0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differential diagnosis of different types of solid focal liver lesions using two-dimensional shear wave elastography

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          The clinical management and prognosis differ between benign and malignant solid focal liver lesions (FLLs), as well as among different pathological types of malignant FLLs. Accurate diagnosis of the possible types of solid FLLs is important. Our previous study confirmed the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) using maximal elasticity (Emax) as the parameter in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant FLLs. However, the value of SWE in the differential diagnosis among different pathological types of malignant FLLs has not been proved.

          AIM

          To explore the value of two-dimensional SWE (2D-SWE) using Emax in the differential diagnosis of FLLs, especially among different pathological types of malignant FLLs.

          METHODS

          All the patients enrolled in this study were diagnosed as benign, malignant or undetermined FLLs by conventional ultrasound. Emax of FLLs and the periphery of FLLs was measured using 2D-SWE and compared between benign and malignant FLLs or among different pathological types of malignant FLLs.

          RESULTS

          The study included 32 benign FLLs in 31 patients and 100 malignant FLLs in 96 patients, including 16 cholangiocellular carcinomas (CCCs), 72 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 12 liver metastases. Thirty-five FLLs were diagnosed as undetermined by conventional ultrasound. There were significant differences between Emax of malignant (2.21 ± 0.57 m/s) and benign (1.59 ± 0.37 m/s) FLLs ( P = 0.000), and between Emax of the periphery of malignant (1.52 ± 0.39 m/s) and benign (1.36 ± 0.44 m/s) FLLs ( P = 0.040). Emax of liver metastases (2.73 ± 0.99 m/s) was significantly higher than that of CCCs (2.14 ± 0.34 m/s) and HCCs (2.14 ± 0.46 m/s) ( P = 0.002). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 71.00%, 84.38% and 74.24% respectively, using Emax > 1.905 m/s (AUC 0.843) to diagnose as malignant and 23 of 35 (65.74%) FLLs with undetermined diagnosis by conventional ultrasound were diagnosed correctly.

          CONCLUSION

          Malignant FLLs were stiffer than benign ones and liver metastases were stiffer than primary liver carcinomas. 2D-SWE with Emax was a useful complement to conventional ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of FLLs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice.

          The athymic (nude) mouse is a useful model for studying the biology and response to therapies of human tumors in vivo. A survey of recent literature revealed the use of 19 different formulas for determining the size of subcutaneous tumors grown as xenografts in nude mice (2 for determining tumor area, 3 for tumor diameter, and 14 for calculating tumor volume). We compared the volumes, areas, and diameters predicted by each of the 19 formulas with the actual weights of 50 tumors ranging from 0.46 to 22.0 g established in nude mice as xenografts from human cell lines. In addition to determining how well each formula predicted relative tumor size, we analyzed how well each formula estimated actual tumor mass. The ellipsoid volume formulas (pi/6 x L x W x H and 1/2 x L x W x H) were best for estimating tumor mass (r = 0.93), whereas measurements of diameter correlated poorly with tumor mass (r less than 0.66). Although determination of tumor area correlated well with tumor mass in small tumors (r = 0.89), correlations of area with tumor mass for large tumors were poor (r = 0.41). We conclude that determination of the ellipsoid volume from measurements of three axes consistently yields the most accurate estimations of both relative and actual tumor mass.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            The Burden and Trends of Primary Liver Cancer Caused by Specific Etiologies from 1990 to 2017 at the Global, Regional, National, Age, and Sex Level Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

            Background: Liver cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The primary causes of liver cancer include hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcohol consumption, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and other factors. Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the global and sex-, age-, region-, country-, and etiology-related liver cancer burden, as well as the trends in liver cancer caused by different etiologies. Methods: The causes of liver cancer from 1990 to 2017, including global, regional, and national liver cancer incidence, mortality, and etiology, were collected from the Global Burden of Disease study 2017, and the time-dependent change in the trends of liver cancer burden was evaluated by annual percentage change. Results: The global liver cancer incidence and mortality have been increasing. There were 950,000 newly-diagnosed liver cancer cases and over 800,000 deaths in 2017, which is more than twice the numbers recorded in 1990. HBV and HCV are the major causes of liver cancer. HBV is the major risk factor of liver cancer in Asia, while HCV and alcohol abuse are the major risk factors in the high sociodemographic index and high human development index regions. The mean onset age and incidence of liver cancer with different etiologies have gradually increased in the past 30 years. Conclusions: The global incidence is still rising and the causes have national, regional, or population specificities. More targeted prevention strategies must be developed for the different etiologic types in order to reduce liver cancer burden.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) 2017 – a review of important differences compared to the CT/MRI system

              Medical imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was initially created to standardize the reporting and data collection of CT and MR imaging for patients at risk for HCC. As contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been widely used in clinical practice, it has recently been added to the LI-RADS. While CEUS LI-RADS shares fundamental concepts with CT/MRI LI-RADS, there are key differences between the modalities reflecting dissimilarities in the underlying methods of image acquisition and types of contrast material. This review introduces a recent update of CEUS LI-RADS and explains the key differences from CT/MRI LI-RADS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastroenterol
                World J Gastroenterol
                WJG
                World Journal of Gastroenterology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1007-9327
                2219-2840
                28 August 2022
                28 August 2022
                : 28
                : 32
                : 4716-4725
                Affiliations
                Department of Ultrasound, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
                Department of Ultrasound, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
                Department of Ultrasound, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
                Department of Infectious Diseases, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
                Department of Ultrasound, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
                Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Changning Maternity and Infant Health Hospital, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200050, China
                Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Changning Maternity and Infant Health Hospital, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200050, China. zhanggirldan@ 123456163.com
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Guo J and Jiang D contributed equally to this work; Guo J, Jiang D, Yu J and Zhang HP designed the study; Guo J, Jiang D, Qian Y and Gu YJ performed the research and collected data; Zhang HP and Zhou YQ performed statistical analysis; Guo J and Jiang D wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

                Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai of China, No. 19ZR1441500, No. 22ZR1458200; Science Research Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, No. 202140378; and Key Program of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Changning, Shanghai, China, No. CNKW2020Z04.

                Corresponding author: Hui-Ping Zhang, MD, PhD, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Changning Maternity and Infant Health Hospital, East China Normal University, No. 786 Yuyuan Road, Shanghai 200050, China. zhanggirldan@ 123456163.com

                Article
                jWJG.v28.i31.pg4716
                10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4716
                9476867
                36157921
                f6000f51-df5c-4fab-a0aa-61fbf449983f
                ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 6 April 2022
                : 15 July 2022
                : 31 July 2022
                Categories
                Prospective Study

                focal liver lesions,conventional ultrasound,two-dimensional shear wave elastography,differential diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article