42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Status of Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The brackish Baltic Sea hosts species of various origins and environmental tolerances. These immigrated to the sea 10,000 to 15,000 years ago or have been introduced to the area over the relatively recent history of the system. The Baltic Sea has only one known endemic species. While information on some abiotic parameters extends back as long as five centuries and first quantitative snapshot data on biota (on exploited fish populations) originate generally from the same time, international coordination of research began in the early twentieth century. Continuous, annual Baltic Sea-wide long-term datasets on several organism groups (plankton, benthos, fish) are generally available since the mid-1950s. Based on a variety of available data sources (published papers, reports, grey literature, unpublished data), the Baltic Sea, incl. Kattegat, hosts altogether at least 6,065 species, including at least 1,700 phytoplankton, 442 phytobenthos, at least 1,199 zooplankton, at least 569 meiozoobenthos, 1,476 macrozoobenthos, at least 380 vertebrate parasites, about 200 fish, 3 seal, and 83 bird species. In general, but not in all organism groups, high sub-regional total species richness is associated with elevated salinity. Although in comparison with fully marine areas the Baltic Sea supports fewer species, several facets of the system's diversity remain underexplored to this day, such as micro-organisms, foraminiferans, meiobenthos and parasites. In the future, climate change and its interactions with multiple anthropogenic forcings are likely to have major impacts on the Baltic biodiversity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references158

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Life on the margin: genetic isolation and diversity loss in a peripheral marine ecosystem, the Baltic Sea.

          Marginal populations are often isolated and under extreme selection pressures resulting in anomalous genetics. Consequently, ecosystems that are geographically and ecologically marginal might have a large share of genetically atypical populations, in need of particular concern in management of these ecosystems. To test this prediction, we analysed genetic data from 29 species inhabiting the low saline Baltic Sea, a geographically and ecologically marginal ecosystem. On average Baltic populations had lost genetic diversity compared to Atlantic populations: a pattern unrelated to dispersal capacity, generation time of species and taxonomic group of organism, but strongly related to type of genetic marker (mitochondrial DNA loci had lost c. 50% diversity, and nuclear loci 10%). Analyses of genetic isolation by geographic distance revealed clinal patterns of differentiation between Baltic and Atlantic regions. For a majority of species, clines were sigmoid with a sharp slope around the Baltic Sea entrance, indicating impeded gene flows between Baltic and Atlantic populations. Some species showed signs of allele frequencies being perturbed at the edge of their distribution inside the Baltic Sea. Despite the short geological history of the Baltic Sea (8000 years), populations inhabiting the Baltic have evolved substantially different from Atlantic populations, probably as a consequence of isolation and bottlenecks, as well as selection on adaptive traits. In addition, the Baltic Sea also acts a refuge for unique evolutionary lineages. This marginal ecosystem is thus vulnerable but also exceedingly valuable, housing unique genes, genotypes and populations that constitute an important genetic resource for management and conservation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How does fishing alter marine populations and ecosystems sensitivity to climate?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems.

              Fisheries can have a large impact on marine ecosystems, because the effects of removing large predatory fish may cascade down the food web. The implications of these cascading processes on system functioning and resilience remain a source of intense scientific debate. By using field data covering a 30-year period, we show for the Baltic Sea that the underlying mechanisms of trophic cascades produced a shift in ecosystem functioning after the collapse of the top predator cod. We identified an ecological threshold, corresponding to a planktivore abundance of approximately 17 x 10(10) individuals, that separates 2 ecosystem configurations in which zooplankton dynamics are driven by either hydroclimatic forces or predation pressure. Abundances of the planktivore sprat above the threshold decouple zooplankton dynamics from hydrological circumstances. The current strong regulation by sprat of the feeding resources for larval cod may hinder cod recovery and the return of the ecosystem to a prior state. This calls for the inclusion of a food web perspective in management decisions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2010
                1 September 2010
                : 5
                : 9
                : e12467
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Pärnu, Estonia
                [2 ]Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tallinn, Estonia
                [3 ]National Institute for Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Charlottenlund, Denmark
                [4 ]Uni Miljo, Uni Research AS, Bergen, Norway
                [5 ]Coastal Research and Planning Institute, Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania
                [6 ]Palaeoceanology Unit, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
                [7 ]Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
                [8 ]Department of Biology, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemuende, Germany
                Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, France
                Author notes
                Article
                10-PONE-RW-17354R2
                10.1371/journal.pone.0012467
                2931693
                20824189
                f7c3943d-c011-4465-8b44-cbc3418e6293
                Ojaveer et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 24 March 2010
                : 1 August 2010
                Page count
                Pages: 19
                Categories
                Review
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences/Ecology
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences/Fisheries
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences/Historical Biology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article