Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      "Yummy" versus "Yucky"! Explicit and implicit approach-avoidance motivations towards appealing and disgusting foods.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Wanting and rejecting food are natural reactions that we humans all experience, often unconsciously, on a daily basis. However, in the food domain, the focus to date has primarily been on the approach tendency, and researchers have tended not to study the two opposing tendencies in a balanced manner. Here, we develop a methodology with which to understand people's implicit and explicit reactions to both positive (appealing) and negative (disgusting) foods. It consists of a combination of direct and indirect computer-based tasks, as well as a validated food image stimulus set, specifically designed to investigate motivational approach and avoidance responses towards foods. Fifty non-dieting participants varying in terms of their hunger state (hungry vs. not hungry) reported their explicit evaluations of pleasantness, wanting, and disgust towards the idea of tasting each of the food images that were shown. Their motivational tendencies towards those food items were assessed indirectly using a joystick-based approach-avoidance procedure. For each of the food images that were presented, the participants had to move the joystick either towards or away from themselves (approach and avoidance movements, respectively) according to some unrelated instructions, while their reaction times were recorded. Our findings demonstrated the hypothesised approach-avoidance compatibility effect: a significant interaction of food valence and direction of movement. Furthermore, differences between the experimental groups were observed. The participants in the no-hunger group performed avoidance (vs. approach) movements significantly faster; and their approach movements towards positive (vs. negative) foods were significantly faster. As expected, the self-report measures revealed a strong effect of the food category on the three dependent variables and a strong main effect of the hunger state on wanting and to a lesser extent on pleasantness.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Appetite
          Appetite
          Elsevier BV
          1095-8304
          0195-6663
          Jul 2014
          : 78
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. Electronic address: betina.piqueras-fiszman@psy.ox.ac.uk.
          [2 ] Department of Business Administration & MAPP, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 10, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
          [3 ] Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
          Article
          S0195-6663(14)00156-1
          10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.029
          24709484
          f63a93ac-aca3-4625-987a-f0351389f9de
          Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
          History

          Approach–avoidance,Disgust,Implicit,Motivation,Pleasantness,Wanting

          Comments

          Comment on this article