17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Touchscreen Motivation Assessment Evaluated in Huntington's Disease Patients and R6/1 Model Mice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Apathy is pervasive across many neuropsychiatric disorders but is poorly characterized mechanistically, so targeted therapeutic interventions remain elusive. A key impediment has been the lack of validated assessment tools to facilitate translation of promising findings between preclinical disease models and patients. Apathy is a common symptom in Huntington's disease. Due to its established genetic basis and the availability of defined animal models, this disease offers a robust translational framework for linking motivated behavior with underlying neurobiology and an ideal context in which to evaluate a quantitative, translational apathy assessment method. In this study we therefore aimed to demonstrate the validity of using touchscreen-delivered progressive ratio tasks to mirror apathy assessment in Huntington's disease patients and a representative mouse model. To do this we evaluated Huntington's disease patients ( n = 23) and age-matched healthy controls ( n = 20), and male R6/1 mice ( n = 23) and wildtype controls ( n = 29) for apathy-like behavior using touchscreen-delivered progressive ratio tasks. The primary outcome measure of the assessment was breakpoint, defined as the highest number of touchscreen responses emitted before task engagement ceased. Patients and R6/1 mice were both found to exhibit significantly reduced breakpoints relative to their respective control groups, consistent with apathy-like behavior. This performance was also not associated with motoric differences in either species. These data demonstrate the utility of touchscreen-delivered progressive ratio tasks in detecting clinically relevant motivational deficits in Huntington's disease. This approach may offer a platform from which clinically relevant mechanistic insights concerning motivation symptoms can be derived and provide an effective route for translation of promising preclinical findings into viable therapeutic interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength.

          W Hodos (1961)
          Four rats were trained to press a lever on a ratio schedule of reinforcement in which the number of lever presses required on each consecutive run increased by a fixed increment. Both concentration and volume of the reward were varied. Relationships were obtained between reward and deprivation variables and the size of the final completed ratio run.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Proposed diagnostic criteria for apathy in Alzheimer's disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

            There is wide acknowledgement that apathy is an important behavioural syndrome in Alzheimer's disease and in various neuropsychiatric disorders. In light of recent research and the renewed interest in the correlates and impacts of apathy, and in its treatments, it is important to develop criteria for apathy that will be widely accepted, have clear operational steps, and that will be easily applied in practice and research settings. Meeting these needs is the focus of the task force work reported here. The task force includes members of the Association Française de Psychiatrie Biologique, the European Psychiatric Association, the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium and experts from Europe, Australia and North America. An advanced draft was discussed at the consensus meeting (during the EPA conference in April 7th 2008) and a final agreement reached concerning operational definitions and hierarchy of the criteria. Apathy is defined as a disorder of motivation that persists over time and should meet the following requirements. Firstly, the core feature of apathy, diminished motivation, must be present for at least four weeks; secondly two of the three dimensions of apathy (reduced goal-directed behaviour, goal-directed cognitive activity, and emotions) must also be present; thirdly there should be identifiable functional impairments attributable to the apathy. Finally, exclusion criteria are specified to exclude symptoms and states that mimic apathy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The touchscreen operant platform for testing learning and memory in rats and mice.

              An increasingly popular method of assessing cognitive functions in rodents is the automated touchscreen platform, on which a number of different cognitive tests can be run in a manner very similar to touchscreen methods currently used to test human subjects. This methodology is low stress (using appetitive rather than aversive reinforcement), has high translational potential and lends itself to a high degree of standardization and throughput. Applications include the study of cognition in rodent models of psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, Huntington's disease, frontotemporal dementia), as well as the characterization of the role of select brain regions, neurotransmitter systems and genes in rodents. This protocol describes how to perform four touchscreen assays of learning and memory: visual discrimination, object-location paired-associates learning, visuomotor conditional learning and autoshaping. It is accompanied by two further protocols (also published in this issue) that use the touchscreen platform to assess executive function, working memory and pattern separation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                09 August 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 858
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [2] 2School of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University , Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [4] 4John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine , Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [5] 5Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario , London, ON, Canada
                [6] 6Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine , Cambridge, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Giuseppe De Michele, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

                Reviewed by: Natascia De Lucia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Italy; Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi, Université Paris Est/Assistance Publique -Hôpitaux de Paris/INSERM/Ecole Normale Supéruiere, France

                *Correspondence: Christopher J. Heath christopher.heath@ 123456open.ac.uk
                Claire O'Callaghan co365@ 123456cam.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Movement Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work

                ‡These authors have contributed equally to this work

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2019.00858
                6696591
                31447770
                f7564ce9-4f8a-4a63-977f-67df64684b88
                Copyright © 2019 Heath, O'Callaghan, Mason, Phillips, Saksida, Robbins, Barker, Bussey and Sahakian.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 21 March 2019
                : 24 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 74, Pages: 11, Words: 8818
                Categories
                Neurology
                Original Research

                Neurology
                huntington's disease,apathy,touchscreen,translational,motivation,progressive ratio
                Neurology
                huntington's disease, apathy, touchscreen, translational, motivation, progressive ratio

                Comments

                Comment on this article