somali descent (Somali children) accounted for 55 (85%) of the cases. Among the three patients with a history of measles vaccination, all had received 2 MMR doses before illness onset. As of May 31, 20 (31%) patients had been hospitalized, primarily for treatment of dehydration or pneumonia; no deaths had been reported. Public Health Response Rosters and attendance records were obtained from child care centers and schools where persons might have been exposed to measles, and the vaccination status of each attendee was verified through the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection, a system that stores electronic immunization records (http://www.health.state.mn.us/miic). Health care facilities similarly identified contacts who were exposed to measles patients and followed up with susceptible (i.e., unvaccinated, pregnant, or immunocompromised) exposed persons. In accordance with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices 2013 guidelines ( 2 ), postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) with MMR or immune globulin was recommended for susceptible, exposed persons. Persons who received PEP with MMR within 72 hours of exposure or with immune globulin within 6 days of exposure were placed on a 21-day self-monitoring symptom watch for development of fever or rash, but could continue attending child care and school. Susceptible exposed persons who did not receive PEP according to recommendations were excluded from child care centers or school, and MDH recommended that they avoid public gatherings for 21 days, including having visitors who were susceptible to measles virus. By May 31, at least 154 persons had received PEP (26 MMR doses and 128 courses of immune globulin), and 586 susceptible exposed persons who did not receive recommended PEP were excluded from child care centers or school and advised to receive MMR vaccination to protect against future measles illness. On April 18, as the outbreak continued, MDH recommended an accelerated MMR schedule; to provide additional protection, a second dose of MMR vaccine was recommended for children who had received a first dose >28 days previously. † These recommendations were initially for all children living in Hennepin County and for all Minnesota Somali children regardless of county of residence, because MMR coverage rates among Somali children in Hennepin County have declined since 2007. In 2014, coverage with the first dose of MMR among Somali children in Hennepin County was 35.6% (Figure 2). In response to the rapid increase in the number of reported cases, on May 4, 2017, MDH recommended an accelerated vaccination schedule for all children aged ≥12 months residing in all counties where a measles case had been reported during the previous 42 days; MDH further recommended that health care providers throughout the state consider using an accelerated schedule. FIGURE 2 Percentage of children receiving measles-mumps-rubella vaccine at age 24 months among children of Somali and non-Somali descent, by birth year — Hennepin County, Minnesota, 2004–2014 Source: Minnesota Immunization Information Connection, Minnesota Department of Health. The figure above is a line graph showing the percentages of Somali and non-Somali children who received measles-mumps-rubella vaccine at age 24 months, by birth year, in Hennepin County, Minnesota, during 2004–2014. Previously established culturally appropriate community outreach approaches (e.g., working with community and spiritual leaders, interpreters, health care providers, and community members) ( 3 ) were intensified during the outbreak. Using existing partnerships, state and local public health officials worked with MDH Somali public health advisors, Somali medical professionals, faith leaders, elected officials, and other community leaders to disseminate educational materials, attend community events, and create opportunities for open dialogue and education about measles and concerns about MMR vaccine. Child care centers and schools were provided talking points and informational sheets on measles and MMR vaccine, and posters with key messages were distributed in mosques and shopping malls popular with the Somali community. Community outreach focused on oral communication, which is preferred by this community, including radio and television messaging and telephone call-in lines that permit approximately 500 persons at a time to listen to a health professional. Outreach to encourage vaccination was increased during the outbreak. By the second week of May, the average number of MMR vaccine doses administered per week in Minnesota had increased from 2,700 doses before the outbreak to 9,964, as reported by the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection. Discussion Minnesota law requires that children aged ≥2 months be vaccinated against certain diseases or file a medical or conscientious exemption to enroll in school, child care, or school-based early childhood programs. Before 2008, first-dose MMR vaccination coverage among Minnesota-born Somali children aged 2 years in Hennepin County exceeded 90%. However, MMR vaccination coverage rates declined among Minnesota’s Somali-American community members starting with the 2008 birth-year cohort. The decline in vaccination coverage was in response to concerns about autism, the perceived increased rates of autism in the Somali-American community, and the misunderstanding that autism was related to MMR vaccine (3,4). Studies have consistently documented that there is not a relationship between vaccines and autism (5,6). The low vaccination rate resulted in a community highly susceptible to measles. Parental concerns were addressed by building trust with the community and identifying effective, culturally appropriate ways to address questions, concerns, and misinformation about MMR vaccine. In 2011, a smaller measles outbreak began in the Somali community in Hennepin County and resulted in 21 cases, including eight cases in persons of Somali descent ( 4 , 7 ). At that time, the 1-dose MMR vaccination coverage rate among Somali children aged 2 years in Hennepin County was 54%. The source of the 2011 outbreak was a Somali child aged 30 months who acquired measles while visiting Kenya ( 7 ). However, the source of the current outbreak is unknown, which suggests that additional cases have likely occurred that did not come to the attention of health care providers or public health departments. Although indigenous measles transmission has been eliminated in the United States, the virus continues to circulate widely in many regions of the world, including Africa, Europe, and parts of Asia, and is often introduced into the United States by international travelers ( 8 ). High measles vaccination coverage rates across subpopulations within communities are necessary to prevent the spread of measles. The current Minnesota measles outbreak, with 31% (20 of 65) of cases requiring hospitalization, demonstrates the importance of addressing low vaccination coverage rates to ensure that children are adequately protected from a potentially serious vaccine-preventable disease ( 3 ). Summary What is already known about this topic? Measles was declared eliminated from the United States in 2000 but continues to circulate in many regions of the world and can be imported into the United States by travelers. Measles vaccine is highly effective, with 1 dose being 93% effective and 2 doses being 97% effective at preventing measles. What is added by this report? In a community with previously high vaccination coverage, concerns about autism, the perceived increased rates of autism in the Somali-American community, and the misunderstanding that autism was related to the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine resulted in a decline in MMR vaccination coverage to a level low enough to sustain widespread measles transmission in the Somali-American community following introduction of the virus. Studies have consistently documented that there is not a relationship between vaccines and autism. What are the implications for public health practice? This outbreak demonstrates the challenge of combating misinformation about MMR vaccine and the importance of creating long-term, trusted relationships with communities to disseminate scientific information in a culturally appropriate and effective manner.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger — United States, 2017

