36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Rise of the “Gig Economy” and Implications for Understanding Work and Workers

      Industrial and Organizational Psychology
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bergman and Jean (2016) include freelancers as one of the categories of workers who are understudied in the industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology literature. This neglect is particularly striking given the attention paid by the popular media and by politicians to the rise of the “gig economy,” comprising primarily short-term independent freelance workers (e.g., Cook, 2015; Kessler, 2014; Scheiber, 2014; Warner, 2015). This may be due in part to challenges involved in accessing and researching this population, as discussed by Bergman and Jean, but it may also arise from complexities in defining and conceptualizing freelance work, as well as from misunderstandings about the nature of the work now performed by many people who are considered freelancers. Major topics of interest to I-O psychologists such as organizational attraction, job satisfaction, and turnover may seem at first glance to lack relevance to the study of workers who are officially classified as self-employed. But there is substantial opportunity for I-O psychologists and other behaviorally oriented organizational researchers to contribute to our understanding of the growing number of people who earn all or some of their income by freelancing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          eLancing: A review and research agenda for bridging the science–practice gap

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Where Have All the “Workers” Gone? A Critical Analysis of the Unrepresentativeness of Our Samples Relative to the Labor Market in the Industrial–Organizational Psychology Literature

            In this article, we demonstrate that samples in the industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology literature do not reflect the labor market, overrepresenting core, salaried, managerial, professional, and executive employees while underrepresenting wage earners, low- and medium-skill first-line personnel, and contract workers. We describe how overrepresenting managers, professionals, and executives causes research about these other workers to be suspect. We describe several ways that this underrepresentation reduces the utility of the I-O literature and provide specific examples. We discuss why the I-O literature underrepresents these workers, how it contributes to the academic–practitioner gap, and what researchers can do to remedy the issue.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Drivers of freelance career success

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Industrial and Organizational Psychology
                Ind. Organ. Psychol.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1754-9426
                1754-9434
                March 2016
                March 23 2016
                March 2016
                : 9
                : 1
                : 157-162
                Article
                10.1017/iop.2015.129
                f6ef5a6f-3781-4bda-9b9c-c49220638889
                © 2016

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article