              In October 2016, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved the Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger—United States, 2017. The 2017 child and adolescent immunization schedule summarizes ACIP recommendations, including several changes from the 2016 immunization schedules, in three figures, and footnotes for the figures. These documents can be found on the CDC immunization schedule website (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/index.html). These immunization schedules are approved by ACIP (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html), the American Academy of Pediatrics (https://www.aap.org), the American Academy of Family Physicians (https://www.aafp.org), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (http://www.acog.org). Health care providers are advised to use the figures and the combined footnotes together. The full ACIP recommendations for each vaccine, including contraindications and precautions, can be found at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.html. Providers should be aware that changes in recommendations for specific vaccines can occur between annual updates to the childhood/adolescent immunization schedules. If errors or omissions are discovered within the child and adolescent schedule, CDC posts revised versions on the CDC immunization schedule website.* Printable versions of the 2017 immunization schedules for children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger also are available at the website and ordering instructions for laminated versions and easy-to-read versions for parents also are available at the immunization schedule website. For further guidance on the use of each vaccine included in the schedules, including contraindications and precautions, health care providers are referred to the respective ACIP vaccine recommendations at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.html. Changes in the 2017 Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule Changes in the 2017 immunization schedules for children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger include new or revised ACIP recommendations for influenza ( 1 ); human papillomavirus ( 2 ); hepatitis B ( 3 ); Haemophilus influenzae type B ( 4 ); pneumococcal; meningococcal ( 5 , 6 ); and diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis ( 7 ) vaccines. Figure 1. Changes to the 2017 figure from the 2016 schedule † are as follows: The 16-year age column has been separated from the 17–18-year age column to highlight the need for a meningococcal conjugate vaccine booster dose at age 16 years. Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has been removed from the influenza row. A blue bar was added for human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) for children aged 9–10 years, indicating that persons in this age group may be vaccinated (even in the absence of a high-risk condition). Figure 3. A new figure, “Figure 3. Vaccines that might be indicated for children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger based on medical indications,” has been added. The purpose of this figure is to do the following: Demonstrate most children with medical conditions can (and should) be vaccinated according to the routine child/adolescent immunization schedule. Indicate when a medical condition is a precaution or contraindication to vaccination. Indicate when additional doses of vaccines may be necessary because of a child’s or adolescent’s medical condition. Providers should consult the relevant footnotes for additional information. Footnotes. Changes to the footnotes for the figures are as follows: The Hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) footnote was revised to reflect that the birth dose of HepB should be administered within 24 hours of birth. The diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) footnote was revised to more clearly present recommendations following an inadvertently early administered fourth dose of DTaP. Within the Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib) footnote, Comvax was removed from the routine vaccination portion of footnote. This vaccine has been removed from the market, and all available doses have expired. Additionally, Hiberix has been added to the list of vaccines that may be used for the primary vaccination series. Within the pneumococcal vaccine footnote, references to 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) have been removed. All healthy children who might have received PCV7 as part of a primary series have now aged out of the recommendation for pneumococcal vaccine. The influenza vaccine footnote has been updated to indicate that LAIV should not be used during the 2016–2017 influenza season. The meningococcal vaccines footnote has been updated to include recommendations for meningococcal vaccination of children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and to reflect recommendations for the use of a 2-dose Trumenba (meningococcal B vaccine) schedule. The tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) footnote for vaccination of pregnant adolescents between gestational weeks 27–36 has been updated to reflect a preference for vaccination earlier during this period. Currently available data suggest that vaccinating earlier in the 27 through 36–week period will maximize passive antibody transfer to the infant. The footnote for HPV vaccine has been updated to include the new 2-dose schedule for persons initiating the HPV vaccination series before age 15 years. In addition, bivalent HPV vaccine has been removed from the schedule. This vaccine has been removed from the U.S. market, and all available vaccine doses have expired.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                12 October 2018
                12 October 2018
                : 67
                : 40
                : 1123-1128
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Holly A. Hill, hhill@ 123456cdc.gov , 404-639-8044.
                Article
                mm6740a4
                10.15585/mmwr.mm6740a4
                6181261
                30307907
                f5ed2041-4f36-44d8-ae55-cab78dffc466

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article